{"id":11057,"date":"2011-07-05T20:35:13","date_gmt":"2011-07-06T00:35:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=11057"},"modified":"2011-07-05T23:51:18","modified_gmt":"2011-07-06T03:51:18","slug":"watchful-waiting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2011\/07\/05\/watchful-waiting\/","title":{"rendered":"<em>watchful waiting<\/em>&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"justify\">I admitted up front that I&#8217;m an adult psychiatrist and have no real inside track on bipolar disorder in children from clinical experience. I also thought that the COBY study had enough Bipolar I cases to suggest to me that Bipolar Illness can begin in adolescence or even childhood [<strong><a target=\"_self\" href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2011\/06\/30\/bipolar-kids-coby-course-and-outcome-of-bipolar-youth\/\">bipolar kids: COBY [Course and Outcome of Bipolar Youth]&hellip;<\/a><\/strong>]. I also thought that their Bipolar NOS category was too thin and didn&#8217;t really think those kids belonged in the bipolar diagnostic category. But I remain curious, so I went looking for some studies I could trust. Here&#8217;s what I found:         <\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/21123313\"><u><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Severe mood dysregulation, irritability, and the diagnostic boundaries of bipolar disorder in youths<\/font><\/strong><\/u><\/a><br \/>                 <sup>by Leibenluft E.<\/sup><br \/>                  <strong><font color=\"#200020\">American Journal of Psychiatry<\/font><\/strong>. 2011 168(2):129-42.<\/div>\n<p>               <\/p>\n<div><strong>Abstract<\/strong><\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\"><sup><strong>In  recent years, increasing numbers of children have been diagnosed with  bipolar disorder. In some cases, children with unstable mood clearly  meet current diagnostic criteria for bipolar disorder, and in others,  the diagnosis is unclear. Severe mood dysregulation is a syndrome  defined to capture the symptomatology of children whose diagnostic  status with respect to bipolar disorder is uncertain, that is, those who  have severe, nonepisodic irritability and the hyperarousal symptoms  characteristic of mania but who lack the well-demarcated periods of  elevated or irritable mood characteristic of bipolar disorder. Levels of  impairment are comparable between youths with bipolar disorder and  those with severe mood dysregulation. An emerging literature compares  children with severe mood dysregulation and those with bipolar disorder  in longitudinal course, family history, and pathophysiology.  Longitudinal data in both clinical and community samples indicate that  nonepisodic irritability in youths is common and is associated with an  elevated risk for anxiety and unipolar depressive disorders, but not  bipolar disorder, in adulthood. Data also suggest that youths with  severe mood dysregulation have lower familial rates of bipolar disorder  than do those with bipolar disorder. While youths in both patient groups  have deficits in face emotion labeling and experience more frustration  than do normally developing children, the brain mechanisms mediating  these pathophysiologic abnormalities appear to differ between the two  patient groups. No specific treatment for severe mood dysregulation  currently exists, but verification of its identity as a syndrome  distinct from bipolar disorder by further research should include  treatment trials.<\/strong><\/sup><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/neuroscience.nih.gov\/lab.asp?Org_ID=457\"><u><strong><font color=\"#660033\">Dr.                          Leibenluft<\/font><\/strong><\/u><\/a> is Chief of the Section on Bipolar Spectrum Disorders                          in the Emotion and Development Branch,                          Mood                          and Anxiety Disorders Program, National Institute                          of Mental Health. I think her remarks are thoughtful and backed by&nbsp; science rather than simply opinion. But I have to admit, this quote from a <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/intramural.nimh.nih.gov\/research\/pubs\/leibenluft02.pdf\"><u><strong><font color=\"#200020\">recent article<\/font><\/strong><\/u><\/a> of hers goes a long way with me: &quot;<em>All authors report no competing interests<\/em>&quot;&#8230;<\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/18501566\" target=\"_blank\"><u><strong><font color=\"#200020\">ECNP consensus meeting. Bipolar depression. Nice, March 2007<\/font><\/strong><\/u><\/a><br \/>            <sup>by Goodwin GM, Anderson I, Arango C, Bowden CL, Henry C, Mitchell PB, Nolen WA, and Vieta E, Wittchen HU<\/sup><br \/>            <strong><font color=\"#200020\">European Neuropsychopharmacoly<\/font><\/strong> 2008 18(7):535-49.<\/div>\n<p>              <\/p>\n<div><strong>Abstract<\/strong><\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\"><sup><strong>&#8230;Bipolar I disorder is rare in prepubertal children, when  defined according to unmodified DSM-IV-TR criteria. A broad diagnosis of  bipolar disorder risks confounding with other childhood psychopathology  and has less predictive value for bipolar disorder in adulthood than  the conservative definition. Nevertheless, empirical studies of drug and  other treatments and longitudinal studies to assess validity of the  broadly defined phenotype in children and adolescents are desirable,  rather than extrapolation from adult bipolar practice. The need for an  increased capacity to conduct reliable trials in children and  adolescents is a challenge to Europe, whose healthcare system should  allow greater participation and collaboration than other regions, via  clinical networks. ECNP will aspire to facilitate such developments&#8230;<\/strong><\/sup><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">I liked this one because it said two thing that sounded right to me. First, using unmodified criteria, Bipolar I is rare but present in children. Second, they say that the new information needs to be repeated in a system that is not so contaminated as the American scene. Hear, Hear!      <\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC2751607\/?tool=pubmed\" target=\"_blank\"><u><font color=\"#200020\">Child Bipolar I Disorder<\/font><\/u><font color=\"#990000\"> [full text]<\/font><\/a><br \/>   <sup><font color=\"#200020\">Prospective Continuity With Adult Bipolar I Disorder; Characteristics of Second and Third Episodes; Predictors of 8-Year Outcome<\/font> <\/sup><\/strong>       <br \/>          <sup>by Barbara Geller, MD;  Rebecca Tillman, MS;  Kristine Bolhofner, BS;  and Betsy Zimerman, MA <\/sup><br \/>          <strong><font color=\"#200020\">Arch Gen Psychiatry<\/font><\/strong>. 2008 65(10):1125-1133.<\/div>\n<p>         <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"> <strong>Abstract<br \/>         <sup> <u>Context<\/u>: Child bipolar I disorder (BP-I) is a contentious diagnosis. <br \/>           <u>Objective<\/u>:&nbsp; To investigate continuity of child and adult BP-I and characteristics of later episodes.<br \/>           <u>Design<\/u>:&nbsp; Inception cohort longitudinal study. Prospective,blinded, controlled, consecutive new case ascertainment.<br \/>           <u>Setting<\/u>:&nbsp; University medical school research unit.<br \/>           <u>Subjects<\/u>:&nbsp; There were 115 children, enrolled from 1995 through1998, aged 11.1 (SD, 2.6) years with first episode <em>DSM-IV<\/em> BP-I, mixed or manic phase, with 1 or both cardinal symptoms (elation or grandiosity) and score of 60 or less on the Children&#8217;s Global Assessment Scale (CGAS). All <em>DSM-IV<\/em> severity and duration criteria were fulfilled. Separate interviews were conducted of parents about their children and of children about themselves.<br \/>           <u>Main Outcome Measures<\/u>:&nbsp; Washington University in St Louis Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (WASH-U-KSADS); Psychosocial Schedule for School Age Children&ndash;Revised; CGAS.<br \/>           <u>Results<\/u>: Retention was 93.9% (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;108) for completing assessments at every one of the 9 follow-up visits. Subjects spent 60.2% of weeks with any mood episodes and 39.6% of weeks with mania episodes, during 8-year follow-up. During follow-up,87.8% recovered from mania, but 73.3% relapsed to mania. Even accounting for family psychopathology, low maternal warmth predicted relapse to mania, and more weeks ill with manic episodes was predicted by low maternal warmth and younger baseline age. Largely similar to first episodes, second and third episodes of mania were characterized by psychosis, daily (ultradian) cycling,and long duration (55.2 and 40.0 weeks, respectively), but significantly shorter than first episodes. At 8-year follow-up, 54 subjects were 18.0 years or older. Among subjects 18.0 years or older,44.4% had manic episodes and 35.2% had substance use disorders.<br \/>           <u>Conclusions<\/u>:&nbsp; In grown-up subjects with child BP-I, the44.4% frequency of manic episodes was 13 to 44 times higher than population prevalences, strongly supporting continuity.The rate of substance use disorders in grown-up child BP-I was similar to that in adult BP-I.<\/sup><\/strong><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">This study is a follow-up on kids diagnosed before the bipolar mania that swept over us largely through the efforts of Dr. Biederman&#8217;s group and their corporate sponsors. I see that as a plus. This study also has the magic words, &quot;<em>All authors report no competing interests<\/em>.&quot; Finally, they&#8217;re looking at a real research question, &quot;<em>Do bipolar kids become bipolar adults?<\/em>&quot; Their answer? Yes, <em><strong>if diagnosed by standard criteria<\/strong><\/em>.<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">In case you haven&#8217;t figured it out, this post isn&#8217;t about childhood bipolar disorder, it&#8217;s about how to look at modern psychiatric literature. Thirty years ago, it never would&#8217;ve occurred to me to look first at who funded the study, then at the conflict of interest declarations, then who did the study or gave the opinion. But that&#8217;s the name of the game now. And, as we&#8217;ve seen with the Biederman story, or the Keller story, or the Nemeroff story, the old hallowed halls don&#8217;t count anymore &#8211; Harvard, Brown, Emory.<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"><a href=\"http:\/\/intramural.nimh.nih.gov\/research\/pubs\/leibenluft02.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"200\" hspace=\"4\" height=\"238\" border=\"0\" align=\"right\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/leib-1.gif\" \/><\/a>There are other things. This is from one of Dr. Leiberluft&#8217;s papers. Notice that she shows the raw data along with the mean and standard deviation. She&#8217;s not hiding behind massaged data. That&#8217;s a plus. Considering the number of dolled up graphs that hide rather than reveal the actual data, it&#8217;s a breath of fresh air to see one point for each subject. It makes the data look a lot more messy, but that&#8217;s the way science is &#8211; messy [click on the figure to see the whole study]. And when data is shown as a frequency as below from Geller&#8217;s study, it ought to make intuitive sense. The overwhelming majority of the cases had periodic illness [recovered] &#8211; the hallmark of bipolar disorder. Compare this graph to the Bipolar NOS data in the <a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2011\/06\/30\/bipolar-kids-coby-course-and-outcome-of-bipolar-youth\/\" target=\"_blank\"><u><strong>COBY<\/strong><\/u><\/a> study where many of the subjects obviously had a chronic problem &#8211; unlike bipolar illness.<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"450\" vspace=\"7\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/www.1boringoldman.com\/images\/cumul.gif\" \/><br \/> <sup><strong><font color=\"#990000\">[1st derivative added = approximate duration of episodes]<\/font><\/strong><br \/> <\/sup><\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">We shouldn&#8217;t have to approach our scientific literature in a paranoid way, with one eye cocked for deceit, but given the track record of the recent decades, that&#8217;s now become a responsibility based on reality. Right now, I think that the ball&#8217;s in their court. If a drug company pays for a study and\/or has financial ties with the authors, I would suggest looking around for other studies that are less compromised. Finding none, I&#8217;d wait until one comes along. There is no urgency in trying out new psychiatric medications, given the recent track record of pharmaceutical influence. If we&#8217;re going to learn something from the Biederman debacle, it&#8217;s the time honored medical principle of <em><strong>watchful waiting<\/strong><\/em> &#8211; when you&#8217;re unsure of what to do <u>and<\/u> there&#8217;s no life-threatening emergency, wait until things are clarified before acting. We don&#8217;t call the people we see &quot;patients&quot; without good reason&#8230;<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I admitted up front that I&#8217;m an adult psychiatrist and have no real inside track on bipolar disorder in children from clinical experience. I also thought that the COBY study had enough Bipolar I cases to suggest to me that Bipolar Illness can begin in adolescence or even childhood [bipolar kids: COBY [Course and Outcome [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11057","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11057","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11057"}],"version-history":[{"count":29,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11057\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11092,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11057\/revisions\/11092"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11057"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11057"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11057"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}