Bush thinks?

Posted on Saturday 1 September 2007

 
 

The Pentagon has drawn up plans for massive airstrikes against 1,200 targets in Iran, designed to annihilate the Iranians’ military capability in three days, according to a national security expert.

Alexis Debat, director of terrorism and national security at the Nixon Center, said last week that US military planners were not preparing for “pinprick strikes” against Iran’s nuclear facilities. “They’re about taking out the entire Iranian military,” he said.

Debat was speaking at a meeting organised by The National Interest, a conservative foreign policy journal. He told The Sunday Times that the US military had concluded: “Whether you go for pinprick strikes or all-out military action, the reaction from the Iranians will be the same.” It was, he added, a “very legitimate strategic calculus”.

President George Bush intensified the rhetoric against Iran last week, accusing Tehran of putting the Middle East “under the shadow of a nuclear holocaust”. He warned that the US and its allies would confront Iran “before it is too late”.

One Washington source said the “temperature was rising” inside the administration. Bush was “sending a message to a number of audiences”, he said � to the Iranians and to members of the United Nations security council who are trying to weaken a tough third resolution on sanctions against Iran for flouting a UN ban on uranium enrichment.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) last week reported “significant” cooperation with Iran over its nuclear programme and said that uranium enrichment had slowed. Tehran has promised to answer most questions from the agency by November, but Washington fears it is stalling to prevent further sanctions. Iran continues to maintain it is merely developing civilian nuclear power.

Bush is committed for now to the diplomatic route but thinks Iran is moving towards acquiring a nuclear weapon. According to one well placed source, Washington believes it would be prudent to use rapid, overwhelming force, should military action become necessary.

Israel, which has warned it will not allow Iran to acquire nuclear weapons, has made its own preparations for airstrikes and is said to be ready to attack if the Americans back down.
The operative words in this article are "Bush is committed for now to the diplomatic route but thinks Iran is moving towards acquiring a nuclear weapon."  First, who says Bush is "committed for now to the diplomatic route?" That’s certainly not apparent to me. But then we hear the concept "[Bush] thinks." Where is the evidence that Mr. Bush thinks. Finally, "… thinks Iran is moving towards acquiring a nuclear weapon" is all it takes for him. He believes that what he thinks is what is. Most people think something, then look for evidence that it is or is not a valid thought. As much as I enjoy the London Times, this Times article betrays how little they understand about Mr. Bush. He doesn’t "think." He is an action figure. He does things. Bombing the hell out of Iran has been an action he’s lusted after for six years. He’s running out of time, so he’s turning up the heat.

  1.  
    joyhollywood
    September 2, 2007 | 10:10 AM
     

    Check out Larry Johnson’s blog no quarter with Ray McGovern’s piece about Iran.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.