$14.6 billion…

Posted on Thursday 2 September 2010


Child’s Ordeal Shows Risks of Psychosis Drugs for Young
New York Times

By DUFF WILSON
September 1, 2010

OPELOUSAS, La. — At 18 months, Kyle Warren started taking a daily antipsychotic drug on the orders of a pediatrician trying to quell the boy’s severe temper tantrums. Kyle Warren at 6 years old. At 18 months, Kyle started taking a daily antipsychotic drug on the orders of a pediatrician trying to quell the boy’s severe temper tantrums. Thus began a troubled toddler’s journey from one doctor to another, from one diagnosis to another, involving even more drugs. Autism, bipolar disorder, hyperactivity, insomnia, oppositional defiant disorder. The boy’s daily pill regimen multiplied: the antipsychotic Risperdal, the antidepressant Prozac, two sleeping medicines and one for attention-deficit disorder. All by the time he was 3.

He was sedated, drooling and overweight from the side effects of the antipsychotic medicine. Although his mother, Brandy Warren, had been at her “wit’s end” when she resorted to the drug treatment, she began to worry about Kyle’s altered personality. “All I had was a medicated little boy,” Ms. Warren said. “I didn’t have my son. It’s like, you’d look into his eyes and you would just see just blankness.”

Today, 6-year-old Kyle is in his fourth week of first grade, scoring high marks on his first tests. He is rambunctious and much thinner. Weaned off the drugs through a program affiliated with Tulane University that is aimed at helping low-income families whose children have mental health problems, Kyle now laughs easily and teases his family. Ms. Warren and Kyle’s new doctors point to his remarkable progress — and a more common diagnosis for children of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder — as proof that he should have never been prescribed such powerful drugs in the first place…

More than 500,000 children and adolescents in America are now taking antipsychotic drugs, according to a September 2009 report by the Food and Drug Administration. Their use is growing not only among older teenagers, when schizophrenia is believed to emerge, but also among tens of thousands of preschoolers. A Columbia University study recently found a doubling of the rate of prescribing antipsychotic drugs for privately insured 2- to 5-year-olds from 2000 to 2007. Only 40 percent of them had received a proper mental health assessment, violating practice standards from the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

“There are too many children getting on too many of these drugs too soon,” Dr. Mark Olfson, professor of clinical psychiatry and lead researcher in the government-financed study, said. Such radical treatments are indeed needed, some doctors and experts say, to help young children with severe problems stay safe and in school or day care. In 2006, the F.D.A. did approve treating children as young as 5 with Risperdal if they had autistic disorder and aggressive behavior, self-injury tendencies, tantrums or severe mood swings. Two other drugs, Seroquel from AstraZeneca and Abilify from Bristol-Myers Squibb, are permitted for youths 10 or older with bipolar disorder.

[Note: I’m not personally convinced that bipolar disorder can even be diagnosed in childhood. But even if I’m wrong  about that and it can, I certainly wouldn’t choose one of those drugs to treat it.]
But many doctors say prescribing them for younger and younger children may pose grave risks to development of both their fast-growing brains and their bodies. Doctors can legally prescribe them for off-label use, including in preschoolers, even though research has not shown them to be safe or effective for children. Boys are far more likely to be medicated than girls…
It’s kind of a hard case, Kyle. One doesn’t usually diagnose ADHD in the first years of life. But that aside, this is a fine example of the way pharmaceutical manufacturers have invaded clinical medicine. In the past, pediatricians wouldn’t have been prescribing these powerful and toxic drugs in children at all. Actually, Child Psychiatrists wouldn’t have been prescribing these drugs except in unusual circumstances.
Dr. Ben Vitiello, chief of child and adolescent treatment and preventive research at the National Institute of Mental Health, says conditions in young children are extremely difficult to diagnose properly because of their emotional variability. “This is a recent phenomenon, in large part driven by the misperception that these agents are safe and well tolerated,” he said. Even the most reluctant prescribers encounter a marketing juggernaut that has made antipsychotics the nation’s top-selling class of drugs by revenue, $14.6 billion last year, with prominent promotions aimed at treating children. In the waiting room of Kyle’s original child psychiatrist, children played with Legos stamped with the word Risperdal, made by Johnson & Johnson. It has since lost its patent on the drug and stopped handing out the toys. Greg Panico, a company spokesman, said the Legos were not intended for children to play with — only as a promotional item.
Isn’t that precious – Johnson & Johnson was giving out Leggos for the Pediatricians, Child Psychiatrists, and office staff to play with. What a nice gesture.

It’s great that these articles are beginning to appear frequently. Physicians and Patients alike have been sold a bill of goods about these medications. The fact that antipsychotic medications are the Pharmaceutical Industry’s biggest sellers [$14.6 billion!] is beyond absurd – bordering over into criminal. It’s certainly not because psychosis is that prevalent – it’s not. It’s because the industry has successfully hyped the medications for other conditions with the unfortunately common help of physicians [often academic physicians] paid as key opinion leaders. As long as I’m on this topic, get those ads off of the television sets. "Ask your doctor if _____ is right for you." They don’t belong there. They are part of this problem.

Antipsychotics are helpful for treating kids who have temper tantrums because they are psychotic. That’s why we call them anti-psychotics. This kid, Kyle, needed a careful diagnosis and appropriate treatment. That’s true for all kids. He didn’t need people throwing big medicines at him without even being sure what they were treating…
  1.  
    September 2, 2010 | 1:24 PM
     

    It’s all so simple if you step back from it.

    Without the influence of money from Big Pharma, we recognize symptoms of illness and do research to try to understand what will help treat the underlying illness, as well as the symptoms.

    With BigPharma money — meaning the company’s profit is the prime driver — they discover a new drug, or stretch the facts to market a new use for an older drug, and then they manipulate doctors and patients to thinking they need this drug. Ergo: Big Profits for Big Pharma.

    Some Ancient once said: “the love of money is the root of all evil.”

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.