{"id":11292,"date":"2011-07-09T08:29:02","date_gmt":"2011-07-09T12:29:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=11292"},"modified":"2011-07-09T08:53:26","modified_gmt":"2011-07-09T12:53:26","slug":"idiopathic-behavior-disorder","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2011\/07\/09\/idiopathic-behavior-disorder\/","title":{"rendered":"idiopathic behavior disorder&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div align=\"justify\">I have finally tired of writing about Biederman as if he&#8217;s a force to reckon with. You know what I think about him and his science. You probably think something similar yourself. But I&#8217;m not tired of discussing <em>childhood bipolar illness au Biederman<\/em>. What <u>is<\/u> wrong with the kids that he wants to gather under his umbrella? If they don&#8217;t have Manic-Depressive Illness &#8211; at least the version we&#8217;ve known throughout the 20th century since Kraepelin convincingly argued it was a disease &#8211; what is wrong with them? I don&#8217;t think we know the answer. In his letter in the NEJM, Biederman says:<\/div>\n<ul>\n<div align=\"justify\"><strong><sup>They argue that &ldquo;no existing DSM [<em>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders<\/em>]  diagnosis conveys the appropriate severity&rdquo; of the moods and behaviors  of children &ldquo;who can be explosively angry, irritable, frantically  active, suicidal, or even homicidal.&rdquo; <font color=\"#990000\">An adult with these symptoms would  very likely be diagnosed with bipolar disorder<\/font>&#8230;<\/sup><\/strong><\/div>\n<\/ul>\n<div align=\"justify\">The hallmarks of Manic-Depressive Illness are an expansive and grandiose mood, psychomotor agitation, and <strong><font color=\"#200020\">periodicity<\/font><\/strong> &#8211; they are <em>that way<\/em> for a time, then they&#8217;re <em>normal<\/em>. Patients with the classic version usually have other periods when they have the opposite &#8211; psychomotor retardation and a depressed mood. So we&#8217;ve always used the synonyms <em>affective disorder<\/em> or <em>mood disorder<\/em> when talking about the illness, hypothesizing that the <em>mood<\/em> is primary.<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">But there are some other qualities. They take up too much space. When you&#8217;re in the room with a Manic person, that&#8217;s all there is. When I ran the emergency room at our City\/County hospital, the major source of our Manic patients was the airport. For one thing, Manic people are <em>on the move<\/em>. But once on the plane, they become loud, boisterous, disruptive, walk the aisles. Many times, planes added a stop in Atlanta to off-load such people, or turned around to bring them back.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Another example of their space occupying problems has to do with jails and civil commitment. In order to involuntarily confine a mental patient, there are two criteria &#8211; mental illness and dangerousness. You can&#8217;t deprive a person of their civil rights just for being mentally ill. They have to be imminently dangerous to <em>self <\/em>or<em> others<\/em>. With Manic patients, the first criteria is easy, but the second is much less clear. After a few years it gets easier because you&#8217;ve allowed Manic people to leave only to have them returned having been beaten to a pulp because they&#8217;ve wandered into a bar and agitated the wrong kind of people. New psychiatry residents don&#8217;t have a feel for that, so they send them back to jail where they&#8217;ve been incarcerated for causing disturbances. And if you&#8217;re in charge of the emergency room, you get a call at home from an experienced jailer who says, &quot;you&#8217;ve got a new resident on call tonight, right?&quot; And then you&#8217;re in a department store and run into that patient you saw in a full manic splendor last year, and they say, &quot;Hi doc,&quot; exchange a few niceties, and go on with their shopping &#8211; and you get it about periodicity.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">With the coming of the DSM-III and its progeny, a whole lot more patients fell into the pot &#8211; &quot;rapid cyclers,&quot; depressive people, bipolar II. A lot of the new arrivals didn&#8217;t have periodicity. They were always disturbed or frequently disturbed. I never totally bought their inclusion. They didn&#8217;t seem to fit clinically, didn&#8217;t have they same response to treatment, and I never ran into them in the store <em>normal<\/em>. I assumed they had something else, though I wouldn&#8217;t know how to describe them as a group. All I know is that they didn&#8217;t fit.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">What I&#8217;m getting at is Biederman&#8217;s comment, &quot;<strong><font color=\"#200020\">&#8230;who can be explosively angry, irritable, frantically  active, suicidal, or even homicidal.<\/font><\/strong>&quot;<strong><font color=\"#200020\"> An adult with these symptoms would  very likely be diagnosed with bipolar disorder<\/font><\/strong>&#8230;&quot; Not by me. Manic people can be &quot;<strong><font color=\"#200020\">explosively angry, irritable, frantically  active<\/font><\/strong>&quot; if you challenge their grandiosity or try to stop them, but that&#8217;s not their nascent state. So I&#8217;m wondering if Biederman is following the over-inclusive lead of the adult psychiatrists who came before him that [in my opinion] were way too loose with this diagnosis since being <em>Spitzer-ized <\/em>[<em>Wash-U-ized<\/em>] with the DSM-III. There is a classic Manic Depressive Illness. Then there&#8217;s a new extra-crispy bipolar disorder that&#8217;s only about thirty years old. I&#8217;m not impressed that expanding the diagnostic net for the adults has been much more successful than it has been with the kids.  <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">As with the overly inclusive Major Depressive Disorder, the modern Bipolar Disorder diagnoses have given the illusion that we know more than we actually&nbsp; know &#8211; and in the process obliterated the boundary of our understanding. They&#8217;ve redefined research as an endless regress of repetitive clinical drug trials that are little more than marketing for symptomatic treatments. Biederman cites &quot;<strong><font color=\"#200020\">Large-scale pediatric trials documenting safety and efficacy have led to Food and Drug Administration approval of two agents<\/font><\/strong>&quot; as meaningful. The FDA is just doing its job &#8211; saying that the drugs are safe and have a statistically demonstrable effect. The FDA is not charged with telling us what&#8217;s wrong with our patients or how to treat them. There&#8217;s a difference between a statistically demonstrable effect and <em>treatment<\/em>. And the FDA is certainly not certifying Biederman&#8217;s idiosyncratic views on diagnosis or treatment. I&#8217;m wondering if his real discovery is that the adults that got thrown into the bipolar pot had childhood problems too &#8211; at neither time being the problems Kraepelin was talking about. How about <strong><font color=\"#200020\">Idiopathic Behavior Disorder<\/font><\/strong>? At least we&#8217;d be admitting that we don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s wrong&#8230;<\/div>\n<ul>\n<div align=\"justify\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">id&middot;i&middot;o&middot;path&middot;ic<\/font><\/strong> [id-ee-uh-path-ik]<br \/> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&ndash;adj<br \/> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;of unknown cause, as a disease.<\/div>\n<\/ul>\n<div align=\"justify\">The most important starting place is knowing what we don&#8217;t know&#8230;<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I have finally tired of writing about Biederman as if he&#8217;s a force to reckon with. You know what I think about him and his science. You probably think something similar yourself. But I&#8217;m not tired of discussing childhood bipolar illness au Biederman. What is wrong with the kids that he wants to gather under [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11292","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11292","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11292"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11292\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11299,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11292\/revisions\/11299"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11292"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11292"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11292"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}