what a world…

Posted on Saturday 20 December 2008

I’ve found a terminally boring 1boringoldman topic – Hedge Funds. I know I’m just passing the time until the holidays are over and Bush is finally headed back to Texas. Maybe it’s also because it’s been gray, foggy, and rainy for weeks here in Georgia and there’s lots of time to rattle around. But at least part of my interest in this droll subject is that the Hedge Fund Managers are playing with a lot of America’s wealth, and I don’t even know what a Hedge Fund is. If you do, read something else. And Bernard Madoff was passing as a Hedge Fund Manager of sorts…

Alfred Jones was born in Melbourne, Australia in 1901 to American parents. He moved to the United States as a young child, graduated from Harvard in 1923 and became a U.S. diplomat in the early 1930s, working in Berlin, Germany. He earned a PhD in sociology from Columbia University and joined the editorial staff at Fortune magazine in the early 1940s.

It was while writing an article about current investment trends for Fortune in 1948 that Jones was inspired to try his hand at managing money. He raised $100,000 and set forth to try to minimize the risk in holding long-term stock positions by short selling other stocks. This investing innovation is now referred to as the classic long/short equities model. Jones also employed leverage in an effort to enhance returns.

In 1952, Jones altered the structure of his investment vehicle, converting it from a general partnership to a limited partnership and adding a 20% incentive fee as compensation for the managing partner. As the first money manager to combine short selling, the use of leverage, shared risk through a partnership with other investors and a compensation system based on investment performance, Jones earned his place in investing history as the father of the hedge fund.
They talk like this. Short Selling is selling a stock you don’t own [I’m serious]. It’s a way to make money when a stock is going down. You sell it at some price, then cover the sale later by buying it hopefully at a lower price. That’s opposed to Going Long, which is buying a Stock and selling it later when it’s gone up. But Alfred did more than that. He put together a package of a number of stocks, some Long [he actually bought] and some Short [he’ll cover them later]. So the long/short equities model is that the combination of longs and shorts "hedged" his bet [thus the term Hedge Funds]. Success on either side, offset losses on the other. Leverage means that he invested borrowed money [I’m still serious]. And then he rolled it all together and tied his payback to profits. "Give me 1% for doing it and 20% of what I make for you. If I lose my [your] ass, I still get my 1%."

If you read the linked article above, it talks about how the Hedge Funds have come and gone over the last sixty years. What’s the difference between investing in a Hedge Fund and just buying Stocks or Mutual Funds. There are a couple of huge differences. For one, they keep the size of their client roster small [small numbers, big money]. That’s just one on the many ways they avoid regulation. So this is a investment opportunity for the filthy rich. But there’s another reason:

Hedge funds are like mutual funds in two respects: (1) they are pooled investment vehicles … and (2) they invest in publicly traded securities. But there are important differences between a hedge fund and a mutual fund… investors give hedge funds the freedom to pursue absolute return strategies.

Mutual Funds Seek Relative Returns
… A mutual fund’s goal is to beat the index … even if only modestly. If the index is down 10% while the mutual fund is down only 7%, the fund’s performance would be called a success. On the passive-active spectrum, on which pure index investing is the passive extreme, mutual funds lie somewhere in the middle as they semi-actively aim to generate returns that are favorable compared to a benchmark.

Hedge Funds Actively Seek Absolute Returns

Hedge funds lie at the active end of the investing spectrum as they seek positive absolute returns, regardless of the performance of an index or sector benchmark. Unlike mutual funds, which are "long-only", a hedge fund engages in more aggressive strategies and positions, such as short selling, trading in derivative instruments like options and using leverage  to enhance the risk/reward profile of their bets.
That’s it. I told you it was boring. But I have some things to say about Hedge Funds still. There are paradoxes everywhere in this story. They are pointing towards making money no matter what happens in the Market itself. And the term Hedge Fund implies safety – they’re "hedging" their bets so there’s less chance of losing. On the other hand, they avoid regulation; they borrow money to multiply their chances of winning big; the sell stocks they haven’t yet bought [short]; and they trade in derivative instruments which are mostly side bets like in a Casino – unregulated and unseen. So the paradox is that they sound safe because the strategies are developed to beat the indexes – always looking to profit. And yet they are bottom feeders, trading unintelligible things in what amounts to a backroom Casino with nobody looking.

So, why do you or I care if the wealthy want to do this paradoxical thing with their money? It’s theirs to do with as they like. Well, read Klugman in my previous post. It doesn’t do anything for the companies whose stocks they buy. They’re not investing in America. They’re taking money out of the Market by treating it like a poorly managed Casino. It removes value from our country and concentrates the wealth in the accounts of the already very wealthy. And it’s sleazy, and is turning us into a nation of sleazes – not unlike human traffickers and arms dealers who will do anything to make profit for themselves. What the Hedge Funds do is legal, but it’s sucking the blood out of our system and out of our ethos. Sell what you haven’t bought and cover it later. Borrow money to bet with. Cover your bets with side bets. Don’t let anyone really see what you’re doing. Bernard Madoff lived in the loopholes such a system provides and was apparently just a plain old crook. But even the people who play it straight are crooks in a way – because they’re degrading our Market [and our morality] into a racket [in a betting parlor].

There’s a piece of this Madoff story that would be funny if it weren’t so tragic. Why did people invest with Bernard Madoff instead of with other more transparent [opaque] Hedge Funds? Well, Bernie didn’t actually qualify as a Hedge Fund Manager partly because he didn’t take 20% of the profits. He wasn’t greedy enough! That’s why the insiders in other Hedge Funds knew he was a fraud. They knew he couldn’t make that kind of money doing what they were doing. But what Hedge Funds actually do is so obscure and impenetrable that Madoff’s investors couldn’t see it. His clients were trying to beat even the Hedge Funds by investing with the lowest bidder. In a world where greed reigns supreme, it was his "ungreediness" that played to the greed of his clients.

I left out the funds of funds which group many hedge funds into one product, thereby hedging on the Hedge Funds. Madoff’s products were embedded in some of these too. In the endless attempt to avoid compromise between greed and safety and get both, the resultant complexity creates infinite spaces for racketeering. Enron, then Madoff. Who’s next?…

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.