Comments on: the left coaster’s conclusions I… http://1boringoldman.com/index.php/2006/03/01/the-left-coasters-conclusions/ All Mickey, All the Time Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:21:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 By: Mickey http://1boringoldman.com/index.php/2006/03/01/the-left-coasters-conclusions/#comment-161 Mickey Wed, 01 Mar 2006 22:36:18 +0000 http://1boringoldman.com/?p=195#comment-161 Dawn, Yes I remember Dr. Kelly. That's the story that got me blogging in the first place. When I catch up with Eriposte, I plan to start my new 'timeline' hobby, and he's a part of it. He knew that the British were twisting things. I wonder what else he knew? Your version of the timeline is part of that. I'll be in touch... Dawn,

Yes I remember Dr. Kelly. That’s the story that got me blogging in the first place. When I catch up with Eriposte, I plan to start my new ‘timeline’ hobby, and he’s a part of it. He knew that the British were twisting things. I wonder what else he knew? Your version of the timeline is part of that. I’ll be in touch…

]]> By: Dawn C. http://1boringoldman.com/index.php/2006/03/01/the-left-coasters-conclusions/#comment-160 Dawn C. Wed, 01 Mar 2006 18:19:02 +0000 http://1boringoldman.com/?p=195#comment-160 PS You remember that the last email that Dr. Kelly sent was to JUDITH MILLER, right? "...Many dark actors, playing games" (!) PS You remember that the last email that Dr. Kelly sent was to JUDITH MILLER, right? “…Many dark actors, playing games” (!)

]]> By: Dawn C. http://1boringoldman.com/index.php/2006/03/01/the-left-coasters-conclusions/#comment-159 Dawn C. Wed, 01 Mar 2006 18:10:11 +0000 http://1boringoldman.com/?p=195#comment-159 ~In the timeline from Wilson's (boring) book, he writes: DEC 01-Jan 02: "The first reports of Iraq-Niger uranium connection surface in the Bush Administration." In my opinion, the 'reason' for the 'Administration' /CIA-attempt to skew the date by which they KNEW the docs were forgeries, is DUE to the release date of the BRITISH WHITE PAPER on SEPT. 24, 2002. It is THIS DOCUMENT that "enabled" Bush to use the 16 word LIE in his SOTU '03. It is also, sadly, the document that Dr. David Kelly took issue with, and is at the center of the "official story" in the months prior to his 'suicide' in Britain, during July of '03~ (concurring w/ the public release of the Joe Wilson "work-up" in America.) www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/documents/0,12962,916659,00.html http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=MAN20050702&articleId=622 The Senate report then reveals that a CIA analyst in September 2002 suggested to a staff member of the White House's NSC that the White House remove from a proposed speech the claim that Iraq attempted to acquire uranium from Africa. SR p. 51. According to the CIA analyst the NSC staff member responded by stating that removing the claim would leave the British "flapping in the wind." SR p. 51. Excellent job, as usual, M. ! ~In the timeline from Wilson’s (boring) book, he writes:

DEC 01-Jan 02: “The first reports of Iraq-Niger uranium connection surface in the Bush Administration.”

In my opinion, the ‘reason’ for the ‘Administration’ /CIA-attempt to skew the date by which they KNEW the docs were forgeries, is DUE to the release date of the BRITISH WHITE PAPER on SEPT. 24, 2002. It is THIS DOCUMENT that “enabled” Bush to use the 16 word LIE in his SOTU ’03.

It is also, sadly, the document that Dr. David Kelly took issue with, and is at the center of the “official story” in the months prior to his ‘suicide’ in Britain, during July of ’03~ (concurring w/ the public release of the Joe Wilson “work-up” in America.)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/documents/0,12962,916659,00.html

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=MAN20050702&articleId=622
The Senate report then reveals that a CIA analyst in September 2002 suggested to a staff member of the White House’s NSC that the White House remove from a proposed speech the claim that Iraq attempted to acquire uranium from Africa. SR p. 51. According to the CIA analyst the NSC staff member responded by stating that removing the claim would leave the British “flapping in the wind.” SR p. 51.

Excellent job, as usual, M. !

]]>