<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>1 Boring Old Man</title>
	<link>http://1boringoldman.com</link>
	<description>All Mickey, All the Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 04:08:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.0.5" -->

	<item>
		<title>a natural&#8230;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[What Is the &#8220;Bible of Psychiatry&#8221; Supposed to Do? The Peculiar Challenges of an Uncertain Science Discover Magazine by Vaughn Bell May 22nd, 2012 The American Psychiatric Association have just published the latest update of the draft DSM-5 psychiatric diagnosis manual, which is due to be completed in 2013. The changes have provoked much comment, [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://1boringoldman.com/index.php/2012/05/24/a-natural/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>an editorial&#8230;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Re-reading my last post, I think I got entangled in the facts, the front page story, and didn&#8217;t fully make it to the editorial page. Here&#8217;s the editorial&#8230; From it&#8217;s earliest days, our DSM-5 Task Force set out to make a change. They were going to realize the dream of the St. Louis fathers of [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://1boringoldman.com/index.php/2012/05/23/an-editorial/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>to take us seriously&#8230;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, the APA has come and gone with its DSM-5 Track. Frankly, after the report of the results of the Field Trials, I didn&#8217;t pay very much attention to their report on the various changes in the Disorders. The Field Trials themselves were so devastating that everything else seemed immaterial. In the absence of the [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://1boringoldman.com/index.php/2012/05/22/to-take-us-seriously/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>speechless&#8230;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Sanctioned Psychiatrist Gets First NIH Grant in 3 Years Science by Jocelyn Kaiser 22 May 2012 A psychiatrist whose failure to disclose drug company income contributed to a furor over conflicts of interest in biomedical research has just received his first National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant in 3 years. Charles Nemeroff&#8217;s lax reporting of [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://1boringoldman.com/index.php/2012/05/22/speechless-2/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>what price, reliability?&#8230;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[An Aside: I&#8217;m starting this with a bias. In 2012, I think the diagnosis Major Depressive Disorder used in the 1980 DSM-III and since has been a maelstrom &#8211; an egregious error with multiple negative consequences. So my looking back on its roots is not just a casual jaunt into history. It&#8217;s more in the [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://1boringoldman.com/index.php/2012/05/21/23487/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>don&#8217;t seem to know&#8230;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Following the New York Times article [New Guidelines May Sharply Increase Addiction Diagnoses] about the DSM-5 Changes in the Addiction Diagnostic category [quoting people from both sides of the issue], Dr. Kupfer, chairman of the D.S.M.-5 Task Force, responded with a letter to the editor: It is an unsubstantiated claim that the proposed changes to [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://1boringoldman.com/index.php/2012/05/21/dont-seem-to-know/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>(sleight of hand)2&#8230;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I had sworn off vetting any clinical trials or meta-analyses for a while, but sometimes something special comes along. Neuroskeptic has already had his way with this one, but it had some features that seemed worthy of note. It&#8217;s a failed study [and how were they going to write JNJ-18038683 on a pill anyway?]: Translational [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://1boringoldman.com/index.php/2012/05/18/sleight-of-hand/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>the dreams of our fathers X&#8230;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Mental Illness &#8212; Comprehensive Evaluation or Checklist? by Paul R. McHugh, M.D., and Phillip R. Slavney, M.D. New England Journal of Medicine 2012 366:1853-1855. The debate over revising the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders is of more than intramural interest, for the way in which the promised fifth edition (DSM-5) resolves the debate [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://1boringoldman.com/index.php/2012/05/18/the-dreams-of-our-fathers-x/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>the dreams of our fathers IX…</title>
		<description><![CDATA[There are some paradoxes in the DSM-III: expunged of psychology, but adopted by the psychologists and other non-medical mental health specialties; etiology neutral but fostering a flowering of biology and neuroscience; called the Bible of Psychiatry but functioning more as the Bible of Industry &#8211; pharmaceutical, hospital corporations, and medical insurers; written for clinician use [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://1boringoldman.com/index.php/2012/05/17/the-dreams-of-our-fathers-ix%e2%80%a6/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>the dreams of our fathers VIII&#8230;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;ll begin winding up this journey by starting over. The Psychiatric Department ay Washington University in St. Louis in the 1960s stood as the center of Bological Psychiatry in America. They thought psychoanalysis, a dominant paradigm at the time, had no place in psychiatry either as theoretical base or as political force in organized [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://1boringoldman.com/index.php/2012/05/17/the-dreams-of-our-fathers-viii/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

