the “surge” is working? it was worth it?

Posted on Thursday 27 March 2008


Militias Resist Iraqi Forces in Fight for Basra

The fighting in Basra with the Mahdi Army, the armed wing of the political movement led by the radical Shiite cleric Moktada al-Sadr, set off clashes in cities throughout Iraq and major demonstrations in Sadr City, the huge Baghdad neighborhood that is Mr. Sadr’s base of power, and other Shiite neighborhoods in the capital.

Although Mr. Bush praised the Iraqi government for leading the fighting, it also appeared that the Iraqi government was pursuing its own agenda, calling the battles a fight against “criminal” elements but seeking to marginalize the Mahdi Army. The Americans share the Iraqi government’s hostility toward what they call rogue elements of the Mahdi Army but will also be faced with the consequences if the battles erupt into more widespread unrest.

The violence underscored the fragile nature of the security improvements partly credited to the American troop increase that began last year. Officials have acknowledged that a cease-fire called by Mr. Sadr last August has contributed to the improvements. Should the cease-fire collapse entirely, those gains could be in serious jeopardy, making it far more difficult to begin bringing substantial numbers of American troops home…
Those people are demonstrating about something. I don’t think that they are out there welcoming us with open arms a liberators. I can’t read the signs, but I doubt they say "Your Surge is working! Thank you!". I don’t think they’re thinking of the hostilities in Basra as being run by "rogue elements" like Mr. Bush thinks. Nope, they look like they are in favor of something to me.
In Bush’s War [Part 2, Chapter 4] there’s a segment called Bremmer’s Next Edict: Dissolve the Iraqi Army ["And then there is the issue of taking on Moqtada al-Sadr"]. It’s talking about the coming of Paul Bremer and the appointment of General Sanchez [his first major military command] in the Spring of 2003. Apparently these two were mostly oil and water, but they did agree on one thing – Moqtada al-Sadr was one very dangerous cookie. Bremer wanted to take him on, and pushed Washington hard. Sanchez had the operation to fight al-Sadr ready to go. Rice and Rumsfeld just never got around to acting. They said it "worried" them.

So, the one thing the people on the ground agreed on [Bremer and Sanchez], going after al-Sadr [who had murdered an Ayatollah flown to Iraq during the first days of our occupation of Baghdad], was ignored by National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld for unspecified reasons.

It looks like one of their many who-knows-what-they-were-thinking mistakes. They shut down the Baathist Party. They dissolved the Iraqi Army. But they didn’t act against Moqtada al-Sadr. It’s five years later, and those people in the picture up there are demonstrating about something today. They’re demonstrating for Moqtada al-Sadr, the Shiite Cleric who is taking over Basra with his now huge Militia. That’s what those signs are about…

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.