policy…

Posted on Tuesday 7 June 2016

I expect most readers are as phobic about reading health care policy as I am. But about once a century, I try to look in on what’s happening – operating on the principle that if I don’t keep up a little, I can’t complain when it happens. This post is about the programs the Federal Government is incentivizing called Health Homes for the States to build from in creating their own Medicaire Programs in the wake of the Affordable Care Act:
The Medicaid Health Home State Plan Option, authorized under the Affordable Care Act [Section 2703], allows states to design health homes to provide comprehensive care coordination for Medicaid beneficiaries with chronic conditions. States will receive enhanced federal funding during the first eight quarters of implementation to support the roll out of this new integrated model of care.

[participating states so far]
My interest here is how this particular version tries to deal with what actually constitutes expectable Mental Health Care. In reading the whole thing, it seems to count on on an intact Mental Health Center system to take care of severe mental illness or emergencies, so they focus on only outpatient care for Medicaire recipients. They’re trying to come up with some kind of compromise plan focusing on what they perceive to be the underserved or badly served:
…"only around 40 percent of Americans with a diagnosable mental illness received any specific mental health treatment in the prior year, and only around one-third of those – therefore, approximately one in seven overall – received treatment that could be characterized as minimally adequate based on practice guidelines."
"… and many of these patients do not receive these medications in sufficient doses or for a sufficient duration; while others continue to use medications even if they are not effective for them, rather than having their treatment adjusted, due to lack of regular monitoring and clinical inertia. As a result, as few as 20 percent of patients started on antidepressant medications in usual primary care show substantial clinical improvements. Many patients referred to psychotherapy receive an insufficient number of visits and/or ineffective forms of psychotherapy, so that treatment response for this type of treatment is also as low as 20 percent under usual care. Finally, poor quality of medical care in patients with mental illness may explain a significant portion of their excess mortality."
So what I’ve done below is pull out the bare bones from some of their very long documents about the government’s version of Collaborative Care au Medicaire. How the system actually works is not totally clear here, but it’s not clearer if you read all the pages. The States submit their own plans for approval – this is the template. As above, a number of States have implemented it and they’re all somewhat different. I’m going to hold judgement for a bit and cogitate. This, or something like this, is going to be the program for a whole lot of people.

By Jürgen Unützer, Henry Harbin, Michael Schoenbaum, and Benjamin Druss.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  • Depression and other common mental disorders are common, disabling, and associated with high health care costs and substantial losses in productivity. Yet only about 25 percent of patients with these disorders receive effective care.
  • Only 20 percent of adult patients with mental health disorders are seen by mental health specialists and many prefer and receive treatment in primary care settines.
  • Individuals with serious and persistent mental illnesses are more likely to be seen by specialty mental health providers, but they have limited access to effective medical care and high mortality rates.underscoring the need for better connections across primary care and mental health.
  • The collaborative care model is an evidence-based approach for integrating physical and behavioral health services that can be implemented within a primary care-based Medicaid health home model, among other settings.
  • Collaborative care includes:
    1. care coordination and care management;
    2. regular/proactive monitoring and treatment to target using validated clinical rating scales; and
    3. regular, systematic psychiatric caseload reviews and consultation for patients who do not show clinical improvement.
  • More than 70 randomized controlled trials have shown collaborative care for common mental disorders such as depression to be more effective and cost-effective than usual care, across diverse practice settings and patient populations. Collaborative care programs have been implemented by large health care organizations and health plans in both commercially insured and low income/safety-net populations.Traditional fee-for-service reimbursement programs have been a barrier to widespread implementation of collaborative care, but new* reimbursement models using capitated, case-rate payments, or pay-for-performance mechanisms may provide opportunities to expand its use.
  • Implementation of evidence-based collaborative care in Medicaid – and in integrated care programs for individuals dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid- could substantially improve medical and mental health outcomes and functionins. as well as reduce health care costs.
This brief was developed for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services by the Center for Health Care Strategies and Mathematica Policy Research. For more information or technical assistance in developing health homes, visit http://www.medicaid.gov.

Job Description: Psychiatric Consultant

JOB SUMMARY
The consulting psychiatrist is responsible for supporting behavioral health care provided in primary care settings by a team comprised of primary care and behavioral health providers.

DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

  1. Provide regularly scheduled [usually weekly] caseload consultation to behavioral health care managers [CMs]. These consultations are typically conducted by telephone and focus primarily on patients who are new to treatment or who are not improving as expected.
  2. Provide occasional telephonic consultation to primary care providers [PCPs] as needed, focusing on patients in the CMs caseload.
  3. Work with assigned CMs to track and oversee their patient panels and clinical outcomes using an electronic registry or other type of system capable of tracking clinical processes and patient outcomes.
  4. Suggest treatment plan changes, including medication recommendations for patients who are not improving as expected.
  5. Discuss patients who need referral for additional specialty mental health care [e.g., to a community mental health center] and advise on treatment plans until patients are engaged in such care.
  6. Use a population-focused registry to document recommendations for treatment and/or referrals within 24 hours of consulting with a CM so that they can be easily shared with PCPs and other treating providers.
  7. Clearly communicate to CMs and PCPs the limitations of the consultation and treatment recommendations if you did not evaluate the client in person. Include the following disclaimer statement acknowledging these limitations in all consult notes:
      The above treatment considerations and suggestions are based on consultation with the patient’s care manager and a review of information available in registry. I have not personally examined the patient. All recommendations should be implemented with consideration of the patient’s relevant prior history and current clinical status. Please feel free to call me with any questions about the care of this patient.
  8. Maintain professional cell phone and Email accounts for contact during usual business hours.
  9. Respond to telephone calls from primary care providers and CMs within one business day. Respond to urgent telephone calls within one hour, if available.
  10. Check professional Email account daily. Respond to Email questions/consultations within two business days, sooner if urgent.
  11. Coordinate with other consulting psychiatrists for vacation coverage.
  12. When possible, visit each participating clinic at least once when initiating a new consulting relationship and then at least once per year to meet clinic providers and discuss ongoing collaboration.
OPTIONAL ACTIVITIES
  1. Direct evaluation of patients
    Direct evaluation of patients, focusing on clients with diagnostic or therapeutic challenges who are identified in discussion with the patient’s CM and/or PCP. Such consultation may be provided in person or via telemedicine .
  2. Training
    This may involve development and delivery of in-service training for primary care-based providers and staff regarding current understanding of best practices for the recognition and treatment of behavioral health conditions in primary care.

Job Description: Care Manager

JOB SUMMARY
The care manager functions as a core member of a collaborative care team that involves the patient’s primary care provider, a consulting psychiatrist and, when available, other mental health providers in the primary care clinic. The care manager is responsible for coordinating and supporting mental health care provided in the primary care clinic. He/she is also responsible for coordinating referrals to clinically indicated services outside the primary care clinic [e.g., social services, mental health specialty care, substance abuse treatment]. The care manager may provide evidence ? based treatments or work with other mental health providers when such treatment is indicated.
    "Care management staff, such as a nurse, clinical social worker, or psychologist, who is based in primary care and trained to provide evidence-based care coordination, brief behavioral interventions, and to support the treatments such as medications initiated by the PCP. In some implementations of collaborative care, this staff also provides evidence-based, brief/structured psychotherapy, such as cognitive behavioral therapy."
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
  1. Support and closely coordinate mental health care with the patient’s primary care provider and, when appropriate, other treating mental health providers.
  2. Screen and assess patients for common mental health and substance abuse disorders.
  3. Provide patient education about common mental health and substance abuse disorders and available treatment options.
  4. Monitor patients [in person or by telephone] for changes in clinical symptoms and treatment side effects or complications.
  5. Support psychotropic medication management prescribed by PCPs, focusing on treatment adherence, side effects and other complications, and effectiveness of treatment.
  6. Provide brief interventions using evidence-based techniques such as behavioral activation, problem-solving treatment, motivational interviewing, or other treatments appropriate for primary care settings.
  7. Provide or facilitate in-clinic or outside referrals to evidence?based psychosocial treatments [e.g, CBT, IPT] as clinically indicated.
  8. Participate in regularly scheduled [usually weekly] caseload consultation with the consulting team psychiatrist and communicate resulting treatment recommendations to the patient’s PCP. These consultations will primarily focus on patients who are new to treatment or who are not improving as expected.
  9. Facilitate patient engagement and follow-up in care.
  10. Track patient follow-up and clinical outcomes using a registry. Document in person and telephone encounters in the registry and use the system to identify and reengage patients who may be lost to follow ? up.
  11. Document patient progress and treatment recommendations in the registry so that they can be easily shared with PCPs, the consulting psychiatrist, and other treating providers.
  12. Facilitate treatment plan changes for patients who are not improving as expected in consultation with the PCP and the team psychiatrist. These may include changes in medications or psychosocial treatments or appropriate referrals for additional services.
  13. Facilitate referrals for clinically indicated services outside the primary care clinic [e.g., social services such as housing assistance, vocational rehabilitation, mental health specialty care, substance abuse treatment].
  14. Complete relapse prevention plan with patients who are in remission.
  1.  
    1boringyoungman
    June 7, 2016 | 7:08 PM
     

    Oh God.

  2.  
    1boringyoungman
    June 7, 2016 | 7:20 PM
     

    “OPTIONAL ACTIVITIES
    Direct evaluation of patients”
    And so it goes…

  3.  
    Anonymous
    June 7, 2016 | 8:19 PM
     

    And, after about 4 years of this, each primary care physician involved in this arrangement effectively receives some semblance of a psychiatric residency. The consulting psychiatrists are no longer needed, and, when insurance companies and Medicare/Medicaid deem them extraneous, the psychiatrist consultant is suddenly out of a job.

    This is called training our replacements.

  4.  
    James OBrien, M.D.
    June 8, 2016 | 4:47 PM
     

    What in that job description of Psychiatric Consultant requires a three year commitment to psychiatric residency? #4 can be learned in about three months.

    However most of the other job description actually DOES require a three year psych residency.

    Are the people running institutional psychiatry incredibly dense or incredibly sycophantic to the goals of ACA (see Lieberman videos) or both?

    Or is it that psychiatrists running things, despite their training, don’t really understand how human behavior works in the real world (as opposed to theory)?

    Prepare to be replaced by an automated kiosk, much like a server at Wendy’s in the next few years.

  5.  
    Catalyzt
    June 9, 2016 | 3:10 AM
     

    As one of the “providers” practicing with a license targeted for redefinition as a “care manager” I can only participate in interventions which comply with state and federal law.

    In general, MFT’s avoid giving advice to patients except with respect to imminent safety issues. We certainly do not advocate for a particular dosage schedule or provide instructions on when to take medication or how much to take. Therefore, we could not be “focusing on treatment adherence” with respect to psychotropic medication management.

    If a client says they are not comfortable taking a certain medication at a certain dose, we cannot advise them to continue taking it– or to take more, or to take less, for that matter. That would be a breach of ethics, outside our scope of practice, and probably against the law.

    We absolutely do refer clients to their prescribing physician if they miss doses, take extra doses, or experience side effects. We would inquire about obstacles to adherence to a regimen of medication.

    But that is a distinctly different idea than *focusing on adherence*, and the distinction is not trivial.

    We also have an affirmative obligation to consult with the prescribing physician (provided the appropriate release is in place) if we feel that client was not improving with a particular medication. We absolutely do provide education about medication and side effects, and refer clients to relevant resources so they can learn more about them.

    We will encourage clients to attend regular psychotherapy sessions with psychiatrists whenever they have a parity diagnosis or any other diagnosis which has a severe negative impact on their quality of life and daily functioning. Our ethical obligation to consult is not based on the medication a patient is or is not prescribed, but on the assumption that psychiatrists have a higher level of training and experience. We are aware that nutrition, physical health, and a thorough understanding of comorbid physical diagnoses and neurological health are usually outside our scope of practice.

    // rant off.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.