Dick Cheney on Meet the Press
Now, is there a connection between the Iraqi government and the original World Trade Center bombing in ’93? We know, as I say, that one of the perpetrators of that act did, in fact, receive support from the Iraqi government after the fact. With respect to 9/11, of course, we’ve had the story that’s been public out there. The Czechs alleged that Mohamed Atta, the lead attacker, met in Prague with a senior Iraqi intelligence official five months before the attack, but we’ve never been able to develop anymore of that yet either in terms of confirming it or discrediting it. We just don’t know.
| September 13, 2006
The Honorable William H. Frist Dear Leader Frist: Late last week the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on a bipartisan basis released reports that discussed Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program and its links to terrorism and the intelligence community’s use of information provided by the Iraqi National Congress. These reports provided the American people with important insights into these critical issues.
Unfortunately, the Administration chose to classify certain important portions of these reports that should have been released to the public. A bipartisan majority of the Intelligence Committee disagreed with the Administration’s decision to classify certain portions of the report’s findings and conclusions and said that classifying this information is
“without justification.” In my view, the Administration’s decision to classify one particular portion of the report – a section discussing a CIA document about the alleged meeting in Prague between 9/11 hijacker Mohammed Atta and an Iraqi intelligence officer – is especially troubling and lacking in justification.
As you may know, as recently as this Sunday on national television, Vice President Cheney left open the possibility that such a meeting may have occurred. However, a bipartisan majority of the Intelligence Committee, after thoroughly reviewing relevant intelligence reports and assessments, concluded “no such meeting occurred.” The continued classification of sections referencing this meeting only serves to prevent the American public from knowing the full facts about this matter.
The classified version of the Intelligence Committee’s report, including the sections dealing with the alleged Atta meeting, are available for all Senators to review in the Committee’s offices in room SH-211. I urge you to join with me to encourage all members to review this text so they understand its importance and why that text can and should be made available to the American people.
In light of the importance of this issue, I also think it is important that the Senate act to declassify those portions of the text on pages 96, 97, and 98 of the Intelligence Committee’s report that are currently redacted but do not involve sources and methods.
I plan to offer an amendment on that subject to the legislation currently pending in the Senate. Notwithstanding the procedural situation on the floor, I hope you will join with me to offer this important amendment, permit the Senate to act on it, and support its swift adoption.
While I understand that S. Res. 400 spells out a process for the Senate to declassify information, that process is a lengthy one that is likely to take us well beyond your announced adjournment date for the U.S. Senate.
Therefore, in light of the importance of this issue, I think it is appropriate that the Senate act expeditiously to declassify this material.
Sincerely, Harry Reid see Senator Reid calls on White House to stop cover-up of Cheney’s Iraq lies |
|
Dear Mr. Vice President: On Sunday’s "Meet the Press," you stated "we don’t know" whether September 11 hijacker Mohammed Atta ever met with an Iraqi intelligence officer in Prague. Just last Friday, the Senate Intelligence Committee released a report that cites multiple declassified intelligence assessments, some from as early as mid-2002, reporting evidence that the meeting did not occur. In addition, the 9/11 Commission concluded that "[t]he available evidence does not support the original Czech report" of a meeting between Mohammed Atta and an Iraqi officer. There are also classified assessments on this topic from the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Central Intelligence Agency, dated 20 March 2006 and 27 April 2006, respectively. The evidence is now public and the facts undisputed that the Prague meeting never happened. There was no provable link between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda prior to 9/11. I urge you to correct your statement on "Meet the Press" and to be accurate in any future remarks. Senator Jane Harman |
I can think of no reason to classify this portion of the report except that it is about the only 911, al Qaeda, Iraq link that hasn’t been already thoroughly and completely debunked [and that it’s the one that Cheney used last Sunday on Meet the Press]. I sure can’t think of any legitimate reason to classify the committee’s opinion on the matter. These days, the misuse of Executive power is so out of hand that it’s hard to even see any but their devious motives. Likewise, the mining of intelligence information for things that might vaguely confirm their activities is the rule of the day. "British Intelligence," Niger Forgeries, Aluminum tubes, "Czechs alleged," etc.
What utter nonsense…
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.