-
Renee L. Binder, MD
-
Mary Helen Davis, MD
-
Jeffrey Lieberman, MD
… letters in The Wall Street Journal [below] raise serious questions — including the propriety of a letter signed by 45 signatories — of who 38 are junior level faculty [Assistant Professors] at Emory where Dr. Nemeroff is “the boss of bosses.” They wrote: ““Dr. Nemeroff’s extremely productive and successful career as a leader in academic psychiatry, we have the utmost respect for his science and ethics.” If 38 of Emory’s faculty have “utmost respect for his science and ethics” — which have earned him considerable criticism, one must wonder about the scientific and ethical culture at Emory! Additionally, questions surely arise about how easy it might be for subordinates to refuse to show solidarity with “the boss of bosses.” The other seven signatories hold positions of authority and have almost as much of a financial stake in the business of psychiatry as does Dr. Nemeroff. [Alliance for Human Research Protection]
The Wall Street Journal Letters to the Editor Needless Furor Harms Outstanding Psychiatrist 19 September 2006 The furor arising from your article about the absence of a potential conflict of information statement in a scientific paper on vagal nerve stimulation therapy for depression ["Medical Journal Editor Nemeroff Steps Down Over Undisclosed Ties," Aug. 28] has potentially harmed the fields of medicine and psychiatry. Dr. Nemeroff was the lead author of the article in question, and all of the required individual conflicts were submitted to the journal, of which he was the editor, but they weren’t included due to a regrettable oversight at the level of administrative publication. Thus, the concern about this is much overdone, as Dr. Nemeroff has reported his collaboration with the maker of vagal nerve stimulators in numerous other publications, as well as public and academic presentations. Dr. Nemeroff’s decision not to pursue another appointment as editor of Neuropsychopharmacology is highly unfortunate, as this journal is more focused on the biological mechanisms of psychiatric diseases and their treatments than any other, and Dr. Nemeroff is extremely well-qualified to lead it. Due to Dr. Nemeroff’s extremely productive and successful career as a leader in academic psychiatry, he and others like him are asked to be on the boards of many pharmaceutical firms specializing in central nervous system agents. Through such collaborations, the development and testing of novel treatments are greatly enhanced and the safety of research subjects strengthened. Yes, these companies must make profits, but they also share with researchers a desire to find scientific truth, which usually isn’t as clear-cut as many believe. The overwhelming majority of academic researchers are proud of their independence and are dedicated to advancing their fields through quality research. At a time of diminishing funding, does it not make sense for industry-sponsored support to provide a viable alternative, especially if available in a no-strings-attached way with sufficient academic research oversight? We are academic psychiatrists and researchers who are colleagues of Charles Nemeroff, and we have the utmost respect for his science and ethics. Some of us receive research support from pharmaceutical companies, some from federal agencies, some from both and some from neither. All of us want the best for the fields of science, medicine and psychiatry in their endeavors to better humanity. |
|
Robert N. Golden, M.D. Dean, School of Medicine, U. Wisconsin Madison…
Ned H. Kalin, M.D. Chairman, Dept. Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin… Martin B. Keller, M.D. Chairman, Dept. Psychiatry, Brown University… Jeffrey A. Lieberman, M.D.: Chairman Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons… Thomas Schlaepfer, MD: Assistant Professor Dept. of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins… Michael E. Thase, M.D: Professor of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and the Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Pittsburgh, PA… |
By 2006, Dr. Nemeroff was completely out of control. I didn’t know how far out back then, but I knew enough to feel glad that someone had finally called his hand. The list of people signing from Emory made me sad. I knew most of them, and with some exceptions, they were decent people captured in the Nemeroff spell. But those outside people? They weren’t spellbound. I suspected that they were in the game too [even though back then I had no clue what the game really was, or how corrupt it had become]. Since then, that list has been branded on my mind.
From clinical research to clinical practice: a 4-year review of ziprasidone.
by Nemeroff CB, Lieberman JA, Weiden PJ, Harvey PD, Newcomer JW, Schatzberg AF, Kilts CD, and Daniel DG
CNS Spectrums. 2005 10(11 Suppl 17):1-20.
[full text on-line]
Ziprasidone is a second-generation antipsychotic that received Food and Drug Administration approval in February 2001. It has a unique receptor profile that includes high-affinity antagonist activity at dopamine D2 receptors, inverse agonist activity at serotonin (5-HT)2A receptors, agonist activity at 5-HTlA receptors, and a relatively high affinity for the serotonin and norepinephrine transporters. The 5-HTIA affinity, together with the inhibitory effect on mono-amine reuptake, may underlie the hypothesized beneficial effects on comorbid affective and cognitive abnormalities in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. The short-term efficacy of ziprasidone for core positive symptoms of schizophrenia appears to be comparable to other conventional and atypical antipsychotics. The short-term efficacy of ziprasidone in acute mania has been established based on two 3-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.Open-label treatment for up to 52 weeks confirms the sustained efficacy and safety of ziprasidone in bipolar disorder. Maintenance studies in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder indicate that long-term ziprasidone therapy is effective in preventing relapse, while maintaining cognitive and psychosocial benefits. The safety database suggests that the overall cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk associated with ziprasidone is lower than with other atypicals, with notably lower risk of drug-related increases in weight, glucose, or lipids. The data also suggest a modestly increased risk of QTc prolongation that is not dose related or linked to torsades de pointes. Switching to ziprasidone from other atypicals appears to improve both clinical symptoms and metabolic parameters, though more studies are needed to fully characterize these benefits. This monograph summarizes the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral ziprasidone in the treatment of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar mania.
This Clinical Information Monograph is based in part on an expert consensus roundtable entitled “From Clinical Research to Clinical Practice: A 4-Year Review of Ziprasidone,” held in New York City on June 27-28, 2004. The meeting was moderated by Prakash S. Masand, MD, and contributors included David G. Daniel, MD, Philip D. Harvey, PhD, Clinton D. Kilts, MD, Jeffrey A. Lieberman, MD, Charles B. Nemeroff, MD, PhD, John W. Newcomer, MD, Alan F. Schatzberg, MD, and Peter J. Weiden, MD.
This clinical information monograph is supported by Pfizer, Inc. Support of this monograph does not imply the commercial supporters’ agreement with the views expressed herein. Although every effort has been made to ensure that the information is presented accurately in this publication, the ultimate responsibility rests with the prescribing physician. Neither the publisher, the sponsor, nor the participants can be held responsible for errors or for any consequences arising from the use of information contained herein. Readers are strongly urged to consult any relevant primary literature. No claims or endorsements are made for any drug or compound at present under clinical investigation.
Re: the “boss of bosses” (and difficulty refusing to show solidarity)…
Is this medicine or is this the mob?!
Duane
Duane,
Yes.
Mickey,
Well then, if I were you, I’d give the brakes in your car a good check every morning… You never know when a brake can go out in the middle of the night…
On a more serious note, I’m not alone when I say, “Thank-you, sir” for all you’re doing to get the word out, including the countless hours you obviously put into sorting through the science, presenting the facts, and to the getting to heart of the matter.
My best,
Duane
Amen Duane. Thank you sir. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely and all that jazz.
How is it that Alan Schatzberg shows up in every single pharma-psychiatry scheme? He is the evil Zelig of psychiatry.
Clearly, it’s a club. Whenever you see a psychiatry “expert consensus” and pharma sponsorship, you’ll see the same rotating cast of the usual suspects.
Altostrata,
And the meaning of “the usual suspects” has become increasingly clear. My premise is that Jeffrey Lieberman’s presence in the company of “the usual suspects” brands him, particularly in one of those made-up roundtable, PHARMA-generated, infomercials. You don’t get there just by happenstance. You went to that neighborhood knowing the story. And if you went there once, you can go again. Lieberman’s been there lots of times [the CAFE study for example]. It’s a testimony to the level of denial in the high places of psychiatry that he was even nominated. Wasn’t one of those guys as president [Alan Schatzberg] enough for this century?
That is the best blog for anybody who needs to search out out about this topic. You understand so much its virtually onerous to argue with you (not that I actually would need?HaHa). You undoubtedly put a brand new spin on a subject thats been written about for years. Great stuff, simply great!