and…

Posted on Wednesday 11 April 2012


JNJ Told to Pay $1.1B in Arkansas Risperdal Trial
Bloomberg News
By Eric Francis and Jef Feeley
April 11, 2012

JNJ  was ordered to pay more than $1.1 billion by a judge after an Arkansas jury found the company’s officials misled doctors and patients about the risks of the antipsychotic drug Risperdal. Judge Tim Fox in Little Rock, Arkansas, today found J&J and its Janssen unit committed more than 238,000 violations of the state’s Medicaid fraud laws by illegally marketing Risperdal over an almost four-year period starting in 2002. Fox found each violation carried a $5,000 fine, pushing the total to more than $1.1 billion.

The penalty is the largest of the three handed down so far against New Brunswick, New Jersey-based J&J in state cases alleging the second-biggest (JNJ) maker of health products hid Risperdal’s risks and tricked Medicaid regulators into paying more than they should have for the medicine. “I think this ups the ante quite a bit on the other states’ cases targeting J&J’s Risperdal marketing,” Carl Tobias, who teaches product-liability law at the University Richmond law school, said in a telephone interview today. “I think the judge was sending a message – either settle these cases or litigate them at your peril.”

A state jury concluded yesterday that J&J’s Risperdal marketing violated both Medicare fraud laws and Arkansas’s deceptive trade practices statutes. Fox ordered the drugmaker to pay $11.4 million in penalties on the trade practices violations.“We are disappointed with the judge’s decision on penalties,” Teresa Mueller, a spokeswoman for J&J’s Janssen unit, said in an e-mailed statement. “If our motion for a new trial is denied, we will appeal”…

J&J Is Fined $1 Billion Over Risperdal Marketing
Pharmalot
By Ed Silverman
April 11, 2012

… Overall, J&J has not fared well in defending its Risperdal efforts. Last year, the health care giant was ordered by a South Carolina judge to pay $327 million for deceptive Risperdal marketing, which he called detestable. And in 2010, a Louisiana jury ordered J&J to pay $257.7 million in damages for making misleading safety claims, and $73 million in legal fees were later added.

In fact, the string of losses suggests J&J needs to pursue a settlement strategy. You may recall a deal with the feds unraveled after the health care giant balked at paying more than $1 billion. That deal had been reached prior to the recent settlement in Texas, however, prompting the feds to then seek a higher payout. Sources says the feds want J&J to pay anywhere from $1.3 billion to more than $1.8 billion and the Arkansas fine may embolden them to stand their ground.

“Johnson & Johnson needs to wake up and realize they are playing a losing game. They should be running, not walking, to the settlement table,” Patrick Burns of Taxpayers Against Fraud, a non-profit, tells us. “DoJ offered a global settlement for $1.8 billion last month. I am not sure that deal is going to stay on the table after this”…

  1.  
    April 12, 2012 | 7:04 AM
     

    Thank you for reporting this breaking news,the atypical antipsychotic drug promoters are ‘reaping the whirlwind’.My case was with Eli Lilly Zyprexa same saga.
    Four years of off-label Zyprexa use gave me life-long diabetes.-Daniel Haszard
    FMI zyprexa-victims(dot)com

  2.  
    April 12, 2012 | 11:53 AM
     

    I wonder how much in fines will penetrate pharma’s attitude towards drug marketing? J&J had before-tax profits of $17 billion in 2010, according to its annual report. Risperdal brought in revenues of $2 billion.

    If the fines from Texas, South Carolina, Louisiana, and Arkansas stick (they are all being appealed), they total about $2 billion.

    The US Justice Department is negotiating for more than $1 billion.

    I sure hope other states are seeing opportunities to get some compensation from J&J’s deep pockets.

  3.  
    April 14, 2012 | 1:13 AM
     

    J&J news http://pharmagossip.blogspot.com/2012/04/us-asks-court-to-force-j-executive-to.html U.S. asks court to force J&J executive to testify

  4.  
    Dan Abshear
    April 15, 2012 | 1:55 PM
     

    The thing is, such fines do not deter this type of behavior. Usually, such big pharma companies are also given corporate integrity agreements to compliment these deferred or non prosecution agreements. And, historically, they repeat often their wrongdoing, due to insufficient penalties imposed upon such big pharma corporations. All corporations need to be regulated more than they are presently. They are deliberately given dangerous autonomy in their operatons, and people get harmed as a result. And often, such corporations are never prosecuted in any way, due to their association with our government: http://www.henrymakow.com/i_was_a_corporate_whistle_blow.html

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.