Throughout 2007, Frederick W. Kagan and AEI’s Iraq Planning Group have monitored the situation in Iraq. In January, Kagan released his phase I report, Choosing Victory: A Plan for Success in Iraq, which urged a rapid scale-up and military surge to clear and hold key points in Iraq. Phase II focused on establishing stability after the initial military component of the surge. Last week, in anticipation of the testimony of General David Petraeus, he presented a third installment. Kagan argues against "middle-way strategies" that falsely offer prospects for a significant troop drawdown with minimal costs; rather, No Middle Way counters that such "train and equip" strategies would compromise the progress that has been made, including improved security in Baghdad and Anbar, integration of former insurgents into civil police units, and the dispersal of al Qaeda. At the session, retired General Jack Keane described the "remarkable progress, some of it quite unforeseen" that he had observed in Iraq, and argued that now is not the time to embrace defeat.
Other speakers at the September 5 conference included Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Michael O’Hanlon of the Brookings Institution, and James Miller of the Center for a New American Security. Kagan recently analyzed the Government Accountability Office’s Iraq report and the report of the Jones Commission. He has written about policy conflicts over the surge. Thomas Donnelly and Gary J. Schmitt recently addressed the surge and military capabilities. Donnelly has also written about defeatism on the home front.
- We must reject legislating American surrender and defeat in Iraq and Afghanistan but we must also reject stay the course as an answer.
- We need a new course.
- We need an honest national dialogue and a determination to be candid about our opponents, honest about the problems, and passionately committed to the survival of America as a free country in which its citizens can be safe.
- We need to make changes today to have our 21st century national security structures ready for the challenges of the 21st century.
- We need a blueprint for reform and success. It is not acceptable that we have more impediments to action than enablers for action.
- We need a strategy—not a campaign—to rationalize ends and means to achieve our objectives in this long war against our way of life.
- The American people are fully capable of understanding the scale of the threat, the dangers to our lives, the threats to our very survival.
- The American people showed enormous patience through the great agony of the Civil War.
- The American people sustained the Cold War for 44 years until the Soviet Union disappeared.
- The problem is not with the American people.
- The problem is with our politicians, our news media and our bureaucratic elites.
- They are afraid to tell the American people the truth.
- They are afraid to explain the scale of the threat and the inevitable scale of the needed response…
These are the people who formulated Bush’s Policy back in the 9/11 days. They’d thinned their ranks back in 2001, as many of their scholars had headed for the White House to take over our government. But, in looking over their site, I ran across something of interest – an impromptu Press Conference on September 14, 2001 with the A.E.I. luminaries that hadn’t teleported to the White House – Laurie Mylroie, Jeanne Kirkpatrick, David Wurmser, Michael Ledeen, Newt Gingrich.
It is interesting to compare what they said then to what they’re saying now. These people are unswerving warriors. They are the force behind our disasterous foreign policy, the one that’s dug us in this very deep hole. But they want more…
President Bush is expected this week to announce his plans for cutting back U.S. troop numbers in Iraq, a senior administration official said Tuesday. Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in the country, told Congress this week he could see troop numbers sliding by 30,000 – which would reduce the number of troops to pre-surge levels – by July 2008. Administration officials did not specifically say the president would use the 30,000 figure – but one said he would "make clear there are challenges ahead in Iraq, but also enough progress" to reduce troop levels…
YOU. ARE. GOOD> Thanks, M.
you’ll like this take, too, I think. [carry on] : ) (from WRH)
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/II12Ak01.html
HAWKS CONTINUE HYPING IRAN ‘THREAT’
ANTI-IRAN HYPE REACHES FEVER PITCH
On the same day General David Petraeus presented his much-anticipated progress report to the US Congress on the US military’s “troop surge” strategy in Iraq, neo-conservative ideologues associated with the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) took aim at another of the reputed foes of “freedom” – the Islamic Republic of Iran.
“Everybody has convinced themselves that they can make a deal with Iran. We have been negotiating for 27 years, as if there have been no negotiations … there is no escape,” he said. “The only question is how best to defeat them.” “They want us to die. They want to destroy us,” said Ledeen. He went on to describe the Islamist sentiment in Iran as a “political death wish, a political necrophilia”.
Posted Sep 11, 2007 05:23 PM PST
Category: IRAN
Memo to Michael Ledeen: what is this nonsense about “negotiating”? For the last 27 years, the US hasn’t even had a functioning consulate in Iran.
If we’re speaking to Iran regarding anything, it’s generally through the Swiss consulate, which acts in our behalf regarding issues with Iran..
And would someone, please, show me any evidence of negotiations with Iran in that time period?
What have we done, except to be geopolitically bellicose, threatening, and invaded a neighboring country?
Not one heck of a lot.