six good months…

Posted on Tuesday 17 January 2006

Six months ago today, we got our first look at Matt Cooper’s article in Time Magazine about his Grand Jury testimony, naming Karl Rove as his source in the outing of Valerie Plame. While Bush and Rove are still in the White House, it’s been a rather fine six months for the cause of – well, you know which cause.

We now know that the Iraq war was trumped up by the Administration, that the Downing Street Memo is true. We now know that the White House outed Plame to discredit her husband for daring to question the Administration’s integrity. We now know that former New York Times reporter, Judith Miller, was a willing conduit for the White House W.H.I.G. campaign to make the P.N.A.C. dream of war into a reality. We now know that the President of the United States is a law-breaker who ignores Congress and spies on American citizens. We now know that there has been a level of corruption unequalled in our history in the current Republican Congress. And we know that those are just a few highlights of the kind of insanity that has gripped us for the last five years.

What we don’t know, is how to end it. Harry Reid and John Murtha, two unlikely candidates for Sir Galahad have started the ball rolling, but it hasn’t rolled very far yet. Yesterday, Al Gore gave the speech of his life. It was clear and systematic. He proved his case that our Administration is making an assault on our country and its form of government unlike any other. After that speech, the Administration is going to have to argue their case for changing our government and our Constitution directly, rather than sliding those changes in disguised as something else.

So, where are we now? We are at a place where we can directly challenge what this Administration has done in the courts, in congressional hearings, in the media, and on the streets. But that battle has only begun, seems to me. I’m not too worried that it will continue to proceed. There’s a pretty good momentum. What worries me is that who "we" are is without a definition. While most of us are people who might be called Democrats, or Liberals, we are not generally people who are part of the heirarchy of either establishment.

Yesterday’s speech by Al Gore sounded to me like "the best of bloglines.com" [or at least the sites I follow]. As he spoke, I could hear the DailyKOS, the Left Coaster, the Washington Note, Crooks and Liars, some muted Atrios and Firedoglake, and lots of others. It was a bit like suddenly it wasn’t the Huffington Post following the news, it was the news following the Huffington Post. He reads his blogs well.

Pretty soon, Rove and company is going to figure out where the real lever that’s monkeying with the works is located and define "we" as the enemy. Frankly, it sounds like fun, but I think the big sites that are part of "we" ought to think about how this next six months is going to go when that happens. It won’t be "swift boating" exactly, it will be "Michael Moore-ing" – caricaturing the blogs as something contemptible like Rove did with Move On or they all did with Cindy Sheehan.

 

  1.  
    Abby's mom
    January 17, 2006 | 10:46 AM
     

    It’s no surprise that Al Gore would sound as if he had been reading blogs. After all, we know that regardless of the jokes, he was a pioneer in internetting. He may even be reading this blog. It’s written by an astute thinker!

  2.  
    friendly joe
    January 17, 2006 | 10:48 AM
     

    As I suppose he should read them well. He was instrumental in bringing into fruition the idea of an Internet back there in the dark ages after all. He was good, wasn’t he? How did he change so much in six short years?

  3.  
    January 17, 2006 | 12:57 PM
     

    I’m not sure it’s at the point where it can be ended yet. My hunch is that America has not yet ended her lurch to the right.

    And a small niggle – contemptible not contemptuous.

  4.  
    January 17, 2006 | 3:47 PM
     

    Lord Mark, how much further is there to lurch?
    Thanks for the spelling tip, and the link to Alan’s widow…

  5.  
    Karen
    January 17, 2006 | 6:50 PM
     

    Well, just posted about the two cases challenging the NSA spying – they are only for injunctive relief to STOP these from continuing – but this can get the legal ball-rolling as to the determination of the legality and the administrations violations on that score.

    But depressing how the supposed *liberal* MSM media refused to cover the Gore speech in any meaninful fashion …. but gave loads of lip service to its detractors.

    I hope that the legalities will begin to resound and act to recover the American Legal rights being trampled here… whether some folks Like it or NOT.

    🙂

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.