a sad tale…

Posted on Sunday 24 January 2010

I will admit to having a romantic view of Haiti – a French speaking Western African culture suffused with Catholicism, Voodoo, corruption, and seeming endless poverty. I had no knowledge of Haiti’s history and would recommend this article in its entirety if you are as in-the-dark as I am. I’ve pulled out only some major landmarks along the way…
To Heal Haiti, Look to History, Not Nature
New York Times – oped

By MARK DANNER
January 21, 2010

HAITI is everybody’s cherished tragedy. Long before the great earthquake struck the country like a vengeful god, the outside world, and Americans especially, described, defined, marked Haiti most of all by its suffering. Epithets of misery clatter after its name like a ball and chain: Poorest country in the Western Hemisphere. One of the poorest on earth. For decades Haiti’s formidable immiseration has made it among outsiders an object of fascination, wonder and awe. Sometimes the pity that is attached to the land — and we see this increasingly in the news coverage this past week — attains a tone almost sacred, as if Haiti has taken its place as a kind of sacrificial victim among nations, nailed in its bloody suffering to the cross of unending destitution…

In 1804 the free Republic of Haiti was declared in almost unimaginable triumph: hard to exaggerate the glory of that birth. Hundreds of thousands of enslaved Africans had labored to make Saint-Domingue, as Haiti was then known, the richest colony on earth, a vastly productive slave-powered factory producing tons upon tons of sugar cane, the 18th-century’s great cash crop. … by the time the slaves launched their great revolt in 1791, most of those half-million blacks had been born in Africa, spoke African languages, worshipped African gods. … the United States refused for nearly six decades even to recognize Haiti [Abraham Lincoln finally did so in 1862]. Along with the great colonial powers, America instead rewarded Haiti’s triumphant slaves with a suffocating trade embargo — and a demand that in exchange for peace the fledgling country pay enormous reparations to its former colonial overseer…

At its apex, the white colonists were supplanted by a new ruling class, made up largely of black and mulatto officers. Though these groups soon became bitter political rivals, they were as one in their determination to maintain in independent Haiti the cardinal principle of governance inherited from Saint-Domingue: the brutal predatory extraction of the country’s wealth by a chosen powerful few… Unable to replace the whites in their plantation manors, Haiti’s new elite moved from owning the land to fighting to control the one institution that could tax its products: the government. While the freed slaves worked their small fields, the powerful drew off the fruits of their labor through taxes… “Pluck the chicken,” proclaimed Dessalines — now Emperor Jacques I — “but don’t make it scream.”

In 1915 the whites returned: the United States Marines disembarked to enforce continued repayment of the original debt and to put an end to an especially violent struggle for power that, in the shadow of World War I and German machinations in the Caribbean, suddenly seemed to threaten American interests. During their nearly two decades of rule, the Americans built roads and bridges, centralized the Haitian state — setting the stage for the vast conurbation of greater Port-au-Prince that we see today in all its devastation — and sent Haitians abroad to be educated as agronomists and doctors in the hope of building a more stable middle class. Still, by the time they finally left, little in the original system had fundamentally changed. Haitian nationalism, piqued by the reappearance of white masters who had forced Haitians to work in road gangs, produced the noiriste movement that finally brought to power in 1957 François Duvalier, the most brilliant and bloody of Haiti’s dictators, who murdered tens of thousands while playing adroitly on cold-war America’s fear of communism to win American acceptance.

Duvalier’s epoch, which ended with the overthrow of his son Jean-Claude in 1986, ushered in Haiti’s latest era of instability, which has seen, in barely a quarter-century, several coups and revolutions, a handful of elections [aborted, rigged and, occasionally, fair], a second American occupation [whose accomplishments were even more ephemeral than the first] and, all told, a dozen Haitian rulers. Less and less money now comes from the land, for Haiti’s topsoil has grown enfeebled from overproduction and lack of investment… Haitians have grown up in a certain kind of struggle for individuality and for power, and the country has proved itself able to absorb the ardent attentions of outsiders who, as often as not, remain blissfully unaware of their own contributions to what Haiti is. Like the ruined bridges strewn across the countryside — one of the few traces of the Marines and their occupation nearly a century ago — these attentions tend to begin in evangelical zeal and to leave little lasting behind.

What might, then? America could start by throwing open its markets to Haitian agricultural produce and manufactured goods, broadening and making permanent the provisions of a promising trade bill negotiated in 2008… Second, the United States and other donors could make a formal undertaking to ensure that the vast amounts that will soon pour into the country for reconstruction go not to foreigners but to Haitians — and not only to Haitian contractors and builders but to Haitian workers, at reasonable wages… Putting money in people’s hands will not make Haiti’s predatory state disappear. But in time, with rising incomes and a concomitant decentralization of power, it might evolve.

In coming days much grander ambitions are sure to be declared, just as more scenes of disaster and disorder will transfix us, more stunning and colorful images of irresistible calamity. We will see if the present catastrophe, on a scale that dwarfs all that have come before, can do anything truly to alter the reality of Haiti.
Haiti is a testimony to the evils of colonialism – a former French Colony populated by slaves from Africa. Their revolution left them with no tradition of government and they have spent the last 200 years as a corrupt, failed state. We haven’t been much help. Early on, we feared a slave rebellion here and shunned Haiti. Later, we extracted reparations. And our policies have been paternalistic at best. Haiti’s history epitomizes the lyric, "nothing from nothing leaves nothing." Mark Danner summarizes:
Haitians have grown up in a certain kind of struggle for individuality and for power, and the country has proved itself able to absorb the ardent attentions of outsiders who, as often as not, remain blissfully unaware of their own contributions to what Haiti is. Like the ruined bridges strewn across the countryside — one of the few traces of the Marines and their occupation nearly a century ago — these attentions tend to begin in evangelical zeal and to leave little lasting behind.
Haiti is the size of one of our smallest states [between Massachusetts and Vermont] but has a population equal to some of our most populous [between Ohio and Michigan]. The per capita GDP is about 2.5% of ours. It’s a homogeneous country – 95% Black, 80% Catholic, 50% practice Voodoo. The country has been essentially deforested by people making charcoal. The picture shows the border between Haiti [left] and the Dominican Republic [right].

In spite of the depressing history and state of affairs even before the earthquake, Haiti has surprised the world recently. The AIDS epidemic hit hard there and was predicted to wipe out a third of their population. That didn’t happen. The incidence of HIV is now 2% – triple our rate, but well below the other third world countries.

With so many problems, what’s to happen now? While Danner’s op-ed makes some positive suggestions, one is left with the sense that more is needed for Haiti to escape its historical curse. Is there such a thing as a U.N. Protectorate? In spite of the story of misfired paternalism, it’s hard to imagine Haiti without long term outside direction right now…
  1.  
    Woody
    January 24, 2010 | 10:45 AM
     

    I just found this exquisitely on-point response to Pat Robertson’s charge (that Haiti’s earthquake is blowback from their pact with Mephistopheles) in the 1/15/10 edition of the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, penned not by the Prince of Freaking Darkness but by citizen Lilly Coyle of Minneapolis:

    Dear Pat Robertson,
    I know that you know that all press is good press, so I appreciate the shout-out. And you make God look like a big mean bully who kicks people when they are down, so I’m all over that action. But when you say that Haiti has made a pact with me, it is totally humiliating. I may be evil incarnate, but I’m no welcher.

    The way you put it, making a deal with me leaves folks desperate and impoverished. Sure, in the afterlife, but when I strike bargains with people, they first get something here on earth — glamour, beauty, talent, wealth, fame, glory, a golden fiddle. Those Haitians have nothing, and I mean nothing. And that was before the earthquake. Haven’t you seen “Crossroads”? Or “Damn Yankees”?
    If I had a thing going with Haiti, there’d be lots of banks, skyscrapers, SUVs, exclusive night clubs, Botox — that kind of thing. An 80 percent poverty rate is so not my style. Nothing against it — I’m just saying: Not how I roll.

    You’re doing great work, Pat, and I don’t want to clip your wings — just, come on, you’re making me look bad. And not the good kind of bad. Keep blaming God. That’s working. But leave me out of it, please. Or we may need to renegotiate your own contract.

    Best, Satan

  2.  
    January 24, 2010 | 4:35 PM
     

    Wow! Straight from the horses mouth…

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.