can’t stop

Posted on Tuesday 22 April 2008


During a speech yesterday at the conservative Manhattan Institute, Vice President Dick Cheney claimed that Congress “does have a way, at times, of missing big opportunities and losing sight of big responsibilities.” As an example, Cheney criticized House Democrats for allowing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to expire: "In the field of international security at present, the House leadership has allowed a critical statute to expire — the FISA, or Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, a law that gives intelligence professionals the tools they need to monitor terrorist-related communications."

However, there is one slight kink in Cheney’s argument: House Democrats have not allowed FISA to expire. FISA is the law passed in 1978 — and still on the books — that governs the federal government’s communications monitoring. House Democrats actually “allowed” the Protect America Act (PAA) to expire, a revision to FISA that expanded the government’s authority to eavesdrop on Americans’ domestic-to-foreign communications without a warrant. Indeed, as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) noted after the House voted to reject the PAA’s extension: "[T]he underlying Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which provides for the surveillance of terrorists and provides that in emergencies surveillance can begin without warrant, remains intact and available to our intelligence agencies."

In the speech, Cheney seemed to be referring to the PAA, saying “[T]his is not an old law we’re talking about.” But in claiming that FISA “expired” in prepared remarks, Cheney is advancing the false White House line that because House Democrats did not extend the PAA permanently — with immunity for telecommunications companies — the government can no longer eavesdrop on suspected terrorists…
There is no rational reason for Cheney to attack Congress. Since the Democratic Party took slim control, the Congress has gone along with actually more than was reasonable. This is an example of one of the few things Congress has been able to get done, yet the Vice President is framing it as, "losing sight of big responsibilities. …the House leadership has allowed a critical statute to expire — the FISA, or Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, a law that gives intelligence professionals the tools they need to monitor terrorist-related communications."
At times, I think that some of the things they’ve done might be excused because of the magnitude of the 9/11 attack. But this is why that formulation is naive. F.I.S.A. is intact – with oversight. Yet, he can’t stop. He can’t lose. Another naive formulation – he does it because he’s a control freak, or a neoconservative. But it doesn’t pay to trust this man with benign purposes. Why is he so stuck on "no oversight" for domestic spying? It’s a good question, even if it does sound paranoid…

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.