ear worms…

Posted on Friday 23 March 2012

Ear Worms can be a dreadful affliction – some song that plays over and over in your head that your don’t even know is there until it begins to drive you nuts. I am one of the afflicted and I have to figure out how they got there to be free of them. Recently, the theme song from the old Maverick TV show almost took me out [I saw a blurb about Jody Foster, she was in the movie version, that’s what got it started]. I’m finally free of Whitney Houston’s "I will always love you" [source obvious]. Sometimes, it’s a poem – almost always T.S. Eliot, my favorite. This time, it was sing-song versions of "Here we go round the prickly pear" or "This is the way the world ends." Both from "The Hollow Men." They’ve played intermittently for days.

As a teenager and college student, I loved that kind of literature. It was, I think, a respit from the business of being one of the guys, or hormone driven, whatever the right words are for living among peers in the years before adulthood. Not that I minded youth, but I think the writers like Faulkner, Hemingway, Woolf, or Eliot reminded me that there was something more to existence than the right-now-ness of adolescence and early adulthood. For me, "The Hollow Men" was my high school Eliot. It fit with the postwar fifties I was living in, which did have something of a background absurd feeling. "The Wasteland" was my college Eliot, the early sixties before all hell broke loose. And "The Four Quartets" followed, to this day an abiding source of reflection. But recently, it has been my old high school Eliot – "The Hollow Men" singing in my head.

When I was in high school, it was about them, those hollow fifties types that the Beatniks were dropping out to get away from, me too. But as I’ve gotten older, I tend more to think that such poems are more important to think about as relating to personal experience. After all, it does start with the word "We." And I now think of this poem as the the feelings one goes through when a great disillusionment of one sort or another sets in. I remember a professor once talking about the beginning of section V. [column three] like this:
    These lines parody a children’s song that is derived from a fertility dance  done around a mulberry bush ‘on a cold and frosty morning’. A prickly pear is a desert cactus, continuing the desert imagery that is particularly prevalent at the beginning of the third section of the poem. 5:00am is the traditional time of Christ’s resurrection.  In a 1923 review Eliot quoted Frazer on "how often with the decay of old faiths the serious rites and pageants .. [primitive, religious dances] have degenerated into the sports of children." Here he has further perverted the children’s song by turning it into a modern infertility dance.  By performing an infertility dance at the moment of resurrection, we are in effect blocking and rejecting the salvation it can bring.
Something like trying to hold on to the early enthusiasm one felt for something at its beginning, but not long before facing directly that it failed – when even happy talk doesn’t work anymore and there’s a dirge playing in the background. And then in section V. we come to the "betweens" – the Shadow that falls between the high expectations early on and their later tarnished reality. We humans don’t face failure or disillusionment with ease, and fight it sometimes to the death. Eliot wrote "The Hollow Men" in 1925, after "The Wasteland," both after the Great War [WWI]. He was living in post-war England during the roarin’ twenties about to become a citizen there, but he knew the carnage of WWI had solved nothing and that World War II loomed up ahead. Like most, he could just feel it. It’s what Churchill called the Gathering Storm.

Of course in this case, my ear worm has to do with what I’ve been writing about here – the DSM-5 Revision, the madness of the pharmaceutical invasion of psychiatry, and all of the absurd things that have gone on in these years. What’s the other possibility? And the era is coming to the end now – whatever it has been about.  So here’s the poem:

The Hollow Men
T.S. Eliot 1925

I

We are the hollow men
We are the stuffed men
Leaning together
Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!
Our dried voices, when
We whisper together
Are quiet and meaningless
As wind in dry grass
Or rats’ feet over broken glass
In our dry cellar

Shape without form, shade without
   colour,
Paralysed force, gesture without
   motion;

Those who have crossed
With direct eyes, to death’s
   other Kingdom
Remember us — if at all
   — not as lost
Violent souls, but only
As the hollow men
The stuffed men.

II

Eyes I dare not meet in dreams
In death’s dream kingdom
These do not appear:
There, the eyes are
Sunlight on a broken column
There, is a tree swinging
And voices are
In the wind’s singing
More distant and more solemn
Than a fading star.

Let me be no nearer
In death’s dream kingdom
Let me also wear
Such deliberate disguises
Rat’s coat, crowskin, crossed staves
In a field

Behaving as the wind behaves
No nearer —

Not that final meeting
In the twilight kingdom

III

This is the dead land
This is cactus land
Here the stone images
Are raised, here they receive
The supplication of a dead
   man’s hand
Under the twinkle of a
   fading star.

Is it like this
In death’s other kingdom
Waking alone
At the hour when we are
Trembling with tenderness
Lips that would kiss
Form prayers to broken stone.

IV

The eyes are not here
There are no eyes here
In this valley of dying stars
In this hollow valley
This broken jaw of our
   lost kingdoms

In this last of meeting places
We grope together
And avoid speech
Gathered on this beach of the
   tumid river

Sightless, unless
The eyes reappear
As the perpetual star
Multifoliate rose
Of death’s twilight kingdom
The hope only

Of empty men.

V

Here we go round the
   prickly pear
Prickly pear prickly pear
Here we go round the
   prickly pear
At five o’clock in the morning.

Between the idea
And the reality
Between the motion
And the act
Falls the Shadow

For Thine is the Kingdom

Between the conception
And the creation
Between the emotion
And the response
Falls the Shadow

Life is very long

Between the desire
And the spasm
Between the potency
And the existence
Between the essence
And the descent
Falls the Shadow
For Thine is the Kingdom

For Thine is
Life is
For Thine is the

This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper.

As a youth, I had no understanding of the last four lines. I guess I thought endings were like football games or the end of World War II. The bad guys surrendered. Truth, justice, and the American way won out in the end. I was older before I got it that "the cold war" was just a continuation of whatever all of that had been about. There was no "bang," just a whimpering transition. And closer to home, disillusionments, failed hopes, things like that didn’t come in a catclysmic moment – they just became whimpers and faded into the next thing – marked mostly with memories.  At least that’s they way it has been for me in those situations.

In spite of the negativity I’ve felt about their version of psychiatry, I surprisingly feel some empathy for Dr. Kupfer et al with their DSM-5. They had such high hopes of using the DSM-5 to usher in a dreamed-of age when psychiatry would join the ranks of the great medical specialties – clinical neuroscience with diagnostic lab tests like angiograms or anti-nuclear antibodies and interventions with the specificity of Insulin, Cycloserine, or stents. They thought that with brain imaging and genetic testing, the biological basis of mental illnesses would move from the realm of speculation to known, measurable fact. The borrowed concepts of evidence-based medicine, measurement-based medicine, translational science, personalized medicine, etc. would be the keys that opened the long closed doors to the halls of hard science. They really wanted the medicines to work better than they actually do. It didn’t happen, and it’s not even just around the corner. There’s some biology under there sure enough, but less than they thought and a lot of it more deeply buried than their current reach. The Shadow has fallen · Between the idea · And the reality. So with the rhetoric of their 2002 book [A Research Agenda for DSM-V], they sound very much like The Hollow Men · Headpiece filled with straw. And as much bru-ha-ha as there is right now about the DSM-5, the bottom line is This is the way the world ends · Not with a bang but a whimper. The DSM-5 is already irrelevant.

I was going to keep this post to myself. Afraid of looking like a dinosaur shrink or being corny, but what the hell. It just occurred to me again that what’s happening right now is one of the faces of grief. It’s called denial – fighting the acknowledgment that something that really mattered to them is already gone, hiding from the very loud whimper of its absence. I’ve been there and it’s pretty painful, no matter how strong your belief in the illusion. That’s a concrete part of their story right now, the denial of grief. They may be able to drag things out for a while, like the years between the wars, but that won’t ultimately change anything because it has already happened, and it’s not going to keep them from feeling bad. I wonder if there’s anyone among them or on the Board of Trustees of the APA that can help them find a way to accept their disappointment and let it whimper instead of forcing the rest of us to have to put it in front of them day after day…
  1.  
    March 23, 2012 | 8:50 PM
     

    In Those Years

    In those years, peo­ple will say, we lost track
    of the mean­ing of we, of you
    we found our­selves
    reduced to I
    and the whole thing became
    silly, ironic, ter­ri­ble:
    we were try­ing to live a per­sonal life
    and yes, that was the only life
    we could bear wit­ness to

    But the great dark birds of his­tory screamed and plunged
    into our per­sonal weather
    They were headed some­where else but their beaks and pin­ions drove
    along the shore, through the rags of fog
    where we stood, say­ing I.

    ~ adri­enne rich

    Who were we to think we could overcome the failure of a race?

  2.  
    Phil
    March 24, 2012 | 2:54 AM
     

    I appreciate your blog.

    If psychiatrists becomes depressed because the medications don’t work very well, will they nevertheless take the medications themselves to try to reduce their own depression? Does that mean they will finally try “a taste of their own medicine”?

    “In other news” (if you don’t mind my adding this here), I’m curious what you think of the recent widely-reported research about how ECT works for depression: that it reduces “excessive connectivity” between certain parts of the brain. From what I could tell from news articles, the researchers didn’t compare the connectivity in depressed people vs. controls, but simply compared connectivity before and after ECT. This seems potentially like the same kind of mistake that was made for SSRIs and serotonin levels, assuming that whatever treatment change you can measure must be the change that’s helping, without confirming whether insufficient serotonin (or excessive connectivity between certain regions) is associated with depression for those patients in the first place. But I’m not familiar with this research area.

  3.  
    March 24, 2012 | 11:50 AM
     

    Uggh, ECT. Trouble with this is there no evidence of safety and efficacy. The FDA ruled this last year during their reclassification hearings. Linda Andre did a good book on it called Doctors of Deception. It outlines how APA has worked through public relations and not science to spread ECT. It’s hard for ECT survivors like me to see my friends with permanent cognitive damage just get ignored and invalidated. It’s a super hot button topic in the recovery movement.

    As for poetry – this is my Disability Industrial Complex poem. Thank you to all who made it possible. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPpkBA2ITZ4

  4.  
    Phil
    March 25, 2012 | 1:25 AM
     

    Corinna, I’ve read and appreciated your blog posts on madinamerica.com. I realize that ECT is a hot topic, I’ve personally seen a lot of people not be helped by it, and I was encouraged by the FDA ruling last year. I was just a bit surprised that after the recent press flurry about a new study claiming to explain “how ECT works”, I haven’t yet seen any articles or posts examining that claim from a more critical perspective.

  5.  
    March 25, 2012 | 5:37 PM
     

    Dr. Mickey, I’ve often thought biopsychiatry is now on the wrong side of history.

    I guess the question is how long it will take for it all to unwind — public pillorying of the neurotransmitter imbalance theory; efficacy no better than placebo; failure of genetics research; fantasies about brain scans; grasping at “inflammation” as a cause for mental disorder.

    Now there’s a fad explanation for the comparative effectiveness of placebo: Antidepressants are effective, but people consciously or unconsciously resist the beneficial effect. Doctors have to get them to stop fighting it and permit the drug to do its work.

    Surely this is reasoning from a field that is intellectually bankrupt.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.