magnet?…

Posted on Thursday 20 May 2010

It’s only been 16 years since Newt Gingrich led the charge for the Republican’s Contract with America that gave his Party control of both Houses of Congress. It was the time of the rise of the Religious Right Republicans and the insertion of the "culture wars" into political dialogue. House Speaker Gingrich himself resigned from Congress in an ethics scandal the next year to be replaced by Tom Delay  [who later resigned in an ethics scandal]. That Class of 94 has given us a few more scandals along the way: John Ensign, Mark Foley, Mark Sanford, Bob Ney, Mark Souder. The campaign rhetoric from those days is largely forgotten, even by the people espousing it. They failed to pass legislation to limit Congressional terms, and a number of them broke their pledge of self limiting terms going on to become the very "career politicians" they campaigned against back then. And while we remember that election by the sweep of Congress, it was also the year George W. Bush was elected Governor of Texas, defeating Ann Richards.

From my perspective, it’s really difficult to articulate out how this particular system has been so successful – or, for that matter, successful at all. They run on a platform that claims the highest moral ground, but then they ignore that very ground with surprising regularity – like our new friend Mark Souder. In his resignation speech, he said:
I am so sorry to have let so many friends down, people who have fought so hard for me. The ideas we advocate are still just and right. America will survive and thrive when anchored in those values. Human beings, like me, will fail, but our cause is greater than individuals. It is based upon eternal truths. By stepping aside, my mistake cannot be used as a political football in a partisan attempt to undermine the cause for which I have labored all my adult life.
It’s hard to imagine what he’s even talking about; "our cause is greater than individuals"; "the ideas we advocate are still just and right"; "based upon eternal truths"; or "a partisan attempt to undermine the cause for which I have labored all my adult life." Nobody, at least nobody I know about, is planning to use his behavior to argue the case for marital infidelity. And about the only thing I can think of as his "cause" are some notions about regulating the sexuality of others [rather than his own]. His promiscuity doesn’t change how we feel about his attempts to limit the freedom of groups he doesn’t like – we still think he is/was out of line just like we did last week. Like so many members of the Class of 94, he’s superfluous. irrelevant, and immaterial – chasing the windmills of his own parochial view of the world rather than addressing anything that much matters.

It seems like the pendulum during my lifetime is out of balance. It swung left for JFK and LBJ but then it went screaming right for Nixon Ford. It swung back briefly for Carter, then there were twelve years of Reagan Bush. We had eight years of Clinton [struggling with the Class of 94], then back again to eight years of Bush [Cheney]. Here we are not two years into Obama, and the damn thing feels like it’s swinging back. It’s way out of whack.

Meanwhile, we have to put up with clowns like Rouder whose agenda hasn’t got much to do with government, and whose morality is both archaic and woefully deficient at the same time. Reaganomics, a Thousand Points of Light, the Contract with America, the Class of 94, Compassionate Conservatism, TEA Parties. Does this country have a magnet on the Right? Or is it the constant barrage of Talking Points that pulls us that way?
It sure isn’t talent or wisdom. Whatever it is that pulls us to the Mark Souders of the world, I cry foul…

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.