cynical industry…

Posted on Monday 1 August 2011

Teen Screen: Should We Be Testing for Mental Illness?
The push is on to early identify youth with mental disorders. Do we really know how? Fourth in a series on medical screening
The Tyee
– British Columbia
By Alan Cassels
25 July 2011

"When left untreated, mental illness can lead to devastating consequences. These include drug and alcohol abuse, violence, school failure, involvement in the criminal justice system, and the loss of critical developmental years that can never be recaptured." (Teen Screen)

Most parents believe that they’d be the first to know if their child was depressed or at risk for suicide. Yet according to a group promoting teen mental illness screening, such as the Teen Screen National Centre for Mental Health Checkups at Columbia University, "80 per cent of mentally ill youth are not identified and do not receive services." Could it really be so? These advocates are pushing to get every teenager in the U.S. screened for mental health problems, contending that "screening can help find those youth who are suffering from undiagnosed mental illness or are at risk for suicide, make their parents aware of their children’s difficulties, and help connect them with mental health services that can save their lives." Like all medical screening, this one sounds reasonable on the surface. Teen suicide and depression are well known, and prevalent. If teenagers have undiagnosed and untreated mental health problems, and if we could do something to screen teenagers for mental illness — and help divert them from a path of destruction — why wouldn’t we do it?

Unfortunately, when it come to types of medical screening that look good in theory but are largely unworkable in practice, mental health screening is probably the archetype. The mental health "Teen Screen" program is riven with gross conflicts of interest and inappropriate political influence, all which has led to the rapid uptake and prescribing of some of the most dangerous drugs on the planet. Back in 2002 under George Bush, the president’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health was formed and it recommended, among other things, mental health screenings for "consumers of all ages," including preschool children. The Commission cited Teen Screen as a "model program." From early on, this screening program always smacked of a way to deliver millions of teenage children into the waiting arms of pharmaceutical marketers. The Commission recommended that mental illness treatments should follow a certain standard medication protocol and chose the now infamous Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP) as its model.

If the model acted like it was set up by the pharmaceutical industry, it’s because it basically was, requiring, among other things, that physicians treat patients with the newest, most expensive brand-name antidepressants and antipsychotics over older, cheaper, some might say "proven" drugs. The adoption of the Texas Medication Algorithm Project was a boon for the pharmaceutical industry, causing the cost of psychotropic medication for Medicaid — the U.S. federal healthcare program for people on low incomes — to increase sharply. The Lone Star State spent millions on developing and promoting the guidelines, supported by funding that came partly from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, which has half its assets invested in the drug giant Johnson and Johnson…

Undoubtedly, mental health problems around the world cause immense human suffering and misery, and there are few jurisdictions anywhere in the world where there is adequate support for and treatment of people with mental illness. But with mental screening programs and all their attendant problems, one is left wondering if identifying more and more people as mentally sick is really the way to go to reduce the level of human misery.

Alan Cassels is a drug policy researcher at the University of Victoria and is co-author of Selling Sickness. This is the fourth in a series of articles on medical screening by Alan Cassels. He once drafted a consumer’s guide to online genetic testing which you can find it on his website here.
TMAP has been so thoroughly dubunked as a massive scheme to sell unnecessary drugs that we forget that it’s still alive as a US Government program in the form of Teen Screen. That Teen Screen continues to exist is indefensible. It was a scheme to open up pharmaceutical markets in the era before it was clear that SSRIs were definitely not a good idea for adolescents. Is the government going to pay for mass psychotherapy? Not likely. Teen Screen was cynical intrusion by a cynical industry and remains only as a monument to the people who brought us TMAP [and STAR-D, and COMED, and all the other algorithms recommending medications for profit, not for patients].
  1.  
    Allen
    August 1, 2011 | 9:32 AM
     

    Mickey,
    In October of 2005 it was my pleasure to sit across the table from Director Charles Currie at a meeting in DC and hear him announce that the Federal MH agency, SAMSHA, was withdrawing its support from both TMAP and Teen Screen. I was one of a group of advocates applying pressure on Currie regarding these issues.

    Currie had been the head of the Pennsylvania Mental Health system before Bush tapped him to head SAMSHA. He had welcomed the TMAP program to Pennsylvania and had been supporting it at the national level with generous federal funding. PA officials had refused to allow me to interview Currie, so it was VERY sweet to be in the room when TMAP went down at the federal level.

    We know that TMAP has been caving in everywhere, but Teen Screen is still alive and well, even without federal support and funding. It, too, needs to be stomped out of existence.

    Article RE Currie’s announcement:
    http://whistleblower.org/press/press-release-archive/2005/1245-government-drops-corrupt-mental-illness-drug-program

    GAP newsletter (page 7)
    http://209.200.93.225/doc/gap/GAP%202005%20Winter%20Newsletter.pdf

  2.  
    Allen
    August 1, 2011 | 9:42 AM
     

    This link quotes Currie in disavowing Teen Screen.
    http://www.ahrp.org/infomail/05/10/24.php

  3.  
    Peggi
    August 1, 2011 | 5:19 PM
     

    I only did a cursory check on their web site but I believe that the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention also promotes Teen Screen (and for college students AND for graduate students). Guess who’s on their Board of Directors? Charles Nemeroff. And I think possibly that Gordon Smith, a former senator who tragically lost a son to suicide, may also be working with AFSP to promote the screening. I think the Smith family is VERY well intentioned and certainly speaks from personal experience, but this is like having a child suffer emotionally/psychologically and accessing the traditional mental health system and pretty quickly being sucked in to psychopharmacology in a major way without having had the opportunity to learn to be skeptical and to learn to question the “conventional wisdom” from a major medical specialty. When you’re engulfed in flames, questioning the hand offering to rescue you is virtually impossible. As a parent when you did all the child development research and all the parenting books, you did not gravitate to books with titles like “what to do when your child is screwed up in a scary way”. Well, there are no books with titles like that, but if there were, you wouldn’t be reading them “just in case”.

  4.  
    Joe
    August 6, 2011 | 9:24 AM
     

    What outcomes does TeenScreen claim for those screened positive for depression and referred to treatment? Given the nature, timing, availability and effectiveness of depression treatment in the community what outcomes can it establish?

    The National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare’s July 5, 2011 Press Release, National Council Launches Project to Improve Depression Treatment includes “….. less than one-third of people who seek help receive minimally adequate care.”

    Link: http://www.thenationalcouncil.org/cs/press_releases/national_council_launches_project_to_improve_depression_treatment_

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.