it’s not time for it to be over yet…

Posted on Thursday 25 February 2010

The Torture Lawyers
New York Times

February 24, 2010

Is this really the state of ethics in the American legal profession? Government lawyers who abused their offices to give the president license to get away with torture did nothing that merits a review by the bar? A five-year inquiry by the Justice Department’s ethics watchdogs recommended a disciplinary review for the two lawyers who produced the infamous torture memos for former President George W. Bush, but they were overruled by a more senior Justice Department official.

The original investigation found that the lawyers, John Yoo and Jay Bybee, had committed “professional misconduct” in a series of memos starting in August 2002. First, they defined torture so narrowly as to make it almost impossible to accuse a jailer of torturing a prisoner, and they finally concluded that President Bush was free to ignore any law on the conduct of war. The Justice Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility said appropriate bar associations should be asked to look at the actions of Mr. Yoo, who teaches at the University of California, Berkeley, and Mr. Bybee, who was rewarded for his political loyalty with a lifetime appointment to the federal bench. It was a credible accounting, especially since some former officials, like Attorney General John Ashcroft, refused to cooperate and e-mails from Mr. Yoo were mysteriously missing.

But the more senior official, David Margolis, decided that Mr. Yoo and Mr. Bybee only had shown “poor judgment” and should not be disciplined. Mr. Margolis did not dispute that Mr. Yoo and Mr. Bybee mangled legal reasoning and produced work that ultimately was repudiated by the Bush administration itself. He criticized the professional responsibility office’s investigation on procedural grounds and excused Mr. Yoo and Mr. Bybee by noting that everyone was frightened after Sept. 11, 2001, and that they were in a hurry…
It doesn’t seem to me that only had shown ‘poor judgment’ is much of an excuse for lawyers in such a responsible position – a position where judgment was their only job. Likewise, the idea that they were in a hurry is absurd. Yoo kept rolling out those crazy opinions for several years until he quit the DoJ because he wasn’t promoted.
Mr. Yoo and Mr. Bybee were not acting as fair-minded analysts of the law but as facilitators of a scheme to evade it. The White House decision to brutalize detainees already had been made. Mr. Yoo and Mr. Bybee provided legal cover.
Which is much more to the point. And the DoJ reviewer doesn’t get such good press otherwise [David Margolis: Hatchet Man for Holder/Obama on OPR Torture Memos Report]. I don’t know the ins and outs of the DoJ, but this review of the OPR report smells as bad as Yoo’s original memos. And as for poor judgment, John Yoo has left a trail of poor judgment all over the place, specifically all over the op-ed pages of the Wall Street Journal.
We were glad that the leaders of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, Representative John Conyers Jr. and Senator Patrick Leahy, committed to holding hearings after the release of the Justice Department documents… The American Bar Association should decide whether its rules are adequate for deterring and punishing ethical failures by government lawyers.
I hope Conyers and Leahy subpoena the whole list, specifically David Addington and John Ashcroft [in a hurry]…
    February 25, 2010 | 8:13 PM

    “Principle (including, presumably “good judgment”) is OK up to a certain point, but principle doesn’t do any good if you lose.” Dick Cheney (1976) (parenthesis added)

    February 26, 2010 | 6:32 AM

    Doesn’t this quote unearthed by Carl just sum up Cheney to an absolute “T?”

    February 26, 2010 | 5:55 PM

    It’s perfect! I think Cheney actually believes such things.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.