not enough pain? or votes? or guts?

Posted on Monday 9 February 2009


The Destructive Center
By PAUL KRUGMAN
February 8, 2009

What do you call someone who eliminates hundreds of thousands of American jobs, deprives millions of adequate health care and nutrition, undermines schools, but offers a $15,000 bonus to affluent people who flip their houses? A proud centrist. For that is what the senators who ended up calling the tune on the stimulus bill just accomplished.

Even if the original Obama plan — around $800 billion in stimulus, with a substantial fraction of that total given over to ineffective tax cuts — had been enacted, it wouldn’t have been enough to fill the looming hole in the U.S. economy, which the Congressional Budget Office estimates will amount to $2.9 trillion over the next three years. Yet the centrists did their best to make the plan weaker and worse.

One of the best features of the original plan was aid to cash-strapped state governments, which would have provided a quick boost to the economy while preserving essential services. But the centrists insisted on a $40 billion cut in that spending. The original plan also included badly needed spending on school construction; $16 billion of that spending was cut. It included aid to the unemployed, especially help in maintaining health care — cut. Food stamps — cut. All in all, more than $80 billion was cut from the plan, with the great bulk of those cuts falling on precisely the measures that would do the most to reduce the depth and pain of this slump…

And Mr. Obama got nothing in return for his bipartisan outreach. Not one Republican voted for the House version of the stimulus plan, which was, by the way, better focused than the original administration proposal. In the Senate, Republicans inveighed against “pork” — although the wasteful spending they claimed to have identified (much of it was fully justified) was a trivial share of the bill’s total. And they decried the bill’s cost — even as 36 out of 41 Republican senators voted to replace the Obama plan with $3 trillion, that’s right, $3 trillion in tax cuts over 10 years…

Now, House and Senate negotiators have to reconcile their versions of the stimulus, and it’s possible that the final bill will undo the centrists’ worst. And Mr. Obama may be able to come back for a second round. But this was his best chance to get decisive action, and it fell short. So has Mr. Obama learned from this experience? Early indications aren’t good. For rather than acknowledge the failure of his political strategy and the damage to his economic strategy, the president tried to put a postpartisan happy face on the whole thing. “Democrats and Republicans came together in the Senate and responded appropriately to the urgency this moment demands,” he declared on Saturday, and “the scale and scope of this plan is right.” No, they didn’t, and no, it isn’t.
Well. this is the first time Paul Krugman has found anything right about the "original" Obama Plan. Instead of fighting for the Bill himself, he’s whined that the Bill was not enough, that Obama didn’t do it right, that the Republican hack job is Obama’s fault. It’s hard for me to not do to Krugman what Krugman is doing to Obama. It’s difficult for me not to point out how Krugman’s negativity is destructive. I keep trying to think that Krugman thinks that if he hammers hard enough, he can get Obama to do what he wants him to do. But what I actually think is that his hammer is awry. Krugman could make his economic point and go after at the forces that oppose the Stimulus altogether, instead of criticizing the President. But that’s not what he’s going to do, so I guess I’ll just give up. Krugman wants Obama to abandon his "bipartisan outreach." So do the Republicans. They want to kibitz and tear down "Hope" and "Yes we can" and replace it with their traditional divisive harangues. Krugman wants Obama to go along with continuing the divisive way of being a country.

Krugman does have a legitimate excuse. He sees what’s up ahead and knows where this thing is going. But maybe we aren’t hurting enough yet to do what’s needed. The Republicans are acting as if things just aren’t that bad and that Obama is some kind of socialist or social engineer who is trying to help the dregs of society – that the Stimulus Bill is a trick of some kind. And Krugman believes that Obama could’ve applied some kind of forceful rhetoric that would have cooled their heels. What actually happened was that all these compromises were made to get the votes – and the bloc voting Republicans had a Campaign to get what they wanted. So maybe there’s not enough of the pain Krugman sees coming to get the kind of sweeping Stimulus Package that might head some of it off. Krugman is seeing Obama as gutless, when the truth is that he’s shy the votes [see below] and the country hasn’t yet felt enough pain.

When I look at how much pain it took to get BushCo out of the White House, I suspect it’s going to take another kind of pain to get our government pointed in the right direction. And when I think of where we’d be right now had McCain and Palin been in the White House, I shudder. We’re apparently going to have to just have some of our 2nd Great Depression after all. The idea that we can prevent it may be bigger than our electorate and Congress can handle just now. Krugman sees where the economy is headed, but his finger isn’t on the pulse of America that elected Bush twice, tolerated the worst government in our history, and elected all these short-sighted Republican Senators that are making such a bloody mess of things. At least he and I agree that they’re making a bigger mess of our already big mess. F.D.R. came into the Presidency after three years of suffering and a 73rd Congress that looked like this:

Senate:

  Democratic Republican Farmer-Labor Total Vacant

Begin (1933-03-04) 59 36 1 96 0
1933-03-11 35 95 1
1933-05-24 60 96 0
1933-06-24 59 95 1
1933-10-06 34 94 2
1933-10-19 35 95 1
1933-11-03 58 94 2
1933-11-06 59 95 1
1934-01-01 60 96 0
1934-11-07

Voting Share 62% – 63% 36% 1%    

House of Representatives:

  Democratic Republican Farmer-Labor Total Vacant

Begin (1933-03-04) 311 117 5 433 2
1933-04-22 312 434 1
1933-04-29 311 433 2
1933-05-12 310 432 3
1933-05-17 309 431 4
1933-06-19 308 430 5
1933-06-22 307 429 6
1933-06-24 308 430 5
1933-07-05 309 431 4
1933-08-27 116 430 5
1933-09-23 308 429 6
1933-10-03 309 430 5
1933-10-19 115 429 6
1933-11-05 114 428 7
1933-11-07 310 429 6
1933-11-14 311 430 5
1933-11-28 312 431 4
1933-12-19 313 432 3
1933-12-19 113 431 4
1933-12-28 114 432 3
1934-01-16 115 433 2
1934-01-30 116 434 1
1934-04-01 312 433 2
1934-05-01 313 434 1
1934-05-29 115 433 2
1934-06-08 312 432 3
1934-07-07 313 433 2
1934-08-19 312 432 3
1934-09-30 114 431 4

Latest voting share 72% 27% 1%    

Unfortunately, this is Obama’s 111th Congress:

Senate:

  Democratic Independent
Republican Total Vacant

Begin 55 2 41 98 2
January 15, 2009 56 99 1
January 20, 2009 55 98 2
January 26, 2009 56 99 1

Votes [Independents] 58% – 59%
41% – 42%
 
Votes [no Independents] 56% – 57%
2%
41% – 42%
 

House of Representatives:

  Democratic Independent Republican Total Vacant

Begin 256 0 178 434 1
Current 255 0 178 433 2

Latest voting share 59% 0% 41%  
  1.  
    diane
    February 9, 2009 | 9:04 PM
     

    Mickey, has anyone ever told you that your a blog is just a wee bit depressing?

    Seriously, I never thought on my way to the all the trouble and expense of getting a Ph. D that I would someday be seriously concerned about making ends meet financially after I finally succeeded. Some of our family’s financial woes are from my husband being out of work for a year and a half during the Bush years, but many more are from the ridiculous health care costs our family has even with health care coverage that costs us an enormous amount each month. The co-pays and out of pocket expenses that we have to meet are utterly ridiculous.

    Reading your blog makes me feel as if little relief will soon be available, but then to be honest I feel the same way after reading the news. So, keep making your voice heard and saying what you think and feel. Maybe some intelligent folks will listen.

    Btw, I read a quote this week that made me think of you and made my husband think of you when I read it to him. It was from a “New Yorker” eulogy of John Updike in which the writer comments that the purpose and the point of any piece of literature are two different things and that Updike made that clear in a critical essay. The comment was that Updike made it clear that the purpose of “King Lear” was to purge the soul with pity and terror, but the point of “King Lear” was “that old men should not retire prematurely.”

    I’m not saying you retired prematurely. I’m only saying the comment made both of us think of you. I wish the world had more of your ilk practicing and influencing others.

    warm regards,

    diane

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.