modern times…

Posted on Saturday 12 January 2013

Charlie Chaplin’s last Little Tramp movie was also his first polemic – about the depersonalization of the assembly line worker – becoming just a cog in an industrial machine. It’s our favorite of his movies now, but in 1936 it got him labeled by many as a commie sympathizer. It’s ironic to look back on, but the meme of modern life as a villain is common throughout the ages. As a kid, I noticed that adults often talked of the good old days, implying that things were formerly right, and now they’re wrong. It annoyed me, talking about my times like that, and I resolved that when I got old, I wouldn’t do it [it turns out to be harder than I thought – things like rap music and derivative trading get to me].

Yesterday, I saw a case in the clinic that set me thinking about Modern Times. The patient was a young woman who had an episode four years ago where she couldn’t speak, only make stuttering sounds following a bad headache. It lasted for days. She was hospitalized and worked up, including MRIs and vascular studies. Then one day, her doctor came in, announced that it was psychogenic and discharged her. She thought that he thought that she was faking and was mad at her. The symptom cleared, but since then she has had frequent headaches when stressed and a hint of stuttering – always terrified that it will come back. She has a documenting video on her phone of that episode. I won’t go into why, but it seems likely that this was a Conversion Reaction as they thought. But she left the hospital feeling that she was being accused of conscious malingering. That’s not the Modern Times part of the story. It’s regular for people to assume that seemingly neurological symptoms that have no neurological cause are made up, particularly in a neoKraepelinian world [that’s what the word neuro·tic originally meant – neurologic-like]. Her problem was that she knew that she wasn’t faking, and felt abandoned and discounted.

But that’s not my point about Modern Times. It’s what came next. After that, she became anxious and hypervigilant that it would happen again. She was treated with Celexa 40 mg/d, Depakote 1000 mg/d, and something else I can’t recall. She said "I couldn’t think," but that wasn’t the only consequence. It turned out that she took the medications throughout the first trimester of her first pregnancy [FDA Warning]. That child has a number of birth defects and cognitive problems, now diagnosed as the Fetal Depakote Syndrome and under study at the medical center. I’d never heard of that syndrome, but it seems very real looking at the literature. The patient still has frequent headaches under stress and a fear of having it happen again. She is hardly a flaky person – if anything, the opposite. She has an obsessive-compulsive style. The stress she describes is from the chaos she finds in the workplace [and the universe].

Having been identified as a psychiatric case, she was treated with psychiatric medications [seemingly chosen at random from what I could gather]. That’s the Modern Times problem. Conscious malingering certainly happens, but that’s not what happened here. This was a Conversion Reaction of the Freudian kind – unconscious. The diagnosis was right, but the treatment was off the mark and had dire consequences:

Diagnostic criteria for 300.11 Conversion Disorder   [DSM IV – TR]

    A. One or more symptoms or deficits affecting voluntary motor or sensory function that suggest a neurological or other general medical condition. 
    B. Psychological factors are judged to be associated with the symptom or deficit because the initiation or exacerbation of the symptom or deficit is preceded by conflicts or other stressors. 
    C. The symptom or deficit is not intentionally produced or feigned [as in Factitious Disorder or Malingering]. 
    D. The symptom or deficit cannot, after appropriate investigation, be fully explained by a general medical condition, or by the direct effects of a substance, or as a culturally sanctioned behavior or experience. 
    E. The symptom or deficit causes clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning or warrants medical evaluation. 
    F. The symptom or deficit is not limited to pain or sexual dysfunction, does not occur exclusively during the course of Somatization Disorder, and is not better accounted for by another mental disorder.

Even though the DSM-IV is clear about Conversion Disorder, this is not an era when unconscious mental life is on anyone’s radar. She is, herself, aware that her headaches and "stressed out" feelings come when her obligatory precision and orderliness are challenged by the rush hour mayhem at a fast food restaurants where she’s worked. It was interesting that when I asked, "Any OCD stuff with you?" She said "No." But when I described what I meant, it was clear that was the primary problem. There were cascades of rules about how things are placed, what can touch what, obligatory sequencing, quaisimagical rituals, etc. And the chaos of her life as a child seemed pertinent to why they might have developed. But I wander from the thread, the point is about Modern Times.

In Modern Times, I shouldn’t even mention a case because of HIPAA regulations [Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act] – concerns about privacy. In Modern Times, cases deemed psychiatric are pretty universally treated with psychopharmacology. In Modern Times we don’t talk about unconscious mental life and Conversion Reactions much anymore.  I think my biggest complaint about Modern Times is close to Charlie Chaplin’s 1936 complaint – something about the impersonality of today’s medicine and psychiatry with patients caught up in the depersonalization of treatment by diagnostic group rather than one case at a time. She’d have been a lot better off in the good old days…
  1.  
    January 12, 2013 | 7:13 PM
     

    Mental health is doomed, and it starts with the majority of our own freakin’ colleagues who do nothing to take a stand against the disruptive, demeaning, and absurd stances that so many different intrusions take against standards of care.

    Think about it for a minute. First, psychiatry was told they could not provide psychotherapy anymore, unless taking such a harsh cut in reimbursement, it would be suicidal from a financial point of view. Then, how many other alleged disciplines in psychotherapy stepped in and AGREED to provide therapy at such obscenely low reimbursement fees, patients were basically told “talk is cheap”!

    Oh, we won’t waste space talking about which diagnoses would deserve reimbursements, and what meds would be authorized to use for the limited interventions we could and still minimally provide now.

    Then, everyone with an ability to prescribe felt they were competent and able to write for psychotropics like pez, and our OWN colleagues not only accepted this, they agreed to be supervisors for those who could not do so alone! Then, pharma finished the sabotage with selling this failed premise of “biochemical imbalance”, and every psychiatrist who was watching their income stream said “what the hell, let’s do 15, or even 10 minute med checks and get paid $50-60 a patient and that will pay the bills, if not pay for the q3month vacations still.

    Finally, what are we left with today? 70% + of antidepressants are written by nonpsychiatrists, psychiatrists have stupidly pigeon holed themselves to med checks and now are bound to these absurd E/M codes which will only put them at risk for fraud if they continue 15 min med checks and bill for same time therapy codes, or worse will make them think they should accept even more decreases in reimbursement that insurers will force more non psychiatrists to be considered primary psychiatry sources. Then, we have therapists who are doing 20-30 minute therapy visits to make up for the cuts they AGREED to in past times to provide what they call therapy, and the impact on treatment is so woeful, patients legitimately can ask why see a therapist when they can get more impact from a friend or neighbor. Oh, and what has the APA done to support the field? Ok the slime that is CPT, and then the horrendous impact that DSM 5 will shit on the field.

    Oh, and don’t forget Kupfer gleefully notes an edition of DSM 5 written for non psychiatrists to use. If you haven’t figured it out by now in my writings, if the APA exploded tomorrow and disappeared, that would be a gift from god to me!

    So, Modern Times are olden times for me. The sabotage, backstabbing, lack of advocacy from multiple disciplines in mental health, and now the recurring bad press by alleged mental health people committing multi murders across the country, what are people to think about accessing, much less benefiting from mental health care? Jack squat, and I don’t blame them one bit.

    I will do my job as trained, and I see us so marginalized by 2016, the only psychiatrists who can stay in the field then will be doing one of the following:

    community mental health outpatient, correctional work, addiction services, inpatient for acute and chronic state run care facilities, and outpatient forensic work for the elite few who will make every accused criminal find a way to claim they are mentally impaired, and have a stooge testify if paid well enough.

    Oh, and that is if the country is not overrun with so much dependency and entitlement that the basic business community does not shut down and we are basically a communist community.

    Obama is an antisocial element, and his minions will sell the false message of take from others and just serve the elite few. Who the f— won’t be crazy and impaired living in this desecration of society by the end of his term?!

    Modern Times? Nah, it is Misfit times, going on for many years now!!!

    Sorry for the rant, but it had to be said. Thank you for the opportunity to voice my opinion, feel free to do so at my site if interested!

  2.  
    berit bj
    January 13, 2013 | 8:13 AM
     

    Where the bait is, eagles are feeding…
    a verse by the Norwegian poet Paal Helge Haugen.

    I quoted this to an openminded shrink in my country. His immediate answer: Eagles are birds of prey and vultures.

    Crazy times. Ever more eagles on the prey…

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.