naked as a jaybird…

Posted on Tuesday 11 September 2007


From Dan Froomkin:

New York Times book critic Michiko Kakutani reviews Jack Goldsmith’s new book, "The Terror Presidency."

"The portrait of the Bush administration that Mr. Goldsmith — who resigned from the Office of Legal Counsel in June 2004, only nine months after assuming the post — draws in this book is a devastating one. It is a portrait of a highly insular White House obsessively focused on expanding presidential power and loathe to consult with Congress, a White House that frequently made up its mind about a course of action before consulting with experts, a White House that sidelined Congress in its policymaking and willfully pursued a ‘go-it-alone approach’ based on ‘minimal deliberation, unilateral action, and legalistic defense.’

"Similar portraits, of course, have been drawn by reporters and other former administration insiders, but Mr. Goldsmith’s account stands out by virtue that he was privy to internal White House debates about explosive matters like secret surveillance, coercive interrogation and the detention and trial of enemy combatants. It is also distinguished by Mr. Goldsmith’s writing from the point of view of a conservative who shared many of the Bush White House’s objectives. . . . But he found himself alarmed by the Bush White House’s obsession with expanding presidential power, its arrogant unilateralism and its willingness to use what he regarded as careless and overly expansive legal arguments in an effort to buttress its policies."

In an excerpt from his book on Slate, Goldsmith writes: "Why did the administration so often assert presidential power in ways that seemed unnecessary and politically self-defeating? The answer, I believe, is that the administration’s conception of presidential power had a kind of theological significance that often trumped political consequences…"

After watching as much of General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker as I could tolerate for the last two days, particularly on September 11th, I find myself seething, smoldering, kind of depressed. I didn’t expect them to convince me that the Surge "worked." I’ve so opposed this war from the start that such a change of heart would have been impossible without a brain transplant. But all of their charts and reviews of the war got me in touch with what an absolute disaster this whole endeavor has been – from the start. The invasion of Iraq was just one of the ways this Administration failed us. The story from Jack Goldsmith documents many others. The United States has ebbed and flowed over the years as a Constitutional Democracy should – swung left, swung right, hawked, doved, soared, and floundered. But we’ve never had a government like this one – never. David Petraeus and Ryan Crocker are on their team, decent men, but they are sitting in Congress taking the hits for a President and Vice President that are themselves our biggest problem – now and for the immediate future.

"But the Bush administration’s strategy is guaranteed not to work, and is certain to destroy trust altogether. When an administration makes little attempt to work with the other institutions of our government and makes it a public priority to emphasize that its aim is to expand its power, Congress, the courts, and the public listen carefully, and worry."
I watched these hearings hoping that the Congressional attendees would at least see that the Surge was simply another smoke and mirrors game from Bush and Cheney. But now I have higher hopes. I hope lots of people watched and felt as angry and depressed as I about the years of what Jack Golsmith is talking about – years of tragic abuses of power and craziness. And I hope that when the Emperor speaks Thursday, lots of people watch and realize that he’s naked as a jaybird…

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.