rightness…

Posted on Monday 25 June 2007


"The CIA guys said, ‘We’re going to have some real difficulties getting actionable intelligence from detainees’" if interrogators confined themselves to humane techniques allowed by the Geneva Conventions.

… meaning These assholes ain’t gonna` talk `til we beat the shit out of them [a logic similar to These assholes ain’t gonna` leave us alone ’til we knock down their damn Towers]. We heard a lot of that kind of talk back then. Wanted, dead or alive. Bring it on. Why even bother to translate it into something like real difficulties getting actionable intelligence from detainees?

Dick Cheney and his band of whatever·neoconservatives·are had a belief – a belief many of us see as false. They believed that America won the ‘Cold War.’ Actually, they thought something more than that. They believed that Ronald Reagan [and something called Reaganism] won the ‘Cold War’ by standing tough against the Russians – outspending them on the Military. It’s part of Wolfowitz’s old Defense Guidance [1992], revived as the Bush Doctrine [2002] – Strength Beyond Challenge. Most of the rest of us thought the Iron Curtain, the Berlin Wall, World Communism, the Soviet Bloc all fell down because the U.S.S.R. was, at the core, a corrupt dictatorship – and falling down is what they do. We don’t question that The Arms Race and The Policy of Containment had something to do with what happened – but so did Rock and Roll and Conspicuous Consumerism. They envied what we had, and finally got around to getting it for themselves – it’s what people do.

Cheney et al had another belief, or at least they said they had another belief – American Democracy is the right kind of government for people to have. It was part of the Defense Guidance, the Bush Doctrine, and the Project for the New American Century:

Extending Democracy, Liberty, and Security to All Regions

  • A policy of actively promoting American versions of democracy and freedom in all regions of the world. Bush declared at West Point, "America has no empire to extend or utopia to establish. We wish for others only what we wish for ourselves — safety from violence, the rewards of liberty, and the hope for a better life."
This part is absolutely remarkable. They espouse Evangelical Americanism – safety, liberty, freedom, democracy – and do everything imaginable to undermine the very process they’re selling. How does that work? Cheney’s a master of political manipulation. This series in the Washington Post is hardly a story of a public servant executing the "will of the people." In fact, the story makes this point over and over:

"The only person in Washington who cares less about his public image than David Addington is Dick Cheney," said a former White House ally. "What both of them miss is that ….. in times of war, a prerequisite for success is people having confidence in their leadership. This is the great failure of the administration — a complete and total indifference to public opinion."

I disagree with former White House ally. I don’t think they’re indifferent to public opinion, I think they believe that what they think is right. They think the rest of us just don’t see their rightness. In psychoanalytic circles, we call it Narcissism after the Greek mythologic figure who fell in love with his own image. Only we use the term for people who fall in love with their own minds, their own thoughts. So I’d paraphrase former White House ally, "The only person in Washington who cares more about his own rightness than David Addington is Dick Cheney."

Dick Cheney and David Addington are the very kind of persons American versions of democracy and freedom were designed to prevent. The whole point of Democracy, of Checks and Balances, of Oversight is to block Narcissists like them from promulgating their own personal deified thoughts on the rest of us as right. What looks to former White House ally like indifference to public opinion is actually a pathological conviction that their own opinions are absolutely correct, independent of what others think of them. So they only hang around with people who mirror back their rightness, and discount the rest of us. They are only indifferent to public opinions that differ from their own. In fact, they don’t think of their ideas as opinions, they see them as facts.

"Once he’s taken a position, I think that’s it," said James A. Baker III, who has shared a hunting tent with Cheney more than once and worked with him under three presidents.
Bush Doctrine Scorecard
Principle Success Failure

Preemption
Unilateralism
Strength beyond challenge
A policy of actively promoting American versions of democracy and freedom in all regions of the world.

This story we’re reading in the Washigton Post is a story about a Narcissistic [and very talented] man who has the political skill to parlay his own opinions into public policy – and he’s done that for six long years. Narcissistic people don’t believe in Democracy, they manipulate it. They believe in power. It takes power to get the masses moving down the right paths.

How do you turn a Narcissistic person into a Paranoid person? It’s a piece of cake. Osama Bin Laden did it in a morning. You confront him with the wrongness of his thoughts.  In 2001, Dick Cheney was on top of his game. He wasn’t President, but he’d made it to the top. He could control the world from the background. Everyone knew Bush was a figurehead – everyone, even the people who voted for Bush that had good sense. Cheney had his Energy Conference – the big guys were in his corner. All that he needed was a reason to unseat Saddam Hussein, and he’d bring America the oil we needed to maintain our lifestyle and fill the coffers of the oil companies. He knew Iraq was his for the taking. He’d already done that once before. But 9/11 put a damper on all of that. So much for pre-emption. So much for unilaterality. So much for strength beyond challenge.

I expect Cheney really believed that Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11. In his mind, Hussein was the enemy. Bin Laden had to be being controlled and supported by Hussein. As Baker said, "Once he’s taken a position, I think that’s it." So, for five years, Cheney has spouted this delusion at any opportunity. He believed it. Paranoia’s like that – fixed false beliefs. The people he got to agree with him were in the Defense Department – Don Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith – the "likewise afflicted."

I would bet that what Cheney really wanted to get by torturing the prisoners is the same thing he wanted from the C.I.A. – confirmation the Iraq was behind everything. Hussein had pulled one on him, and he wasn’t going to let him get away with it. Cheney just knew he was right about that. Just like he just knew that Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. So he tortured the prisoners [just like he tortured the C.I.A.] to get confirmation of what he knew was true – of what he still believes…

Am I right about this? Who the hell knows. It’s just what I think… 

  1.  
    Smoooochie
    June 25, 2007 | 10:31 AM
     

    They talk about extending democracy, but all it takes is a simple look at the devastation they’ve created to our democracy and the wasteland of nothing that even remotely resembles democracy in Iraq you have to wonder. Power has corrupted absolutely in men who have only their own interests at heart. Democracy is not safe in such hands.

  2.  
    June 25, 2007 | 11:16 AM
     

    “Democracy is not safe in such hands.”
    nor is it Democracy…

  3.  
    joyhollywood
    June 25, 2007 | 9:18 PM
     

    I just watched Countdown on MSNBC with Keith Olbermann tonight where he had pictures of Bush with the 50 Best and the Brightest kids in the country( 1 kid from every state was picked) they had a photo with Bush at the White House. The kids wrote a letter to Bush asking him to stop the torturing of people and to honor the Geneva Convention. Bush told them that the United States doesn’t torture people. Keith read the letter and then he applauded them on the air. It was a great moment. He called the kids his heroes and I do too. I thought we needed a good story about our country.

  4.  
    Abby's mom
    June 26, 2007 | 4:58 AM
     

    That also made it to ABC news (or was it NBC). I watched both last night.

  5.  
    Abby's mom
    June 26, 2007 | 5:35 AM
     

    In excerpts from the second installment of the series:

    “The new Army field manual… said that interrogators were forbidden to employ a long list of techniques that had been used against suspected terrorists since Sept. 11, 2001 — including stripping, hooding, inflicting pain and forcing the performance of sex acts.

    Australian …David Hicks… was beginning his sixth year at the U.S. naval prison at Guantanamo Bay. …according to an affidavit…, Hicks was subjected to beatings, sodomy with a foreign object, sensory deprivation, disorienting drugs and prolonged shackling in painful positions.”

    We’ve been doing these things since 9/11? No wonder America and Americans are so hated. Our leaders are disgraceful barbarians without conscience.

  6.  
    joyhollywood
    June 27, 2007 | 6:42 AM
     

    I believe that the people who are responsible for our methods of treatment to prisoners and say that we don’t torture should receive a sample of those methods we use, just to show the world that it’s not torture don’ t you?

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.