well said…

Posted on Saturday 6 December 2008


The Real Bill Ayers
By WILLIAM AYERS
December 5, 2008

In the recently concluded presidential race, I was unwillingly thrust upon the stage and asked to play a role in a profoundly dishonest drama. I refused, and here’s why. Unable to challenge the content of Barack Obama’s campaign, his opponents invented a narrative about a young politician who emerged from nowhere, a man of charm, intelligence and skill, but with an exotic background and a strange name. The refrain was a question: “What do we really know about this man?”

Secondary characters in the narrative included an African-American preacher with a fiery style, a Palestinian scholar and an “unrepentant domestic terrorist.” Linking the candidate with these supposedly shadowy characters, and ferreting out every imagined secret tie and dark affiliation, became big news. I was cast in the “unrepentant terrorist” role; I felt at times like the enemy projected onto a large screen in the “Two Minutes Hate” scene from George Orwell’s “1984,” when the faithful gathered in a frenzy of fear and loathing…

…Here are the facts:

I never killed or injured anyone. I did join the civil rights movement in the mid-1960s, and later resisted the draft and was arrested in nonviolent demonstrations. I became a full-time antiwar organizer for Students for a Democratic Society. In 1970, I co-founded the Weather Underground, an organization that was created after an accidental explosion that claimed the lives of three of our comrades in Greenwich Village. The Weather Underground went on to take responsibility for placing several small bombs in empty offices — the ones at the Pentagon and the United States Capitol were the most notorious — as an illegal and unpopular war consumed the nation.

The Weather Underground crossed lines of legality, of propriety and perhaps even of common sense. Our effectiveness can be — and still is being — debated. We did carry out symbolic acts of extreme vandalism directed at monuments to war and racism, and the attacks on property, never on people, were meant to respect human life and convey outrage and determination to end the Vietnam war. Peaceful protests had failed to stop the war. So we issued a screaming response. But it was not terrorism; we were not engaged in a campaign to kill and injure people indiscriminately, spreading fear and suffering for political ends.

I cannot imagine engaging in actions of that kind today. And for the past 40 years, I’ve been teaching and writing about the unique value and potential of every human life, and the need to realize that potential through education. I have regrets, of course — including mistakes of excess and failures of imagination, posturing and posing, inflated and heated rhetoric, blind sectarianism and a lot else. No one can reach my age with their eyes even partly open and not have hundreds of regrets. The responsibility for the risks we posed to others in some of our most extreme actions in those underground years never leaves my thoughts for long.

The antiwar movement in all its commitment, all its sacrifice and determination, could not stop the violence unleashed against Vietnam. And therein lies cause for real regret. We — the broad “we” — wrote letters, marched, talked to young men at induction centers, surrounded the Pentagon and lay down in front of troop trains. Yet we were inadequate to end the killing of three million Vietnamese and almost 60,000 Americans during a 10-year war.

The dishonesty of the narrative about Mr. Obama during the campaign went a step further with its assumption that if you can place two people in the same room at the same time, or if you can show that they held a conversation, shared a cup of coffee, took the bus downtown together or had any of a thousand other associations, then you have demonstrated that they share ideas, policies, outlook, influences and, especially, responsibility for each other’s behavior. There is a long and sad history of guilt by association in our political culture, and at crucial times we’ve been unable to rise above it.

President-elect Obama and I sat on a board together; we lived in the same diverse and yet close-knit community; we sometimes passed in the bookstore. We didn’t pal around, and I had nothing to do with his positions. I knew him as well as thousands of others did, and like millions of others, I wish I knew him better. Demonization, guilt by association, and the politics of fear did not triumph, not this time. Let’s hope they never will again. And let’s hope we might now assert that in our wildly diverse society, talking and listening to the widest range of people is not a sin, but a virtue.
I wondered if he’d respond. I’m glad he did. But I think that he’s a bit too apologetic, at least for some of us. What the Weather Underground did was much more in the mainstream of a lot of our thoughts back then. Our daughter’s dolls were named for Ayres wife [Bernadine Dohrn] and Angela Davis. In another time or another place, what they did might go down as heroic. As things went back then, they were ineffective, and actually contributed to the Conservative backlash we’ve lived with for the last several decades. But in the period when the Weather Underground was active, our frustration at being lied to, at being ignored, was at a fever pitch.

Ayres responds eloquently to the tactic of "guilt by association" that was so prominent in this last election. I have little to add to what he said. But there is something that needs to be added. Dick Cheney was a rising star in the Nixon Era, assistant to Donald Rumsfeld assigned to undermine the Prosecutions for racial discrimination. Their job then was to keep an Agency from functioning. George W. Bush was the pal and protege` of Lee Atwater, as was Karl Rove. Lee Atwater was the father of "Dirty Tricks." John McCain was pals with Charles Keating and his ally in keeping the Savings and Loan debacle going past all good sense. The associations and actions of the Republicans are off limits, while any possible "guilt by association" ploy is fair game going in the other direction.

And they’ve succeeded in demonizing not just the Weather Underground. They’ve disenfranchised to whole anti-war movement of the late sixties and early seventies. The "DFH" metaphor has become a watchword in Republican Campaigning. From my point of view, I think that anti-War Movement was the height of patriotism. It was all we could do to honor our friends that died in the Viet Nam War. I have felt ashamed that we couldn’t mount a similar effort about Iraq. I think the reasons it didn’t happen are complex, but the War is no less wrong, just less costly in lives.

I’m pleased to see that William Ayers has found a life for himself and his family afterwards. But I continue to grieve that so many of our generation had no life to find because of their unnecessary sacrifice in Southeast Asia.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.