dadt…

Posted on Tuesday 9 February 2010


Smoke the Bigots Out of the Closet
New York Times

By FRANK RICH
February 6, 2010

A funny thing happened after Adm. Mike Mullen called for gay men and lesbians to serve openly in the military: A curious silence befell much of the right. If this were a Sherlock Holmes story, it would be the case of the attack dogs that did not bark. John McCain, commandeering the spotlight as usual, did fulminate against the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell.” But the press focus on McCain, the crazy man in Washington’s attic, was misleading. His yapping was an exception, not the rule.

Many of his Republican colleagues said little or nothing. The right’s noise machine was on mute. The Fox News report on Mullen’s testimony was fair and balanced — and brief. The network dropped the subject entirely in the Hannity-O’Reilly hothouse of prime time that night… The occasional outliers notwithstanding, why did such a hush greet Mullen on Capitol Hill? The answer begins with the simple fact that a large majority of voters — between 61 percent and 75 percent depending on the poll — now share his point of view. Most Americans recognize that being gay is not a “lifestyle” but an immutable identity, and that outlawing discrimination against gay people who want to serve their country is, as the admiral said, “the right thing to do.”

Mullen’s heartfelt, plain-spoken testimony gave perfect expression to the nation’s own slow but inexorable progress on the issue. He said he had “served with homosexuals since 1968” and that his views had evolved “cumulatively” and “personally” ever since. So it has gone for many other Americans in all walks of life. As more gay people have come out — a process that accelerated once the modern gay rights movement emerged from the Stonewall riots of 1969 — so more heterosexuals have learned that they have gay relatives, friends, neighbors, teachers and co-workers. It is hard to deny our own fundamental rights to those we know, admire and love…

The arguments for preserving “don’t ask” have long been blatantly groundless. McCain — who said in 2006 that he would favor repealing the law if military leaders ever did — didn’t even bother to offer a logical explanation for his mortifying flip-flop last week… Colin Powell strafed him just hours later, when he announced that changed “attitudes and circumstances” over the past 17 years have led him to agree with Mullen. McCain is even out of step with his own family’s values. Both his wife, Cindy, and his daughter Meghan have posed for the current California ad campaign explicitly labeling opposition to same-sex marriage as hate.

McCain aside, the most common last-ditch argument for preserving “don’t ask” heard last week, largely from Southern senators, is to protect “troop morale and cohesion.” Every known study says this argument is a canard, as do the real-life examples of the many armies with openly gay troops, including those of Canada, Britain and Israel…

The more bigotry pushed out of the closet for all voters to see, the more likely it is that Americans will be moved to grant overdue full citizenship to gay Americans. It won’t happen overnight, any more than full civil rights for African-Americans immediately followed Truman’s desegregation of the armed forces. But there can be no doubt that Mike Mullen’s powerful act of conscience last week, just as we marked the 50th anniversary of the Greensboro, N.C., lunch counter sit-in, pushed history forward. The revealing silence that followed from so many of the usual suspects was pretty golden too.
I wonder if anyone ever really believed that homosexuality is a "lifestyle"  rather than an "immutable identity." I don’t know that I ever did. I’ve had some gay friends and a few patients who tried to believe it, with some time-limited success. Growing up in the South, I don’t think I ever knew an "out" homosexual until I was an adult. Looking back, it was like the situation with racial segregation. I never really knew a black american, just as I never really knew a homosexual person. Admiral Mullen’s story is even more poignant than Rich allows:
Mullen’s heartfelt, plain-spoken testimony gave perfect expression to the nation’s own slow but inexorable progress on the issue. He said he had “served with homosexuals since 1968” and that his views had evolved “cumulatively” and “personally” ever since. So it has gone for many other Americans in all walks of life. As more gay people have come out — a process that accelerated once the modern gay rights movement emerged from the Stonewall riots of 1969 — so more heterosexuals have learned that they have gay relatives, friends, neighbors, teachers and co-workers. It is hard to deny our own fundamental rights to those we know, admire and love…
It shouldn’t take from 1968-2010. When people are exposed to real people, prejudice seems to me to begin to dissolve. But it requires a specific kind of encounter. I think one of the best examples is how slowly the issues of women in society came to the fore. I certainly knew plenty of women, but it took knowing and hearing the issues too. Prejudice, at the core, comes in two flavors – ignorance and sickness. There’s a slow progress with the former. It responds to encounter and confrontation. The latter is much more difficult.

When ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ was first instituted, I thought it was silly compromise. It seemed to say, "so long as you stay in the closet, everything is okay." Looking back, I think it was brilliant because it said, "it’s just prejudice." What was labeled as needing to be dealt with was prejudice rather than homosexuality itself. As Admiral Mullen said, "… he had ‘served with homosexuals since 1968’ and that his views had evolved ‘cumulatively’ and ‘personally’ ever since."

Redefining the problem with DADT created a situation that changed attitudes. While I never saw that coming. Looking back, it makes sense. Prejudice is amenable to proximity and encounter. DADT allowed that to happen…

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.