Your honor, we call Allen Jones…

Posted on Friday 13 January 2012

Our second day at the trial started much like the first – same cast with different suits and ties. The lawyers were joking back and forth. The judge came in and asked one of the media guys to put up a "j-peg" he was sending, then took the lawyers behind the screen for a conference about something. The graphic was  a picture of "Buster," his siamese cat looking inscrutable on the bed [the joke in the audience was that it was Steven Shon’s cats]. The first hour were video testimony from Nancy BirchSmith and Bill Struyk, both from Janssen’s Reimbursement Management. The topic was Janssen’s funding of Dr. Shon’s travels to push TMAP. Ms. Birchsmith was defensive, Struyk wasn’t. The issue was why did they fund him. We all know why they funded him, so there wasn’t much learned in that first hour – at least for me.

After the break around 10:30 AM, they called Allen Jones to the stand. He’s has a ruddy complexion, a short greying beard, and he seemed eager to tell his story. Most of us who have followed his case have read Allen Jones’ Statement on the Internet. In 2002, he returned to the Pennsylvania Office of the inspector general where he had worked a decade earlier, having left to be closer to home. His first assignment was to investigate a complaint against Steven Fiorello, then Director of Pharmacy Services in the Office of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services. There was an alleged account that was off the books. What Jones found was a checking account controlled by Fiorello with two payments from Janssen Pharmaceuticals to Harriburg Hospital. He consulted his supervisor,  and they agreed to contact Janssen where he learned that these checks were grants to bring Dr. Steven Shon of the Texas Medical Algorithm Project to Pennsylvania [considering setting up a similar program in Pennsylvania – PENNMAP].

This off the books transaction was a red flag for Jones, and he began to look into TMAP and discovered that the Texas principles in TMAP had strong ties to Janssen, and the program was promoting expensive drugs over the generic alternatives. He updated his supervisor who told him to back off, that this was a personnel issue and he should stick to that only and forget about TMAP and Janssen. At this point, I’ll turn the story over to Bloomberg who covered the trial today:
J&J Whistle-Blower Recounts Firing After Finding Payments
Bloomberg

By David Voreacos, Margaret Cronin Fisk and Jef Feeley
January 12, 2012

A whistle-blower who sued Johnson & Johnson over the marketing of its antipsychotic Risperdal said he was fired after probing company payments to a top pharmacist in Pennsylvania’s government who hid the money. Allen Jones testified today in Austin, Texas, that he was an investigator in the Pennsylvania Office of Inspector General in 2002 when he looked into an unregistered bank account run by Steven Fiorello, the pharmacist. Fiorello was on a Pennsylvania committee weighing whether to require doctors to give priority to newer, more expensive drugs like Risperdal in state-funded treatment of mental-health patients, Jones said.

Jones, 57, said he found a $4,000 check from J&J’s Janssen unit to Harrisburg State Hospital that was sent “to the attention of” Fiorello. The check covered a Fiorello trip to New Orleans to discuss Pennsylvania’s drug guidelines. Another check for $1,766 to the hospital account was sent “in care of” of Fiorello, Jones said. Fiorello controlled the account and didn’t register it with the state, Jones said. “The account was used to deposit money from drug companies,” Jones said in the trial’s third day of testimony. “There were real problems here. On many levels, the account was improper.”

Janssen also paid $2,000 directly to Fiorello as an honorarium for his speaking at a company-sponsored event in 2002, Jones said. Jones said he followed the money trail and explored efforts by Janssen to promote, on a state-by-state basis, Texas guidelines favoring drugs like Risperdal. The funds sent to the hospital account helped pay travel expenses for programs related to setting up the Texas guidelines in Pennsylvania, he said…

The state adopted the guidelines that favored Risperdal in 2003, Jones said. In 2004, Jones filed a whistle-blower lawsuit in Texas, which the state later joined, claiming J&J defrauded the state by overhyping Risperdal and overbilling its Medicaid program by at least $579 million… Fiorello, once the chief pharmacist for Pennsylvania’s public welfare department, was convicted in December 2008 of felony conflict-of-interest charges for taking payments from drug companies, including Janssen and Pfizer Inc. He was sentenced to 18 months of probation and fined $3,000. He also paid more than $27,000 in civil fines after the Pennsylvania Ethics Commission cited him…

Jurors heard earlier that Steven Shon, a physician who served as medical director of the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, signed several consulting agreements with Janssen. The company paid him $47,587 over several years as he promoted the Texas Medication Algorithm Project, or TMAP, guidelines around the U.S., including in Pennsylvania. TMAP urged doctors to give preference to new antipsychotics like Risperdal.

Jones said he interviewed Janssen employees in 2002, and they told him they found no grant request for the payments of $4,000 and $1,766, which was “a real red flag for me,” Jones said. He also said Fiorello could not receive an honorarium under state regulations. “The receipt of an honorarium by a public employee who acts in his official capacity is a felony,” Jones said. He said Janssen employees said that company policy barred giving honorariums to state employees. “They said they were unaware of this check and they didn’t know how it had happened,” Jones said.

Asked about the meaning of the payments that went to the account, Jones said, “It meant that the state was going to be spending a whole lot more money for antipsychotics.” J&J, based in New Brunswick, New Jersey, is the world’s largest health-care products company. Jones said his boss told him to ease off his probe. He said he was told, “Stay away from the drug companies. This is a personnel issue. Stay away from the drug companies, stay away from TMAP.”

Jones said his boss said, “Drug companies write checks to both sides of the aisle. Stay away from it.” His boss told him that “morally and ethically I was correct, but politically, this was dead”… Jones said that later he was removed as the lead investigator from the case, and he was “marginalized completely.” He continued to pursue the case on his own time, and spoke to the New York Times for a story that ran Feb. 1, 2004. He said he was fired for talking to the newspaper. He sued in Texas in 2004. He could collect from 15 percent to 25 percent of any recovery that Texas gets at the trial. Jones said he also settled a freedom of speech civil rights lawsuit and a retaliation suit with Pennsylvania. With the settlement, he said he paid his debts, bought a truck, filled his propane tanks and had $1,200 left. On cross-examination, Jones said he sued in Texas before he was fired after trying unsuccessfully in Pennsylvania to pursue the case.

I expect everyone in the courtroom knew the story, but Jones’ personal testimony was riveting nonetheless as he described his dawning awareness of the breadth of what he had run across, and his supervisor escalated the admonishments to drop the story.

The part not in that article was the emotional climate of the courtroom. Initially anxious, as his testimony progressed, Jones seemed to become more relaxed. Then you could see his frustration mounting as he recounted going from place to place trying to get someone to listen to him for over a year, as he was removed from the case and transferred to another team, as he was repeatedly ignored. PENNMAP was scheduled to roll out in "one fell swoop" with hospitalized patients all changed over to Atypical Antipsychotics. He told the Jury that he felt that the patients were "being betrayed by the people who were supposed to be taking care of them. I couldn’t be a part of that. So I blew the whistle." That’s when he went to the New York Times.

The Judge announced a break, and Jones rose quickly and seemed to be trying to pace off the tension of his ten year Hegira with this suit. There was none of the casualness among the assembled legal teams that usually filled the spaces. I went outside into the cold air that had descended overnight and thought about why I’d flown out here to Texas. I said before it was to make it "real" – to hear the "tree falling in the forest." I thought about the things that happened in my specialty of psychiatry, the stealth and deceit from the small but [in my opinion] toxic segment that participated. And I thought about the phrase "betrayed by the people who were supposed to be taking care of them."

The cross examination was hostile, not very productive. Jones handled himself well and the lawyer doing the cross examination got a private conference with the judge for brow beating him. The afternoon session was videotaped Janssen employees being queried about Dr. Shon and a former Texas public health psychiatrist who quit because of Dr. Shon’s antics. They were interesting, but anticlimactic in comparison to Jones’ testimony. I spent the afternoon still thinking about "betrayed by the people who were supposed to be taking care of them." Whether that was a dramatic line inserted by his lawyers or his own actual feeling [which I think was the case], it doesn’t really matter,  because it’s the essence of the problem at hand. He saw it with clarity and did the right thing – he told us about it…
  1.  
    aek
    January 13, 2012 | 5:34 AM
     

    The norm for whistle blowers is that they get sick and die. This man is effectively ostracized. Observing him without supporting him in a real and personal manner just perpetuates the ostrcism. Whether or not he eventually wins a monetary award will not mitigate his suffering.

    The only person to date who has written about the narratives of whistle blowers is C Fred Alford. I quote a salient piece of the whistle-blower’s experience as writen by him at the link at my name.

    The quote you used about the betrayal strikes home for me. I am so sorry for this man. I don’t know how to help him – if I did, I would selfishly help myself, as well. It’s hell on earth.

  2.  
    January 13, 2012 | 10:30 AM
     

    Allen Jones can stand proudly with James Wetta, Cheryl Eckard, the Ven-A-Care group and others who stood up against the pharmaceutical industry on behalf of those betrayed by the deceipt, lies and unethical behaviors of people who are doctors and other workers who should know better but chose to be greedy instead.

    I applaud Allen Jones, and I hope he sees this blog and others to know we are watching with appreciation. My child suffered as a result of antipsychotic marketing to children.

    Thank you for being there in person, Mickey, as I feel somehow I am there as well, being represented as a parent.

  3.  
    Stan
    January 13, 2012 | 12:42 PM
     

    “He saw it with clarity and did the right thing – he told us about it…”

    Doing the right thing appears to be a rare lost art in our turbulent world of manipulated hazy greys …I truly applaud & appreciate the sacrifice Allen Jones is making simply for standing up to do the “RIGHT THING”. It’s so much easier said, than done…

    Thanks again for bringing us this ring side seat view of these proceedings Mickey

  4.  
    January 13, 2012 | 1:18 PM
     

    Thank you Mickey – you write so well.

  5.  
    Melody
    January 13, 2012 | 6:02 PM
     

    I, too, applaud Allen Jones and hope he recognizes that his efforts are appreciated. The tenacity and commitment to follow through, to spend day after day defending his position, to incorporate this ‘mission’ as a part of his very being is a demonstration of courage few can understand.

  6.  
    Allen
    January 13, 2012 | 6:54 PM
     

    I cannot comment on the trial in any way, but I do want to thank you all for your kind words here. God Bless you.

  7.  
    January 13, 2012 | 7:22 PM
     

    Thanks Allen, but it’s the rest of us that are in your debt. We don’t hear the words courage and integrity so often these days, but you’ve reminded us what they really mean. So thanks from all of us, and from the patients who don’t even know what you did for them. That’s the most important part. They don’t really have their own voice…

  8.  
    January 13, 2012 | 8:09 PM
     

    Allen, on behalf of injured patients, thank you so much for what you’ve done. One door closes and another opens. You will have new friends and allies. You may have met a few already.

    Mickey, thank you for having the fire to pursue this story all the way to Texas.

  9.  
    Peggi
    January 13, 2012 | 8:48 PM
     

    Allen and Mickey both: my deepest gratitude. Thank you. As a parent seeking to help my child while trying to avoid further harm to her, thank you.

  10.  
    Fid
    January 14, 2012 | 3:21 AM
     

    The opposition will do everything in their power to make life uncomfortable for Allen Jones. It sends out a clear message to future whistleblowers. Allen Jones is indeed a rare breed, he has values that are nothing to do with the dollar. I salute you Sir.

  11.  
    Daun Klinger
    January 16, 2012 | 8:38 AM
     

    Knowing Allen Jones and what he has been willing to sacrifice for this case is astonishing. Allen, all I can say is, stick by your word, and if all else fails – God is on your side! Bless you

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.