no…

Posted on Wednesday 29 August 2007


Bush May Fight for New Attorney General
President Seeks Agreement With Policies

A half-dozen or so lawyers are being discussed among administration officials as possible candidates to replace Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, but no clear favorite has emerged, and President Bush is willing to fight for the right candidate, administration officials and Republican advisers said yesterday.

Democratic Senate leaders have called on the White House to consult them closely during the selection process, but administration officials warned yesterday that the president intends to nominate an attorney general who agrees with his policies. "It is the president’s prerogative to appoint someone who shares his views," a senior administration official said.
… the president intends to nominate an attorney general who agrees with his policies. It’s an odd thing to say, if you think about it.

The rule of law is better than the rule of any individual
Aristotle, 350 B.C.

The Law is a collection of the rules of conduct set down in a society’s founding, and the history of the interpretation of these rules over time. It’s the wisdom of the ‘past’ speaking to the ‘present.’ In free societies, the law attempts to balance the rights of individuals with the rights of society as a whole. So ‘Justice is blind’ – meaning that the law is applied equally to all people, not tailored to fit the needs of any given person or group. A society is literally defined by its laws.

For six and a half years, we’ve labored under a government which does not believe in that view of our society or its laws. They’ve repeatedly said in one way or another that the Executive Branch is the government – above or outside the laws that have traditionally governed us. They’ve repeatedly claimed that the actions of the Executive Branch are not subject to the scrutiny that holds for the rest of us. We’ve recently had a crisis in the Agency responsible for enforcing our laws – a crisis that has resulted in mass resignations either in protest or to escape being called to task for breaking the very laws it is charged with enforcing.

And now, the President’s representative says, It is the president’s prerogative to appoint someone who shares his views and warns … the president intends to nominate an attorney general who agrees with his policies. We all know what that means. President Bush and Vice President Cheney want to appoint another version of Alberto Gonzales – someone who will not interfere with whatever they want to do by holding them to the law as we have known it in this country. The response to President Bush in that regard is simple – no. And if Congress has to sit in constant session for the next 509 days to block a recess appointment, so be it. Either appoint an Attorney General who enforces our laws equally, or we don’t need an Attorney General…
  1.  
    smoooochie
    August 29, 2007 | 8:52 AM
     

    Well said. The law is not about the Attorney General, but the A.G. should be about the law and ONLY about the law.

  2.  
    joyhollywood
    August 29, 2007 | 11:21 AM
     

    You and smoooochie have it right. Check out Larry Johnson’s latest blog titled Stopping the New War Before It Starts at noquarterusa.net/blog I am getting really scared that Bush/Cheney are delusional enough to actually go to war with Iran. I’ll take Larry Johnson and Pat Lang’s expertise on this subject anytime.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.