{"id":1139,"date":"2007-04-14T04:07:56","date_gmt":"2007-04-14T09:07:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2007\/04\/14\/steven-m-biskupic-and-georgia-thompson-wisconsin\/"},"modified":"2007-04-14T04:11:13","modified_gmt":"2007-04-14T09:11:13","slug":"steven-m-biskupic-and-georgia-thompson-wisconsin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2007\/04\/14\/steven-m-biskupic-and-georgia-thompson-wisconsin\/","title":{"rendered":"bottom line&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<br \/>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.realcities.com\/mld\/krwashington\/\/17075348.htm\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>E-mails contradict testimony in U.S. attorneys scandal<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">A U.S. attorney in Wisconsin who prosecuted a state Democratic official on corruption charges during last year&#8217;s heated governor&#8217;s race was once targeted for firing by the Department of Justice, but given a reprieve for reasons that remain unclear. A federal appeals court last week threw out the conviction of Wisconsin state worker Georgia Thompson, saying the evidence was &quot;beyond thin.&quot;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Congressional investigators looking into the firings of eight U.S. attorneys saw Wisconsin prosecutor Steven M. Biskupic&#8217;s name on a list of lawyers targeted for removal when they were inspecting a Justice Department document not yet made public, according to an attorney for a lawmaker involved in the investigation. The attorney asked for anonymity because of the political sensitivity of the investigation. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> It wasn&#8217;t clear when Biskupic was added to a Justice Department hit list of prosecutors, or when he was taken off, or whether those developments were connected to the just-overturned corruption case. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Nevertheless, the disclosure aroused investigators&#8217; suspicion that Biskupic might have been retained in his job because he agreed to prosecute Democrats, though the evidence was slight. Such politicization of the administration of justice is at the heart of congressional Democrats&#8217; concerns over the Bush administration&#8217;s firings of the U.S. attorneys. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Republicans had cited the June 2006 conviction as evidence that Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle&#8217;s administration was rife with corruption as he ran for re-election last year. He won anyway &#8211; the first Democratic governor of the state to win re-election in 32 years. <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"> This revelation about Biskupic is expected to be the subject of questions to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales when he testifies Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee.<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">and&#8230;  <\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.shepherd-express.com\/1editorialbody.lasso?-token.folder=2007-04-12&#038;-token.story=176890.113121&#038;-token.subpub=\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Making Sense of the Georgia Thompson Ruling<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">Thursday&rsquo;s ruling by the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago, which immediately freed former state worker Georgia Thompson, was a stunner. Not only did the three federal judges immediately give Thompson her freedom, but they also delivered a smack-down to the Milwaukee office of U.S. Attorney Steven Biskupic, calling the evidence in the case &ldquo;beyond thin.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> So how did that happen? Why would a prosecutor, working on the taxpayers&rsquo; dime, press charges when the evidence was negligible? Why did a jury convict based on that same evidence? And why was Thompson given the unusual punishment of going to federal prison while her case was being appealed?<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">Why? Because the political climate&mdash;in George W. Bush&rsquo;s America, in Wisconsin and in Milwaukee, in particular, where the case was decided&mdash;is so poisoned by political games that the jury sent a message that wasn&rsquo;t based on the evidence introduced in the courtroom.<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">&quot;<font color=\"#600000\"><strong>Because the political climate&mdash;in George W. Bush&rsquo;s America<\/strong> &#8230; <strong>is so poisoned by political games<\/strong> <strong>that the jury sent a message that wasn&rsquo;t based on the evidence introduced in the courtroom<\/strong><\/font>.&quot; I guess this is the bottom line point to it all: a C.I.A. Agent&#8217;s career abruptly ended because her husband, a former Ambassador, wrote an op-ed article criticisng the Administration; a state procurement supervisor who awarded a contract to someone who supported the Democratic governor sent to prison; U.S. Attorneys fired for pressing corruption charges against [corrupt] Republicans. <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>E-mails contradict testimony in U.S. attorneys scandal A U.S. attorney in Wisconsin who prosecuted a state Democratic official on corruption charges during last year&#8217;s heated governor&#8217;s race was once targeted for firing by the Department of Justice, but given a reprieve for reasons that remain unclear. A federal appeals court last week threw out the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1139","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1139","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1139"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1139\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1139"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1139"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1139"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}