the virtual economy…

Posted on Monday 22 September 2008

A couple of weeks ago it seemed okay for me to say "I don’t know much about the economy," or so I thought. As things are playing out, it was anything but okay. Up until a few weeks ago, I knew that lending institutions had allowed people to buy property who had no money to pay for it – getting loans that had strange names and deferred payback schemes. So I knew enough to know what the problem was, but I didn’t know why they made those loans, or how they were allowed to make those loans.

A couple of weeks ago it wasn’t so clear to me that when John McCain said "I don’t know much about the economy," he was leaving out his direct and indirect involvement in the sequence of event thats lead us to the door of financial collapse that stands before us now. If he doesn’t know much about the economy, what’s he doing hanging around with the "Keating Five?" Why is Phil Gramm his "Financial Advisor?" John McCain is chairman of the Commerce Committee, for God’s sake!

So, as wrong as it was for me [and you] to say "I don’t know much about the economy," for John McCain to say it is cataclysmic. There are two "must read" posts on Daily Kos that will bring you somewhat up to speed on the broad outline of our financial maelstrom:
The Savings and Loan Crisis, Enron, and the Mortgage Crisis are all related – not just because they are in our minds as disasters, but because they are related escalating versions of the same cancer – that thing about our economy we "don’t know much about." It’s called deregulation, and it’s a gift from the Reagan Era – involved with names like Phil Gramm [McCain’s Financial Advisor], John McCain, Ronald Reagan, Alan Greenspan, and even Fred Thompson scattered among the sea of lesser known lobbyists.

So why would lending institutions want to make bad loans? That makes almost no sense. It’s because it gives them something that looks like it has value. With deregulation, mortgages became a commodity – something of presumed value to trade. Disconnected from the actual loaning institution and property, they have been traded like baseball cards – having a value disconnected from their origin [bubble gum]. But they’re supposed to have value, so they’re insured. But then the loan insurance becomes a commodity disconnected from the loans and the liability, and the insurance is traded. All of this trading generates a lot of money for the traders. So long as these loans have value, and their insurors have assets, things are fine in a rising market. But when the bad loans default and the insurors have no assets to cover the defaulting loans, and the banks have hidden their liabilities in something called "debt transfers," the house of cards collapses.

This is what happened in 1929, the stocks being traded had become worthless, and Humpty Dumpty fell off of the wall. So there were a number of regulatory forces put in place to block this business of creating virtual value for traders to play with as if it had meaning. Then along comes Reagan. He did it himself with the National Debt. His followers passed a bunch of lobbyist written legislation that eroded the regulatory constraints, and it has happened again – in spades. And now BushCo is proposing we pass this meaningless debt into our real National Debt…
  1.  
    October 2, 2008 | 11:56 PM
     

    […] A lot of it was "bubbleware," virtual money that was not backed up by real value [the virtual economy…, the perfect storm…]. And those retirement plans that have all done so well? I guess that […]

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.