… This one, however, is loaded with meaning because LaHood is no ordinary member of Congress. He has been, as Shields pointed out, one of the most widely respected members of the House; a leader in the uphill struggle for comity between the parties; and a throwback to the days of his old boss Bob Michel, the minority leader who resisted the scorched-earth tactics of Newt Gingrich. Such was LaHood’s reputation for fairness that he was the natural choice to preside over the House during the explosive impeachment proceedings against Bill Clinton.
The significance of his accepting Obama’s offer goes beyond the signal it sends of the new president’s seriousness about outreach to moderate Republicans. As transportation secretary, LaHood will be at the center of the road and bridge construction projects Obama plans to make the highlight of his almost trillion-dollar stimulus program.
All the signs are that the stimulus spending will be opposed by congressional Republicans, whose shrunken ranks are increasingly dominated by right-wing Southerners who care not what their stance does to harm the party’s national image…
The danger became apparent as far back as 2007. With Bush weakened by the Iraq war, Hurricane Katrina and the midterm election losses of 2006, a Southern-led revolt killed his immigration reform bill. Junior senators such as Jim DeMint of South Carolina directed the rebellion, and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, unable to stem the insurgency, joined it.
The price was paid in the 2008 presidential campaign. Despite his personal credentials as a sponsor of comprehensive immigration reform, John McCain was caught in the backlash of anti-GOP voting by Hispanics…
The same thing happened this year when Bush supported a bailout for the Big Three auto companies. Led by Republican senators from Southern states where there are many foreign-owned auto plants, the Senate refused to cut off a filibuster against the bill to provide bridge loans to General Motors and Chrysler…
The Southern domination of the congressional Republican Party has become more complete with each and every election…
LaHood, who witnessed but did not welcome the Gingrich "revolution" in the House, has watched with growing alarm the decimation of the GOP in Illinois and surrounding states. As point man for Obama’s stimulus spending, he now poses the dilemma for his own party in the sharpest possible terms: Will congressional Republicans again sacrifice their political interest to satisfy their Southern-baked ideological imperatives?
In the period following the Civil War, Reconstruction took place. The Union Army occupied the states of the former Confederacy, enforcing federal law protecting the rights of blacks, many of whom were freed slaves. Reconstruction abruptly ended in 1877, obliterating many of the gains that had been made in securing political and civil rights for blacks. When Reconstruction ended, the so-called "Redemption" occurred, disenfranchisement began anew, and the region gave its political allegiance almost entirely to the Democratic Party, giving it the name the "Solid South."
In the 1930s, after the New Deal under Franklin Delano Roosevelt, a realignment occurred. Much of the Democratic Party shifted towards economic intervention and support for civil rights and liberties. After the crises of the Great Depression, World War II, and the beginning of the Cold War, Southern Democrats began to drift from the mainstream of the party. The formation of the Dixiecrat movement heralded an end to the New Deal coalition. For more than a century, white Southerners had overwhelmingly been Democrats, but in 1948 many bolted from the party, angered by Harry Truman’s efforts to abolish or ameliorate the effects of racial segregation, and supported Strom Thurmond’s third-party candidacy for president.
2004 | 2008 |
by County [Geographic] |
by County [Geographic] |
by County [Population] |
by County [Population] |
If you look at the Cartograms, those red lines are "rural" America – the places in the spaces that I’m talking about. The only real difference between the South and the rest of the country is that we have more of it ["spaces"]. Even though Sarah Palin is from the least Southern place in the Nation, she’s one of "us" – from little old Wasilla, Alaska. She might as well have been from Tupelo, Mississippi or Albany, Georgia. I don’t question that the South and its racial history adds something to the mix, but I think my point is still a valid one. The Republican Party has become the party of the spaces, and the real split in the U.S.A. is urban/rural – the city and the country. Those blue spots in the non-coastal parts of the Country are the Cities that show up as large on this map because it’s based on population, not surface area.
Dare I venture this argument a bit further? Even the dressed up and semi-articulate right wing Republicans (Saxby, Stevens, the pervert from Idaho) are essentially rednecks. By redneck, I mean a cloistered mind, xenophobic world view, a generalized, instinctive intolerance, enduring arrogance of righteousness in thought and action and a penchant for the lowest possible brow of humor (cf. Cheney’s slur on the state of West Virginia). What else can underlie the re-release of a supposed political satire by a ranking Republican (the tasteless and nasty slur on the President – elect in the form of song)? Some of my best friends are rednecks and it is a wholesale unfairness on my part to impute Mickey’s “spaces” with such a rough label to all the folk occupying same. Moreover, my own favorite places are in those spaces and I go to lengths to get to them. Still….