what was the point?

Posted on Friday 24 April 2009


In a heartbreaking and infuriating article at Huffington Post, Greg Mitchell recounts what happened when a person of conscience was confronted with Bush Administration inhumanity:
    With each new revelation on U.S. torture in Iraq, Afghanistan and Gitmo (and who, knows, probably elsewhere), I am reminded of the chilling story of Alyssa Peterson, who I have written about numerous times in the past three years but now with especially sad relevance. Appalled when ordered to take part in interrogations that, no doubt, involved what we would call torture, she refused, then killed herself a few days later, in September 2003.
Peterson should be hailed as a martyr and a national heroine. But the military, of course, engaged in a cover-up. The cause of her death was listed as a "non-hostile weapons discharge"- possibly accidental. An intrepid local reporter named Kevin Elston, from her home state of Arizona, decided to do what national reporters now so infrequently do: investigate and report.
    Here’s what the Flagstaff public radio station, KNAU, where Elston now works, reported: "Peterson objected to the interrogation techniques used on prisoners. She refused to participate after only two nights working in the unit known as the cage. Army spokespersons for her unit have refused to describe the interrogation techniques Alyssa objected to. They say all records of those techniques have now been destroyed." The official probe of her death would later note that earlier she had been "reprimanded" for showing "empathy" for the prisoners.
Empathy being anathema to the Bush-Cheney war criminal cabal. The contents of her notebook were blacked out. The contents of her suicide note were never revealed, and it has since disappeared. Her parents, of course, were told nothing about any of this. Elston summarized the comments reported to the Army by Peterson’s colleagues:
    "The reactions to the suicide were that she was having a difficult time separating her personal feelings from her professional duties. That was the consistent point in the testimonies, that she objected to the interrogation techniques, without describing what those techniques were."
Alyssa Peterson deserved better, and continues to deserve better. Bush Administration war crimes should be called for what they were, and those responsible should be held accountable according to the law. And Peterson should be remembered as a great American and a great human being. For showing humanity under extreme duress. For dying for it.
This has always been an impossible story. I can hear some macho seargant making some anti female wise crack, or some politician saying that she shouldn’t have been there if she felt that way – blaming her for her reaction rather than hearing what she was trying to say. And it’s hard to imagine reprimanding her for "showing empathy for the prisoners."

But there’s more to this story that just its obvious tragedy. Alyssa wasn’t in the C.I.A. or the F.B.I. She wasn’t a crusty contractor. She was just a soldier in the Army, trained to be an interpreter, assigned to a military intelligence unit. Neither Jay Bybee nor John Yoo had written Memos to cover her actions or direct her dealing with prisoners. She was operating under the auspices of the Army Field Manual – a document informed by the Geneva Conventions. Alyssa had been in the Army for three years and had become fluent in Arabic. It is highly unlikely that she was uninformed about what she was going to see, so it’s safe to say that she was reacting to something unexpected. She was deployed to Iraq in February 2003. We invaded Iraq on March 20th, 2003, so she was there from the start. She committed suicide on September 15th, 2003 – shortly after seeing whatever she objected to. After her death, her suicide was covered over, listed as a "noncombat weapons discharge." Her diary, suicide note, and all records of the sessions she witnessed were destroyed.

To me, that all means that a routine Army Intelligence Unit was torturing Iraqi prisoners some six months into the war. Abu Ghraib was not a fluke. We know that now. Torture was part of Gitmo and secret C.I.A. Prisons. That’s common knowledge. But I didn’t have in my mind that regular Army Units were torturing prisoners in a way that was intolerable to a trained army intelligence soldier – likely going beyond the limits proscribed in the Army Field Manual. I also doubt that whatever was being done represented "rogue soldiers."  Alyssa was reprimanded by a superior and then transferred out of her unit. She was being dealt with through the chain of command. So, whatever happened was part of some standard procedure, and the "cover up" behavior sounds  systemmatic as well. These events were around the same time as the Abu Ghraid abuses.

We don’t yet have the whole story. Right now, we’re hearing about all these "special prisoners." Allysa wasn’t involved with the masterminds of 9/11. Her Unit was dealing with routine prisoners of war. What in the hell were we doing? What were our children being taught to do? What was the point?
  1.  
    April 25, 2009 | 9:00 PM
     

    If I’m not mistaken, this was well before the famous Yoo-Bybee whitewash, so whoever was responsible for torture at that time cannot claim they were operating under the DoJ claim of legality.

  2.  
    April 25, 2009 | 9:03 PM
     

    This reminds me of a Mike Lukowich cartoon in the AJC a few days ago:

    Dimunitive dubya, with the big ears, sitting dwarfed behind his big desk. He’s apparently being questioned, and in the background is a banner “Truth Commission.”

    Peeking out from behind a curtain to one side is an evil looking Dick Cheney.

    The caption, dubya speaking: “I was just following orders.”

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.