Posted on Monday 26 June 2006


Bush, Cheney assail media over bank-data program

Despite the government’s efforts to keep the program quiet, The New York Times laid out the program in detail last week and other major U.S. newspapers also reported on it.

Bush said the financial-records monitoring was legal and an important tool for preventing terror attacks.

"Congress was briefed. And what we did was fully authorized under the law. And the disclosure of this program is disgraceful," Bush told reporters after a meeting with groups supporting the U.S. military in Iraq.

"What we were doing was the right thing. Congress was aware of it, and we were within the law to do so," he said. "If you want to figure out what the terrorists are doing, you try to follow their money. And that’s exactly what we’re doing."

The disclosure late last year of the warrantless eavesdropping program prompted lawmakers to raise privacy concerns and questions about whether the administration was overstepping its executive powers.

Some lawmakers have raised similar concerns about the bank-records program, but the criticism has been more muted.

Cheney, in remarks at a fundraiser in Nebraska, went further than Bush in lashing out at the news media — in particular the New York Times — over the revelations on both the financial monitoring and telephone eavesdropping programs.

"The New York Times has now twice — two separate occasions — disclosed programs; both times they had been asked not to publish those stories by senior administration officials," Cheney said. "They went ahead anyway."

Cheney expressed outrage that The New York Times had won a Pulitzer Prize for its reporting on the telephone surveillance program.

… 

Mr. Cheney speaks from a strange position. He talks as if he and his friends are beyond question, beyond oversight – and worse, he actually seems to believe what he says. He expects automatic respect. While no one in a Democracy gets automatic respect, these two are amazingly arrogant on this point. We have polls for such things – which they tout when they look good and dicount when they don’t [like now]. They seem to actually believe that if they say something, it ought to be accepted as some kind of infallable truth…

I’d suggest some media restraint too. Stop quoting Dick Cheney!

  1.  
    Smoooochie
    June 27, 2006 | 1:06 PM
     

    Bush doesn’t recognize the face of disgrace even when he’s looking in the mirror. But then I suppose that’s not what he wants to believe.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.