why?

Posted on Thursday 10 September 2009


A Decade With No Income Gains
New York Times

By David Leonhardt
September 10, 2009

The typical American household made less money last year than the typical household made a full decade ago. To me, that’s the big news from the Census Bureau’s annual report on income, poverty and health insurance, which was released this morning. Median household fell to $50,303 last year, from $52,163 in 2007. In 1998, median income was $51,295. All these numbers are adjusted for inflation.

In the four decades that the Census Bureau has been tracking household income, there has never before been a full decade in which median income failed to rise. [The previous record was seven years, ending in 1985.] Other Census data suggest that it also never happened between the late 1940s and the late 1960s. So it doesn’t seem to have happened since at least the 1930s. And the streak probably won’t end in 2009, either. Unemployment has been rising all year, which is a strong sign income will fall.

What’s going on here? It’s a combination of two trends. One, economic growth in the current decade has been slower than in any decade since before World War II. Two, inequality has risen sharply, so much of the bounty from our growth has gone to a relatively small slice of the population.
This is palpably true. Note the period from 2000 to 2008. Flatter than a pancake. I expect if you factored out the very wealthy, it would look even worse. Here is the serial GINI Coefficient [measure of Wealth Inequity] for the U.S.:
 
and …
and …
So here’s the question that all of this raises for me. Why does anyone in the middle of America, the solidly middle class and under, regularly support the Republicans who did this to them – create a situation where they get the very short end of the stick? Flat Income. No Health Insurance. Poverty. Debt.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.