{"id":10551,"date":"2011-06-22T21:10:05","date_gmt":"2011-06-23T01:10:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=10551"},"modified":"2011-06-23T05:57:32","modified_gmt":"2011-06-23T09:57:32","slug":"designated-author","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2011\/06\/22\/designated-author\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;designated author &#8220;&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<br \/>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><u><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Risperidone in the Treatment of Elderly Patients With Psychotic Disorders<\/font><\/strong><\/u><br \/>        <sup>by Madhusoodanan,  Subramoniam M.D.;  Brecher, Martin M.D., D.MS.c.;  Brenner, Ronald  M.D.;  Kasckow, John M.D.;  Kunik, Mark M.D.;  Negron, Arnaldo E. M.D.; and&nbsp;  Pomara, Nunzio M.D.<\/sup><br \/>        <strong><font color=\"#200020\">American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry<\/font><\/strong> 7:132-138, <strong><font color=\"#990000\">1999<\/font><\/strong>.<\/div>\n<p>       <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"><strong><sup>The authors evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of  risperidone in 103 elderly patients [mean age, 71 years] with  schizophrenia [75%] or schizoaffective disorder [25%]. Using the Extrapyramidal Symptoms Rating Scale [ESRS], Positive and Negative  Syndrome Scale [PANSS], and Clinical Global Impression [CGI] scale, they  conducted a prospective, open-label, 12-week trial in 14 psychiatric  centers in the United States. Patients&#8217; symptoms were assessed at  baseline and over a 12-week period. At endpoint, ESRS scores were  significantly reduced, as were PANSS total and subscale scores. There  were no clinically significant changes in electrocardiograms, laboratory  test results, or vital signs. Risperidone was well tolerated and  efficacious in elderly patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective  disorder.<\/sup><\/strong><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">Who knew that ghost-writing of medical journal articles was even a topic in 1999? I didn&#8217;t. But in the <strong><font color=\"#660033\">Rothman Report<\/font><\/strong> [<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2011\/06\/15\/detestable\/\" target=\"_blank\"><font color=\"#200020\">detestable&hellip;<\/font><\/a><\/strong>], we read <a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/rothman-report-43-65.pdf#page=8\" target=\"_blank\"><u><strong><font color=\"#200020\">this<\/font><\/strong><\/u><\/a>:<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"239\" border=\"0\" width=\"400\" vspace=\"5\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/ris-64-1.gif\" \/>&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">EM stands for <u><a href=\"http:\/\/www.excerptamedica.com\/?page=strategic_consultancy\" target=\"_blank\"><strong><font color=\"#990000\">Excerptia Medica<\/font><\/strong><\/a><\/u>:<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.excerptamedica.com\/?page=strategic_consultancy\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"301\" border=\"1\" width=\"500\" vspace=\"7\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/em-1.jpg\" \/><\/a>&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">Notice the amazing category, <strong><font color=\"#400040\">designated author<\/font><\/strong>. I guess that by 1999, the practice of a pharmaceutical company doing a study specifically oriented towards some marketing goal, having it written up by a medical communications firm like <strong><font><strong><font color=\"#990000\">Excerptia Medica<\/font><\/strong><\/font><\/strong>, then picking an author to legitimize the enterprise must&#8217;ve been pretty common. But I think most of us were oblivious:      <\/div>\n<div align=\"center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"403\" border=\"0\" width=\"400\" vspace=\"5\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/ris-64-2.gif\" \/><\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">On a lark, I put <strong><font color=\"#200020\">Dr. Subramoniam Madhusoodanan<\/font><\/strong>&#8216;s name into Google&reg; and found this:    <\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.springerlink.com\/content\/w1327j414375168u\/\"><u><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Efficacy and Tolerability of Olanzapine in Elderly Patients with Psychotic Disorders: A Prospective Study<\/font><\/strong><\/u><\/a><br \/>      <sup>by Subramoniam Madhusoodanan, Ronald Brenner, Padma Suresh, Nancy M. Concepcion, Cesar D. Florita, Geetha Menon, Amarjit Kaur, Giovanny Nunez and Harsha Reddy<\/sup><br \/>    <strong><font color=\"#200020\">Annals of Clinical Psychiatry<\/font><\/strong> 12:1-18, 2000.<\/div>\n<p>    <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"><strong><sup>Olanzapine is a novel antipsychotic effective in reducing positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia and with a safe side-effectpro\u00ef\u00ac\u0081le. Premarketing trials,however, included only a few elderly patients. Further data are needed regarding the effects of olanzapine in the elderly and those with comorbid medical illness. In this pilot study, 11 hospitalized patients (age range 60&ndash;85 years) who manifested symptoms of psychosis related to schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders were treated with olanzapine (dose range, 5&ndash;20 mg\/day). Ef\u00ef\u00ac\u0081cacy and safety were assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Calgary Depression Scale For Schizophrenia (CDSS), EKG, physical examination, and various laboratory tests.Seven patients responded to treatment and all of them showed improvement in both positive and negative symptoms, with greate rreduction in positive symptoms. Treatment was discontinued in 2 patients whose symptoms showed no improvement or worsened. The CGI showed signi\u00ef\u00ac\u0081cant improvement in 9 patients, remained the same in 1, and worsened in 1 patient. ESRS showed signi\u00ef\u00ac\u0081cant reduction from baseline to \u00ef\u00ac\u0081nal visit. Of the 10 patients who cooperated for MMSE, 9 had improved scores. The CDSS showed signi\u00ef\u00ac\u0081cant reduction in scores from baseline to \u00ef\u00ac\u0081nal visit. No signi\u00ef\u00ac\u0081cant changes were noted in laboratory tests, prolactin levels, EKG, and physical examination. Concomitant administration of lorazepam, carbamazepine, divalproex sodium, and lithium carbonate caused no adverse consequences. The reduction of positive and negative symptoms, lack of signi\u00ef\u00ac\u0081cant extrapyramidal symptoms and other side effects, and lack of any signi\u00ef\u00ac\u0081cant drug interaction suggest that olanzapine may be a safe and effective antipsychotic medication in the elderly.<\/sup><\/strong><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">This article had no conflict of interest declarations at all. But wait! there was more:<\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><u><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Experience with the Atypical Antipsychotics&mdash;Risperidone and Olanzapine in the Elderly<\/font><\/strong><\/u><br \/>   <sup>by Subramoniam Madhusoodanan, Padma Suresh, Ronald Brenner and Renuka Pillai<\/sup><br \/>    <strong><font color=\"#200020\">Annals of Clinical Psychiatry<\/font><\/strong> 11:131, 1999.   <\/div>\n<p>  <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"><sup><strong>There is paucity of  published data regarding controlled trials with risperidone and  olanzapine in elderly psychotic patients. Medical records of 151  hospitalized geropsychiatric patients (risperidone patients <em>n<\/em> = 114 and olanzapine patients <em>n<\/em>  = 37) were analyzed for demographic data, target symptoms, doses,  effects, side effects, comorbid medical conditions and concurrent  medications. The mean age of the patients was 71 years. The male: female  ratio was essentially the same for both groups. The mean daily dose was  3 mg for risperidone and 10 mg for olanzapine. 78% of the risperidone  group and 75% of the olanzapine group appear to have responded to  treatment. The discontinuation rates of medication was the same in both  groups (22%). Adverse events were reported in 16&ndash;17% in both groups. It  appears from this study that both risperidone and olanzapine are  relatively safe and effective in geropsychiatric patients with comorbid  medical illnesses. Controlled studies and head-to-head comparison  studies are recommended.<\/strong><\/sup><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">Another article with no conflict of interest declaration. This would be almost laughable if the stakes weren&#8217;t so high. <strong><font color=\"#990000\">Janssen<\/font><\/strong> [aided by <strong><font color=\"#990000\">Excerptia Medica<\/font><\/strong>] came on the scene with the new Atypical Antipsychotic, Risperdal, with a stealth campaign to sell the drug no matter what it took. In the TMAP project in Texas, they appear to have heavily influenced the State&#8217;s drug use policy in the public sector, and then moved into a number of other States. In this case, they&#8217;re trying to <strong><font color=\"#200020\">extend their indications into the elder-care market with a ghost-written article<\/font><\/strong> [one of many]. They picked a <strong><font color=\"#400040\">designated author<\/font><\/strong> who apparently was way more than available, a Dr. Subramoniam Madhusoodanan in New York. But the FDA didn&#8217;t buy it, thankfully. Not many years later, this warning was appended to all of the Atypical Antipsychotics:<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\"> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"167\" border=\"0\" width=\"400\" vspace=\"7\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/elderly.gif\" \/><\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">I read this material and write about it, but it still strikes me as surreal &#8211; that they would actually do this kind of stuff. What were they thinking?&#8230; <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Risperidone in the Treatment of Elderly Patients With Psychotic Disorders by Madhusoodanan, Subramoniam M.D.; Brecher, Martin M.D., D.MS.c.; Brenner, Ronald M.D.; Kasckow, John M.D.; Kunik, Mark M.D.; Negron, Arnaldo E. M.D.; and&nbsp; Pomara, Nunzio M.D. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 7:132-138, 1999. The authors evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of risperidone in 103 elderly [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10551","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10551","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10551"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10551\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41396,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10551\/revisions\/41396"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10551"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10551"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10551"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}