I recant…

Posted on Saturday 22 July 2006

I take back every bad thing I’ve ever said about lawyers. I apologize for laughing at lawyer jokes. If the A.B.A. can bring this off, I’m putting the Lawyer’s Benevolent Society at the top of my charity donations!

Bar association task force urges Congress to push for judicial review of Bush signing statements

Although the president has not issued more statements in total than any other president, he has challenged more than 750 laws in more than 100 signing statements. And he has used them to, in effect, challenge parts of laws, and challenge them more aggressively, than any president before him. Bush’s liberal use of those statements first attracted attention in December 2005, when he signed a torture ban—but then added a statement reserving the right not to enforce the ban, alongside his signature. Since then, Congress has held a hearing to investigate Bush’s use of the statements, a bipartisan advocacy group has condemned their use, and Democratic Rep. Barney Frank has introduced a bill that would allow Congress to override content in them that contradicts signed legislation.

Now, U.S. News has learned, an American Bar Association task force is set to suggest even stronger action. In a report to be released Monday, the task force will recommend that Congress pass legislation providing for some sort of judicial review of the signing statements. Some task force members want to simply give Congress the right to sue over the signing statements; other task force members will not characterize what sort of judicial review might ultimately emerge.

To mount a legal case, a person or group must have been granted "standing," or the right to file a lawsuit. Current law does not grant members of Congress such a right, and recent Supreme Court decisions have denied it in all but very exceptional cases. But Congress could consider bypassing that hurdle by writing a law to give its members the right to sue, a resolution in the task force’s report declares, a source familiar with the task force report told U.S. News.

The resolution cannot become official ABA policy without approval from the group’s legislative body, scheduled to meet in Hawaii next month. The resolution cannot become official aba policy without approval from the group’s legislative body, scheduled to meet in Hawaii next month.

And:

ABA Blasts the Specter NSA Bill-Calls for Congress to Wake Up!

  1.  
    dc
    July 23, 2006 | 1:29 AM
     

    I’d have commented ‘lower’, but the time stamp on this (excellent) post seemed to mark this spot, as appropriate.

    New questions over death of David Kelly
    [Excerpt]
    Writing exclusively in The Mail on Sunday, Mr Baker insists it is time to question the findings of the Hutton report. He says: “I challenge the conclusion on the basis that the medical evidence cannot support it, that Dr Kelly’s own behaviour and character argues strongly against it and that there were grave shortcomings in the legal and investigative processes set up to consider his death.”
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=397129

  2.  
    July 23, 2006 | 10:29 PM
     

    dc

    Thanks for keeping up with the Kelly story. Mr. Baker is fighting an uphill battle, but he’s dogging his way through. Sooner or later, the truth has to be out in this story. The “Dark Actors” are still unexplained…

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.