hear me roar…

Posted on Tuesday 29 December 2009

Before I left, I was speculating about Tiger Woods’ Madonna Prostitute Complex based on his choice of loose women. I’ve been mildly obsessed with Iran since I got back, but I checked in on Tiger, and saw that the mistress count was in the teens now – all "easy" ladies. I got to thinking what might explain this sex-addiction that seems to predominate in his life and landed on the idea of androgenic steroids. If you put tiger woods steroids into Google®, there’s stuff to read, sure enough. Male hormones turn up the sex drive, sure enough. That’s what they’re for…


2000

2009
Mickey @ 7:10 AM

iran obsession redux…

Posted on Tuesday 29 December 2009


Iran’s turning point
Washington Post
Editorial

December 29, 200

ONE WAY or another, Sunday’s Ashura holiday in Iran probably will be a turning point in the struggle between an extremist regime and an increasingly radical opposition.
There is, however, more that could be done to help the Green Movement. Russia and non-Western nations should be pressed to join in condemning the regime’s violence. Sanctions aimed at the Revolutionary Guard and its extensive business and financial network should be accelerated; action must not be delayed by months of haggling at the U.N. Security Council. More should be done, now, to facilitate Iranian use of the Internet for uncensored communication. The State Department continues to drag its feet on using money appropriated by Congress to fund firewall-busting operations and to deny support to groups with a proven record of success, like the Global Internet Freedom Consortium.

The administration has worried excessively that open U.S. support might damage the Green Movement. Now President Obama has publicly taken sides, and the battle inside Iran has reached a critical juncture. It’s time for the United States to do whatever it can, in public and covertly, to help those Iranians fighting for freedom.
This is  a good editorial – worth reading entirely. But I disagree with one word in it – "It’s time for the United States to do whatever it can, in public and covertly, to help those Iranians fighting for freedom." I think our covert karma hasn’t been working so well. Let’s keep our cards on the table this time. All our covert efforts do is make other people [justifiably] paranoid and feed their propaganda machine…
Iran accuses West of fomenting violent protests
By ASSOCIATED PRESS
TEHERAN, Iran
Dec 29, 2009

Iran is accusing Western countries of fomenting this week’s violent protests in the capital and says it is summoning Britain’s ambassador to file a complaint. In Teheran on Tuesday, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said the deadly clashes were the work of a tiny minority.

He accused outside countries, including the US and Britain, of "miscalculating" by siding with anti-government protesters. He did not directly address US President Barack Obama‘s praise of the reformist movement.
Mickey @ 7:00 AM

scowling faces…

Posted on Monday 28 December 2009


Iran: Protest that refuses to die
The Guardian

29 December 2009

It is fruitless to speculate whether a tipping point has been achieved by Iran’s burgeoning opposition movement. But after the weekend’s protest marches in which at least eight people and probably many more died, we do know that the movement is both exceptionally resilient and spreading. What started out as a loose-knit coalition of reformist groups led by defeated opposition candidates protesting rampant fraud in the presidential election is becoming bolder, more focused and angrier by the week. Many protesters on the streets of Tehran on Sunday did not even cover their faces in the videos uploaded to YouTube, as they did in the post-election protests six months ago. The crowds displayed great bravery, refusing to retreat under police baton charges and volleys of warning shots. The other feature of the internet clips was the scenes of policemen either being overwhelmed or giving up and walking away. The protest is also going national. Opposition websites reported clashes in Qom and seven other cities in central, northern and eastern Iran. None of this seems likely to melt away.

If the protesters are getting bolder, there is, however, little sense that the Revolutionary Guards, loyal to the supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, are losing their grip. Yesterday they arrested at least 10 leading opposition figures, three of them advisers to the opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi. The day before, they killed his nephew. According to one opposition website, Ali Habibi Mousavi was run over by a sports utility vehicle outside his home and then shot dead by its five occupants. Faced with a choice of trying to cut deals with the opposition and crushing it, hardline supporters of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad know only one path – further repression. The next step would be to arrest Mir Hossein Mousavi and another opposition leader, Mehdi Karroubi. Iran’s intelligence ministry said yesterday that members of an exiled opposition group, the Mujahideen Khalq Organisation, were among those arrested, and it is not hard to see where those arrests are leading. At least one cleric yesterday portrayed the clashes during the Ashura religious festival as the work of foreign governments.

Caught between trying not to appear as the opposition’s backers and not abandoning them either, the US national security council spokesman Mike Hammer reminded the regime that it was fighting its own civilians seeking to exercise their universal rights, not the might of foreign powers. But the US is surely right not to do anything more at this stage than to issue statements. Thus far the Iranian regime is doing a good job of discrediting itself with its people. It does not need any assistance from abroad to do that. In the immediate aftermath of the rigged presidential election, Ayatollah Khamenei made a huge strategic mistake of supporting President Ahmadinejad and the bloody crackdown which ensued, shedding his role as the supreme arbiter and descending to the level of the government thugs on the street…

So far the regime has been able to control events using the Basij militiamen and the Revolutionary Guards, but there are 15 more national religious holidays to come, each one a focus for further protest. It is a question of who cracks first, and there are no indications of either side backing down.
It’s funny returning from my first ever visit to Muslim countries and the Middle East. It’s the only news that really interests me right now. I’m certainly no pundit after being a tourist for three weeks, but the trip added faces to the news and, for the moment, it’s where my head points [a head recovering from a bad cold and jet lag]. I was looking through the you tube videos from this weekend and came across some that showed the ‘party line.’ It was someone from the university who explained that foreign media backed by the US and UK goverments were fomenting unrest and that the demonstrators killed people themselves for drama. It reminded me of PRAVDA circa 1960-something. It set me thinking about the 1979 Iranian Revolution:
The Iranian Revolution (Also known as the Islamic Revolution or 1979 Islamic Revolution, Persian: انقلاب اسلامی, Enghelābe Eslāmi) refers to events involving the overthrow of Iran’s monarchy under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and its replacement with an Islamic republic under Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the revolution. It has been called an event that "made Islamic fundamentalism a political force … from Morocco to Malaysia."

The first major demonstrations against the Shah began in January 1978. Between August and December 1978 strikes and demonstrations paralyzed the country. The Shah left Iran for exile in mid-January 1979, and two weeks later Ayatollah Khomeini returned to Tehran to a greeting by several million Iranians. The royal regime collapsed shortly after on February 11 when guerrillas and rebel troops overwhelmed troops loyal to the Shah in armed street fighting. Iran voted by national referendum to become an Islamic Republic on April 1, 1979, and to approve a new theocratic constitution whereby Khomeini became Supreme Leader of the country, in December 1979.

The revolution was unusual for the surprise it created throughout the world: it lacked many of the customary causes of revolution (defeat at war, a financial crisis, peasant rebellion, or disgruntled military); produced profound change at great speed; was massively popular; overthrew a regime heavily protected by a lavishly financed army and security services; and replaced a modernising monarchy with a theocracy based on Guardianship of the Islamic Jurists (or velayat-e faqih). Its outcome — an Islamic Republic "under the guidance of an 80-year-old exiled religious scholar from Qom" — was, as one scholar put it, "clearly an occurrence that had to be explained."

Not so unique but more intense is the dispute over the revolution’s results. For some it was an era of heroism and sacrifice that brought forth nothing less than the nucleus of a world Islamic state — "a perfect model of splendid, humane, and divine life… for all the peoples of the world." On the other hand, some Iranians now believe that the revolution was a time when "for a few years we all lost our minds", and which "promised us heaven, but… created a hell on earth."
It is similar to the Communist Revolution in Russia in that it was driven by Ideology [Theocratic Islam]. The Shah was painted as an American puppet [which I presume was somewhat true]. And like the Communist Revolution, it was Utopian. At the time, I was in training and not paying attention. What I most remember is Khomeini’s scowling face and the hostage crisis that finished off Jimmy Carter and helped usher in Ronald Reagan. Next door neighbor, Saddam Hussein, invaded and they went at it [Iraq/Iran] for eight years [we supported Iraq mostly]. I think everyone was glad to have them fighting each other and staying out of our hair.

It’s interesting how ideology driven government take-overs always seem to deteriorate into repressive power-driven regimes that are devoid of the ideology that created them. Russia had a Stalin, Germany had a Hitler, Iran had a Khomeini and now an Ahmadinejad. The notion of Iran being directed by Islamic principles is absurd. It’s just about consolidating power and suppressing dissent.

I don’t think we can have much of a role in this drama for several reasons. First, we’ve not done very well in the Middle East lately. Our currency there is weak. But more than that, we are not the  ‘world cops’ we tried to be in the first decade of this century. Of course we care about how it comes out – nuclear weapons, oil, stability in the Middle East. But it’s not for us to say how the Iranians run their country. We have an ideology too and it may not fit their circumstances.

Speaking of ideology and scowling faces, there’s this:

John Bolton, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations under the Bush administration, said the United States and its allies should do more than offer words of support – in order to strive toward the ultimate goal of regime change.

"I think the international community needs to do more than just give rhetorical support to the opposition," Bolton told Fox News. "I think we need to give them tangible support. … I wish we had done more over the last 10 years — finance, communications, possibly other kinds of support."

Bolton said the persistent and recurring anti-government protests demonstrate how "profoundly unpopular" the regime is in Iran, but said that’s no guarantee the regime will crumble. "If you look at the regime’s willingness to use force, there’s no indication that they’ve begun to fragment," Bolton said…

But last week, Bolton said:

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad yesterday rejected a year-end deadline set by the Obama administration to agree to a U.N.- sponsored proposal for Iran to ship its low-grade uranium abroad for further processing.

On Fox News today, John Bolton — who has wanted nothing short of a military strike on Iran for years — dismissed any talk of sanctions and lamented that if Israel “take[s] a pass” on attacking Iran, then “Iran gets nuclear weapons.” When host Trace Gallagher wondered if attacking Iran might cause the opposition there to coalesce around the regime, Bolton said that wouldn’t be a problem because all that would be needed is an accompanying public diplomacy campaign:
    BOLTON: I don’t agree with that, if handled properly. … I think a careful campaign of public diplomacy in the wake of a military strike could explain to the people of Iran who are knowledgeable and sophisticated, that the attack is not aimed against them, it’s aimed against this regime that they dislike so much.
Unfortunately, this kind of public diplomacy campaign didn’t work out so well coinciding with the U.S. war in Iraq. Indeed, just before the invasion, President Bush addressed the Iraqi people, saying the war “will be directed against the lawless men who rule your country and not against you. … We will tear down the apparatus of terror and we will help you to build a new Iraq that is prosperous and free.”

And while Bolton has routinely ignored questions of how military action will “play out” in Iran and the region, the consequences are real and sobering.

The Carnegie Endowment’s Karim Sadjadpour — an actual Iran expert, not just some war-hawk flack like Bolton — has said that any use of force would all but kill the Iranian opposition movement. “Khamenei and Ahmadinejad would actually welcome a military strike,” he said, adding that “it may be their only hope to silence popular dissent and heal internal political rifts.”
Unbelievable! John Bolton has been talking about regime change and bombing Iran for over a decade – no matter what the circumstances. I can think of nothing to say about him anymore. I still think my theory about him is the most explanatory – that he asked an Iranian girl for a date when he was in high school, and she turned him down. It’s the only thing this side of a brain trumor that would explain his perseveration on bombing Iran.

Can you imagine bombing Iran, and then starting a careful campaign of public diplomacy in the wake of a military strike [that] could explain to the people of Iran who are knowledgeable and sophisticated, that the attack is not aimed against them? We are at war with two of Iran’s immediate neighbors, and now we’re bombing them, then Bolton suggests saying to the mythical people of Iran who are knowledgeable and sophisticated, "Listen guys, we’re not after your country and oil, we just want to help you."

It’s called a Pincer Movement, and it was used by Hannibal in the Battle of Cannae in 216 BC and later against the Iranians’ ancestors by Khalid ibn al-Walid at the Battle of Walaja in 633 AD. It’s older than Islam! I expect that the people of Iran who are knowledgeable and sophisticated have already noticed what Bush/Cheney/Bolton were up to. So I would suggest that Ahmadinejad’s nuclear program is as much a response to our threat as its cause. If Iran invaded Canada and Mexico, I expect we’d crank up our military too.

We voted our lunatics out of the White House, so the Iranians tried it too, but got snookered by a corrupt election like we did in 2000. They’re mad about it, and doing the right thing. More power to them…
Mickey @ 11:32 PM

iran…

Posted on Monday 28 December 2009

Iran Roiled, Crowds Burn Banks, Police Station Chanting against Theocrat Khamenei But No Revolutionary Alternative Yet
Informed Comment
Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion
by Juan Cole
Monday, December 28, 2009

The BBC is reporting that clashes are continuing into Monday morning between protesters and the regime security forces in Tehran and perhaps other cities, marking the first decisive failure of the basij paramilitary to control the streets by early morning of the day of a big demonstration. The number of protesters allegedly killed by security men rose to 9, with dozens wounded and 300 persons allegedly arrested. This video is allegedly from Monday morning and shows protesters freeing others taken prisoner in a basij van:

The chanting on Sunday turned against Ayatollah Ali Khamenei himself, not just against President Ahmadinejad. He was castigated as the Dictator and as worse than the old shah, and the very ideological basis of the regime, the doctrine of clerical rule, was chanted against in the streets. The legitimacy of the regime, profoundly shaken by the events since early June’s presidential election, is now being shredded further.

Another remarkable dimension of Sunday’s events was the sheer number of cities where significant rallies and clashes occurred. Some of those allegedly killed are said to have fallen in Tabriz, a northwestern metropolis near Turkey. Even conservative cities such as Isfahan and Mashhad joined in. Shiraz, Ardabil, the list goes on. The attempt of some analysts to paint the disturbances as a shi-shi North Tehran thing has clearly foundered.

The most ominous sign of all for the regime is the reports of security men refusing orders to fire into the crowd…
Any westerner who attempts to understand Islamic controversy and divisions is doomed to failure. It’s just too complicated. It’s better to say what you don’t understand the most and leave it at that. On the top of my don’t understand list are two questions:
  1. In Islam, Mohamed was not the only Prophet, he was the last Prophet. If the Prophets only speak the truth, why did God [Allah] need to send multiple Prophets? Because the translators of the earlier Prophets corrupted their words. Thus, Islam focuses on preventing false translations of the Quran [holy book] and Hadith [narratives of the Prophet’s life]. Mohamed was illiterate so his teachings were, by definition, written down by others [translation?]. And they have all kind of scholarship focused on correct translation? Very confusing to me…
  2. There are two major Islamic Sects: Sunni and Shia. They split in the early days of Islam around the issue of succession – who would lead after Mohamed died? The gist of things is that Ali, first cousin of Mohamed and married to Mohamed’s daughter was not chosen as the first leader though many suggested he was picked by Mohamed. His son, Husayn ibn Ali [Hussein], was martyred on the 10th of Muharram, AH 61 (October 10, 680), in Karbala, Iraq. The event led to the split between the Sunni and Shia sects of Islam, and it is of central importance in Shia Islam who follow Ali. I have no understanding at all of why succession became such a big deal.
Whatever the case, the holy day, Ashura [literally 10], comes on the 10th day of the Muslim New Year [which is now] and is a day of fasting and public mourning for the Martyr, Husayn, often celebrated in Shiite countries by self flagellation and bleeding. As Iran is the Major Shiite country, it is a big deal there.

When we were in Egypt and also in Jordan, I was surprised that bringing up Shiites was met with frowns and reassurances that neither country had very many of them, and that they were ostracized. I hadn’t realized that it was such a hostile division. It wasn’t because we were Americans – bin Laden is a Sunni. It felt like a real hostility. It reminded me of how some southern Protestants used to bristle at the mention of Catholicism when I was a kid. I recall several occasions when the mothers of friends would question me [I think because of my Italian name] and seemed relieved when I wasn’t Catholic. This reaction to the Shia reminded me of that. The only thing I learned is that the Shia call to prayer is different. The call There is one God, Allah, and his last Prophet is Mohamed is lengthened with something like and and Ali was his beloved.

At last, I get to my point. The martyrdom of Husayn was seen as a clash between good and evil. Husayn was killed on a journey to fight oppression by a false leader. The rememberance is something like the Christian Penetentes or Flagellants who beat themselves to remember Jesus’ persecution. The fact that the riots and anti-government demonstrations all over Iran have broken out on Ashura seems very significant to me. It says to me that many Iranians see the current leaders [Ayatollah Khamenei and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad] as false leaders. It suggests that their only source of power is military [secular] rather than from God. In addition, Ahmadinejad’s rival Mir Hussein Moussavi’s nephew, Ali Moussavi, has been reported killed in the riots. This parallel to Ashura [the martyrdom of younger family member] is downright eerie and is sure to be picked up by the opposition [a second Martyr, after Neda]. Then there’s this:
Police Are Said to Have Killed 10 in Iran Protests
New York Times
By ROBERT F. WORTH and NAZILA FATHI
December 27, 2009

Unlike the other protesters reported killed on Sunday, Ali Moussavi appears to have been assassinated in a political gesture aimed at his uncle, according to Mohsen Makhmalbaf, an opposition figure based in Paris with close ties to the Moussavi family.

Mr. Moussavi was first run over by a sport utility vehicle outside his home, Mr. Makhmalbaf wrote on his Web site. Five men then emerged from the car, and one of them shot Mr. Moussavi. Government officials took the body late Sunday and warned the family not to hold a funeral, Mr. Makhmalbaf wrote.
and this:

I don’t really understand the internal conflict in Iran. We don’t like Ahmadinejad because he’s seeming to want nuclear weapons and hates us. But I’m not sure why the Iranians themselves wanted to vote him down. But he probably "fixed" the election, and so now even some of his supporters are turning against him. If we’ve learned anything in the last 30 years, it’s that when Muslims engage in a cause with Allah on their side, a holy war of sorts, they are a powerful force to be reckoned with. The current Iranian government is in some deep, deep trouble right now.

Since we got back, I have been trying to understand Islam and the Middle East better – particularly the 20th century part. I’m nowhere near clear about any of it, but I have a few pieces that seem to be clearer than others. The history of the spread of Islam a mixture of conquest and holy war. And it’s impossible to separate the two. The Muslim countries are theocratic, even when they’re not. When the Ottoman Empire was ended at the end of the first World War, Arab countries were divided by the League of Nations under "Mandates." So Egypt and Jordan, for example, had Kings, but were under England in some way. After World War II, the U.N. formed Israel and the Mandates were lifted. Since then, there have been a series of wars, revolutions, and coups that shaped the current map of the Middle East.

At last, I get to my other point. The Arab world has plenty of reason to resent foreign meddling in their affairs [likewise, there have been plenty of reasons for people to meddle in their affairs]. George Bush, Dick Cheney, and John Bolton seemed determined to try to shape the future of Iran [with their favorite methodology – bombs] just like they tried to create an Iraq in their own image. Obama seems to have more sense about them – sort of a walk softly but carry a big stick approach. The Arab people are smart cookies living in a harsh part of the world strapped with a more than confusing history. While they are a dangerous lot [Iran Hostage Crisis, 9/11, al Qaeda, PLO, Hamas, Hezbolla], it seems to me that our old policy towards the Communist Bloc [containment] is exactly what we need to do right now. The "Bush Doctrine" and Cheney’s "American Exceptionalism" were ill-conceived and total flops [worse than that even]. The people on the streets of Iran are going to prevail sooner or later. It’s just the way things work.

Should we help them? God only knows…

Postscript: If I think containment is right, why am I conflicted about helping the Iranian protesters? I’m haunted by a story I heard from a woman in Budapest several years ago. In 1956 [when she was a child], the Hungarians revolted in the streets and threw out the Communists. Within a few days, a convoy of tanks arrived from Russia and retook the Country. The leaders of the revolt were killed, and it was 30+ years before the Hungarians became free. She said, "We thought if we rebelled on our own, the U.S. or the U.N. would come to save us. No one ever came."
Mickey @ 6:30 AM

iraq/jordan…

Posted on Sunday 27 December 2009

I think we learned something about the impact of our Iraq misadventure while we visited Jordan. The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan’s modern history couldn’t be more complicated, having contained Iraq, Syria, the West Bank, and parts of Saudi Arabia at one time or another in the last fifty years. When we invaded Iraq, many upper class Iraqis fled to Jordan [holding Jordanian Passports from their previous Jordanian citizenship]. This massive infusion of moneyed Iraqis caused a surge in real estate prices, a housing bubble, that caused an economic crisis in the country [good for business, bad for people]. As the war continued, the savings of the Iraqis began to run out and they entered the job market – further exacerbating the economic downturn and resulting in high unemployment in Jordan. I didn’t understand all I heard, but I got the point that this infusion of Iraqis who are becoming permanent residents has displaced a lot of Jordanians. Unemployment reported is at 12+% but is apparently actually near 25% among native Jordanians [who were already competing with guest-workers mostly from Egypt]. Meanwhile, Iraq is losing a large segment of its business class as the war drags on and they settle into Jordan. Just another piece of the mess created by our invasion of Iraq.
Mickey @ 4:59 PM

islam…

Posted on Sunday 27 December 2009

Standing on Mount Nebo in Jordan where Moses first saw the "Promised Land" on the other bank of the River Jordan and Dead Sea, I could make barely out Jerusalem in the distant hills with Jericho in between. It was monotonous desert to the horizon. A few days before, we had flown from Cairo to Amman Jordan. From the air, we saw Egypt, the Sinai Peninsula, Israel, Jordan, the West Bank, Syria – small places by any standard, mostly desert, with a only a few slivers of green along the rivers – the Nile and the River Jordan. I had trouble getting my mind around the fact that this was where the great western religions were born, where rivers of blood have been spilled for thousands of years, as people fought to possess the barren land around the Dead Sea – the lowest point on earth. It felt too big to fit the stark terrain – the history, the wars, the religions. I know I’m not the first person to visit the Middle East who felt dwarfed by all the visible history from these great civilizations all piled on top of each other in the few habitable regions of that vast desert. Later, we’d see another amazing site – the city of Petra hidden in a faultline in a mountain in Jordan. As if the monuments of the Pharaohs, Greeks, Romans, and early Christians weren’t enough, Petra was from yet another civilization I’d never even heard of – the Nabataeans.

 

But now it’s the culture of the Ottoman Turks who spread Islam  over the whole region that overrides that of the builders of these ancient monuments. There’s still a powerful religious coloring to life in these countries. It’s just a different religion. Egypt is 80% Sunni Muslim and 20% Christian. In Jordan, it’s more like 95%/5%. The call to prayer blares from speakers on the multiple Minarets five times a day. Often, they are saying different things, in different keys, out of sync with each other. So it sounds like an atonal symphony in a bad dream. The majority of women are scarfed with arms and legs covered. A small minority of women wear all black – robes, gloves, veils, and scarves. On the other end of the spectrum are colorful scarves, tight sweaters, tighter jeans, and high heel boots. There’s a wide variance in between. Men and women show no affection when walking together, though male friends and female friends often walk arm-in-arm.

In everyday conversation, religious phrasing is the rule. Any future event is followed by in shah Allah [God willing]. Any past event that turned out right gets a "Thank goodness" [thanks be to God]. All things are in Allah’s hands, and require thanks and acknowledgment. In a public school we visited, in Egypt, the library shelf was over half filled with copies of the Quran and the Sadith [stories of the Prophet]. There are courses in Islam three days a week [non-Muslims are excused from these classes on request]. For obvious reasons, when they spoke to us, there was frequent mention that Terrorists were "Extremists" who perverted the teachings of Mohamed, often backed up with quotes or stories from the various texts.

While these are secular countries, the religious teaching informs the laws in a variety of ways. In some areas, judgment is harsh. Drug dealers are hanged. So are most murderers, except in cases of honor killings – a family who murders a daughter for having sex outside of marriage – or a husband who kills his adulterous wife and her lover. Such people get light sentences. Other laws come from the Quran directly. You can be imprisoned for not taking care of elderly parents, for example. It’s all pretty foreign to the western ear. There are liquor stores near the hotels, but alcohol is forbidden in Muslim life. There are no homeless people, but plenty of poverty [in Egypt]. Unfortunate people are taken in somewhere, somehow. Health Care is free for the poor [but better if you’re insured]. No one presents as a thug so there’s no "street look." The pick-pockets and petty thieves are treated harshly under the law. Policemen are all over the place, often armed with Uzis or automatic pistols, particularly the "tourist and antiquities" police.

It’s all very foreign to us, so we ask questions, primarily about the place of women in their society and about "Terrorism." They know what questions Americans ask, and seem amused by them. In spite of the obvious differences in the place of men and women in their society, they laugh off our questions about equality – men and women alike. The women explain the head covering as a choice. They speak proudly of the equality in education for men and women. For example, the manager of our Nile boat introduced his staff, and was proud to tell us that he had one "girl" among the crew of 70+.

One encounter stood out to me. Part of our tour was a home visit in each country. In Jordan, we were in "high cotton" – a beautiful apartment that seemed to be made of marble and was beautifully appointed. The man of the house was a distinguished and traveled stock broker. He was well spoken and answered all our questions with glowing descriptions of the Jordanian system. His daughter, an electronic engineer who works for Oracle joined us – 24, living at home. They fielded the most challenging of questions with great facility. He was a proud man, humble in the Muslim way, but very sure of himself. Somehow, he got to talking about the Crusades and pointed out that the Christian Crusaders were ingenuous. "It wasn’t about religion. It was greed and conquest." [I found myself thinking about Bush’s invasion of Iraq]. He went on. "On the first day, the Crusaders killed 70,000 in Jerusalem. The streets ran with blood up to the horses knees." Well, I sure didn’t know that. Later he was talking about the  wonders of the Quran. "There’s a chapter that tells of the moon being two pieces that came together. Recently, scientists have confirmed that there’s a rift on the moon where the pieces joined." Later "There’s a chapter in the Quran that tells us that iron comes to earth in the rain. Recently, scientists have confirmed that rainwater contains traces of iron, just as the Prophet said." His knowing smile was a bit hard to return [this time, I was thinking about the Creation Museum in Kentucky].

But my point is that this very eloquent man, an obvious high roller, got onto these topics [the Crusades, the Moon, the iron in the water] all by himself with no prompting on our part. He was neither a kook nor an extremist. He was obviously quoting things from his Quran-study classes. Interestingly, his wife and daughter left the room when he began to hit such topics, particularly when he talked of total equality between the sexes. His wife nodded approvingly but seemed to roll her eyes. This kind of reference to the Quran came up frequently everywhere. And everyone we asked went out of their way to assure us that Terrorism was not real Islam, usually with stories from Mohamed’s teachings.

I was impressed with the genuine piety of the Muslim world, and pleasantly surprised with the general morality and friendliness of the people. I believe that the religion and its founder preach a genuine kindness and compassion. There is a refreshing tolerance of others and of other religions. But through it all, there is a self-righteousness and a sense of absolute rightness that reminded me of the of our American Christian Fundamentalists. And I’m completely sure that I could visit a cave in Pakistan and would hear the same message of kindness and piety from Osama bin Laden, and then hear passages from the Quran quoted that explained suicide bombings and what we call Terrorism as acts of the highest morality, followed by that same knowing smile. So to my way of thinking, Islam is more than religion. It’s a total view of all aspects of life, and its pious followers are vulnerable to the whims of characters like bin Laden or the Ottomans who conquered  the Roman Empire. If a man who was as smart and as educated as our host could believe that the moon fused from two parts and that iron comes from the rain because "it is written in the Quran," then less informed people could believe almost anything. But my feelings were little different from how I feel about the rationalizations of many Fundamentalist American Christians.

I don’t know that the trip deepened my understanding of Islam, or history, or the Arab world, or 911. But, like other trips to far off lands, it demystified a lot. The Middle East is just a place full of people that are little different from the people down the road here in North Georgia. They do a lot of things differently, but the similarities way overwhelm the differences. For them, their great antiquities are simply a backdrop, much like the beautiful Appalachian mountains are for us – a part of the daily scenery that’s rarely consciously registered. And I actually felt that they spend their lives a lot closer to God than many religious people here.

Postscript: I had the nagging feeling that they understood 911 better than they admitted. Surely they knew that we were suspicious of their simply discounting al Qaeda as "extremists." Our Jordan guide addressed that once. He said that he knew Americans wondered why moderate Muslims did not denounce al Qaeda, or join in the fight to eradicate it. He said he thought they were afraid of retaliation from al Qaeda. Frankly, I didn’t buy that either. I think it was like the South I grew up in. While most southerners didn’t approve of the bombings, or lynchings, or other violence, the violent White Supremists were expressing something that was a piece of the minds of many southerners. And the modern antiabortionists may deny advocating the violence that lead to bombings and murders, but those "extremists" were expressing a widely held sentiment nonetheless. Likewise, I expect that many Muslim Arabs resent the intrusion of Westerners into the Middle East – things like Cheney’s "American Exceptionalism." So while they might be genuine in condemning the Terrorists, I expect they were complicit with the notion that we needed to be taken down a notch or two.
Mickey @ 1:36 PM

home again…

Posted on Saturday 26 December 2009

Well got back from Egypt and Jordan at 11:55 PM last night – 5 minutes of Christmas at home. An amazing journey, to be sure, and I’m sure I’ll post a sampling of the infinite photo archive in my wife’s Nikon. But this morning, savoring the first cup of real coffee in three weeks, I awoke thinking about some impressions from the first days of the trip.

There’s something there called American Coffee. The way it’s made is to put some instant Nescafe in a cup or pot, then to steam it with an Expresso Machine and serve it with hot milk and a generous supply of sugar [which they add – package after package]. I do understand why they add a lot of sugar. It makes it almost drinkable. But to my way of thinking, coffee that has to be turned into syrup and which has a slightly gray coloring doesn’t suit. For any Middle Easterners reading this, here’s how it’s done. American coffee is brewed in something called Mr. Coffee [in our case using chicory coffee from Louisiana]. It is served with whole milk, lightly sweetened, and is a rich brown color. Grayness is a sign that it’s time to brew a new pot. Most [uninitiated] Americans don’t use the chicory [we do have a diverse culture.]. The cup sitting before me is delicious. It has that feeling you have when you visit your home town after a long absence and are flooded with memories you didn’t even know were there to be felt – a continuous history of morning reflections spread from the dawn of personal time. It took me days to settle for a morning caffeine boost from gray syrup. It was like using a Macintosh computer – it got the job done, but …

Unlike the free-wheeling days of our youth when we just went places, when we leave the States we go with tour groups. It’s safe, convenient, and cheap. I admit to liking having the details handled by someone else. It’s not so adventurous, but in places like China, Peru, Africa, or the Middle East, there’s adventure enough without the danger that would accompany any alternative. So early in any such trip, there’s the added piece of getting to know a tour guide and the fellow travelers, most of whom are retired people [from a particular subsegment of elder America that lives in something called retirement communities]. They introduce themselves with two places of origin – one where they lived as adults, and the other where they live now. "We live outside Phoenix, but we’re from Long Island." And a lot of them have traveled a lot, so the conversation drifts quickly to former trips.

On this trip, the opening conversations usually contained something that identified the shared Republican-ness of couples. My wife and I don’t fit that moniker from a hundred feet, so it took us longer to be included in the "getting to know you" communion of tour groups. The first break was a couple from South Georgia – a retired High School Principal and his wife. Delightful folks who surprisingly said, "Give the guy a chance" [referring to Obama]. "I’m doing a lot better than I did with that other guy." Then there was a couple from New Orleans who also didn’t have that Republican look. One night at dinner on the Nile Cruise, we found ourselves at a big table with people we hadn’t yet met. It was as if the Democrats, Obama supporters, had figured who was who by then and been magnetically drawn to this large round table to get relief from avoiding politics – and we had a fine time together bemoaning the Bush years. Interestingly, after the first week, this silly division of people disappeared and we all settled into the shared role of fellow travelers.

Another first impression – Cairo. Three things seem to part of a unified whole – population density, traffic, and smog. Prior to this trip, Mexico City and Beijing were vying for first place in my experience. But Cairo wins in all three hands down. The city is flat and covered with box-like high rises that are all sand and concrete colored, dirty, packed together, and monotonously constructed. They build concrete frameworks with floors and corners, then fill in the holes with bricks. Unoccupied apartments have nothing but holes for windows and are unfinished inside. The tops of the buildings are also unfinished and still have rebar sticking out [for the next floor]. They sprawl upwards. Apparently, unfinished buildings aren’t taxed, so they never finish them. All roofs are covered with Satellite Dishes in various state of rust, all pointing to the same imaginary point in the sky. The only break in the scene are frequent Minarets with speakers that go off more or less at the same time five times a day [starting before daybreak]. The reason we know about the tops of buildings is that the major thoroughfares are elevated [to make more room below].  So the oldest civilization on the planet still looks like it’s  "under construction." And as for traffic. Unequaled. All cars have small dents along the edges – testimony to the din of cars. One of our group commented on the relative absence of bicycles and motorcycles. The guide explained that it would be bad for health to ride in such things because of the smog – implying that cars are safer. While I doubt that cars have any safer air inside than out, the notion that riding cars to avoid the fumes from cars has a circularity that struck us all.

Just one other early impression. Egypt is 96% uninhabited and uninhabitable. Almost all 80 million Egyptians live within at most a few miles of the Nile River. It has no tributaries that I could see. The rains from Equatorial Africa feed the Nile that flows north to the Mediterranean and create a very thin place we call Egypt. Beyond its banks there’s nothing. Flying over the desert, one can see that the desert is covered with canyons and riverbeds that were dry long before the first pyramids were built over 4000 years ago. That ribbon of green delta around the Nile is where the people are – all except a few Bedouins.


ancient river beds                                                             the Nile delta      

Like almost all the places we’ve traveled, the first impressions are of differences. It was interesting to return to Cairo several times on the trip. By the third time [a long yesterday ago], it was just Cairo, and it looked like an old friend.
Mickey @ 10:33 AM

bravo…

Posted on Thursday 10 December 2009

We have the right President. The only real question, “Do we have the right country?”

Mickey @ 10:00 AM

jet lag…

Posted on Monday 7 December 2009

Jet lag is a real thing. We took turns having a mind today, maybe by tomorrow, we’ll have two again. Egypt has most of the antiquities, and most of those that can be moved are in the Cairo Museum where we spent much of the day. The famous mask of Tutenkhamen is just a piece of what was in the tomb when it was found. It and all the rest are in the cavernous museum [which itself is an antiquity in need of restoration]. The streets of Cairo are as interesting as the antiquities. Tight fitting designer jeans with Moslem headcoverings predominated. The men are arm and arm, but couples display little affection in public. The call to prayer blares from speakers periodically apparently replacing the imams in minarets. Best I could tell, it didn’t affect the people who continued on laughing and talking.

We learned many things about ancient Egypt, but there were modern things too. 25% of Egyptians live in Cairo [20,000,000]. The government is being moved out to decrease the population by 3 million or so. But Egyptians all live along the Nile, everything else is desert. So, they’re building "another Nile" to the West from Aswan north. That will increase their usable land from 4-5% to 25%. The plan is for another 8-9 Million people to move from Cairo to the "another Nile." Everyone is being moved from Luxor [where the Valley of the Kings is located], in part to preserve their antiquities. Apparently, the rank and file Egyptians have never lived in prosperity, even in antiquity. This massive re-engineering the Nile is seen as a step towards general prosperity for all Egyptians for the first time ever.

We passed a "demonstration" [attended by more riot police than demonstrators]. It was the telephone workers wanting higher wages. Our guide said [almost with pride], "this is something new – demonstrations. It’s the first step to democracy. You all know that democracy is a hard road." I guess I never thought about it that way, but it sounds good to me.

Tomorrow – the Pyramids [and maybe two minds!]…
Mickey @ 11:53 AM

egypt…

Posted on Sunday 6 December 2009

Well I can connect to the Internet from Cairo, but can’t seem to connect to FTP to upload pictures, so words will have to do. Cairo is a flat, sandstone colored place. Every building is painted the same color [or "was" – a lot are faded]. There are minerets dotting the horizon in all directions, There are 20,000,000 people living here so the traffic is terrible. – rush hour "7AM-Midnight." The freeways are elevated above the bustling streets so as to take up less room. Everything here so far is about too many people – the government and all employees are being moved out of the city to cut the population. But it seems safe and happy so far. We’re in the hotel and sleeping off the grueling trip…
Mickey @ 10:05 AM