<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: clash of the titans II&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://1boringoldman.com/index.php/2009/01/12/clash-of-the-titans-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://1boringoldman.com/index.php/2009/01/12/clash-of-the-titans-ii/</link>
	<description>All Mickey, All the Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:35:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Roughton</title>
		<link>http://1boringoldman.com/index.php/2009/01/12/clash-of-the-titans-ii/#comment-101405</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Roughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1boringoldman.com/?p=2808#comment-101405</guid>
		<description>Double Ditto.   Contrast with dick cheney&#039;s secret meetings of his energy task force, for which he still refuses to even release the names of those participating.

Come to think of it, wasn&#039;t there a similar criticism of Hillary Clinton&#039;s health care reform task force?  Maybe it wasn&#039;t about naming the participants but something about lack of transparency.  Maybe it was the lack of open meetings.

A side note:  the term &#039;transparency&#039; has become such a common thing to say about government (now that we&#039;re about to get it), but I first encountered the usage when I was active in the International Psychoanalytic Association&#039;s governing body.  We Americans were talking about &#039;openness&#039; in the political process, and the Europeans were calling it &#039;transparency.&#039;   This was about 10 years ago, and it was the first time I heard it used that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Double Ditto.   Contrast with dick cheney&#8217;s secret meetings of his energy task force, for which he still refuses to even release the names of those participating.</p>
<p>Come to think of it, wasn&#8217;t there a similar criticism of Hillary Clinton&#8217;s health care reform task force?  Maybe it wasn&#8217;t about naming the participants but something about lack of transparency.  Maybe it was the lack of open meetings.</p>
<p>A side note:  the term &#8216;transparency&#8217; has become such a common thing to say about government (now that we&#8217;re about to get it), but I first encountered the usage when I was active in the International Psychoanalytic Association&#8217;s governing body.  We Americans were talking about &#8216;openness&#8217; in the political process, and the Europeans were calling it &#8216;transparency.&#8217;   This was about 10 years ago, and it was the first time I heard it used that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

