I remember sitting with Richard Perle in his suite at London’s Grosvenor House hotel and receiving a private lecture on the importance of securing victory in Iraq. "Iraq is a very good candidate for democratic reform," he said. "It won’t be Westminster overnight, but the great democracies of the world didn’t achieve the full, rich structure of democratic governance overnight. The Iraqis have a decent chance of succeeding." Perle seemed to exude the scent of liberation, as well as a whiff of gunpowder. It was February 2003, and Operation Iraqi Freedom, the culmination of his long campaign on behalf of regime change in Iraq, was less than a month away.
Three years later, Perle and I meet again at his home outside Washington, D.C. It is October, the worst month for U.S. casualties in Iraq in almost two years, and Republicans are bracing for losses in the upcoming midterm elections. As he looks into my eyes, speaking slowly and with obvious deliberation, Perle is unrecognizable as the confident hawk who, as chairman of the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee, had invited the exiled Iraqi dissident Ahmad Chalabi to its first meeting after 9/11. "The levels of brutality that we’ve seen are truly horrifying, and I have to say, I underestimated the depravity," Perle says now, adding that total defeat—an American withdrawal that leaves Iraq as an anarchic "failed state"—is not yet inevitable but is becoming more likely. "And then," says Perle, "you’ll get all the mayhem that the world is capable of creating."
According to Perle, who left the Defense Policy Board in 2004, this unfolding catastrophe has a central cause: devastating dysfunction within the administration of President George W. Bush. Perle says, "The decisions did not get made that should have been. They didn’t get made in a timely fashion, and the differences were argued out endlessly.… At the end of the day, you have to hold the president responsible.… I don’t think he realized the extent of the opposition within his own administration, and the disloyalty."
Perle goes so far as to say that, if he had his time over, he would not have advocated an invasion of Iraq: "I think if I had been delphic, and had seen where we are today, and people had said, ‘Should we go into Iraq?,’ I think now I probably would have said, ‘No, let’s consider other strategies for dealing with the thing that concerns us most, which is Saddam supplying weapons of mass destruction to terrorists.’ … I don’t say that because I no longer believe that Saddam had the capability to produce weapons of mass destruction, or that he was not in contact with terrorists. I believe those two premises were both correct. Could we have managed that threat by means other than a direct military intervention? Well, maybe we could have."
Perle is right on one score – George W. Bush has been a horrible wartime President. No matter how many times he’s told us that he’s the "decider" or that he’s the "Commander in Chief," neither he nor anyone else in the White House has the slightest clue how to conduct a war. It’s as if a band director were appointed to be the high school football coach, and sent his team in doing nothing more than yelling from the sidelines, "Go Team!" [he was, after all, a cheerleader at Yale]. To me, it is infuriating that he is running "on the war." Whether one supports the war or not, he and his neocon backers should be run out of town on a rail for their incompetent conduct of the war itsef…
You don’t mess with a good recipe, and I think that’s just what the neocons have done. Political theory is a fantastic subject and is necessary to help the country grow with the various changes in society, technology, etc. However, when you take out the main ingredients of democracy and try and replace them with unfounded theory it’s a bad mix.
I think it shows bad form on the NeoCons part to try and side step the blame for the fiasco that the war is when it was their theory that put us there. Granted Bush has his part to play, but his administration is based on their theories and ideologies. I’m glad Bush is losing support even among his “own” but I hope they don’t have enough power to just replace him with some other incompetent “Decider.”