{"id":1151,"date":"2007-04-18T11:20:52","date_gmt":"2007-04-18T16:20:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2007\/04\/18\/scotus\/"},"modified":"2007-04-18T11:25:50","modified_gmt":"2007-04-18T16:25:50","slug":"scotus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2007\/04\/18\/scotus\/","title":{"rendered":"SCOTUS&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<br \/>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2007\/04\/18\/supreme-partial-birth\/\"><strong>Breaking: Supreme Court Upholds &lsquo;Partial Birth&rsquo; Abortion Ban<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court has upheld a nationwide ban on &ldquo;partial birth&rdquo; abortion, &ldquo;marking a shift on the high-profile issue and underscoring the impact of President George W. Bush&rsquo;s two high court appointments.&rdquo; The justices &ldquo;refused to invalidate the 2003 law even though it lacks an exception for cases posing a risk to the mother&rsquo;s health. The court also rejected claims that the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act is so vaguely worded it would force doctors to forgo a commonly used, constitutionally protected abortion technique for fear of prosecution. &rdquo;<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"><strong>UPDATE:<\/strong> In the majority were swing vote Anthony Kennedy, along with Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito, Scalia, and Thomas.<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\"><img decoding=\"async\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/snip.gif\" \/><\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\"><strong>UPDATE III:<\/strong> Justice Clarence Thomas authored, and Justice Antonin Scalia joined, a 137-word concurring opinion, which appears to have the sole purpose of stating: &ldquo;I write separately to reiterate my view that the Court\u00c2\u2019s abortion jurisprudence, including Casey and Roe v. Wade, 410 U. S. 113 (1973), has no basis in the Constitution.&rdquo;<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">At the core, I&#8217;ve always considered Birth Control and Abortion Medical issues &#8211; something to be decided by individuals and their physicians. To my mind, the act of conception is over-ruled by a woman&#8217;s desire to raise a child. I don&#8217;t know anyone in my profession that thinks otherwise. The central force in healthy development is being a &quot;wanted&quot; child. But I don&#8217;t see my perspective as the only one around. What bothers me about what&#8217;s happening now is that it&#8217;s not part of a thoughtful debate, it&#8217;s a religious conviction, and it&#8217;s a political hook that dominates our American landscape. At times, <img decoding=\"async\" width=\"200\" hspace=\"5\" border=\"1\" align=\"right\" src=\"http:\/\/www.clemson.edu\/caah\/history\/FacultyPages\/PamMack\/lec124\/rats.jpg\" \/>I feel like saying, &quot;Let them win.&quot; It&#8217;s too expensive to even fight on this battlefield. We&#8217;ll raise money to send women who are pregnant and desire to terminate their pregnancies to another, more sensible country. But I know it wouldn&#8217;t matter. They&#8217;d just brand such women as criminals. So we have to live with a group that has only one issue or two, [if you throw in Gay Marriage].<\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">My reason for highlighting this decision, however, is to point to the vote &#8211; <strong>5 to 4<\/strong>. Anthony Kennedy plus the Bush bloc vote of&nbsp; <strong>R<\/strong><sub>oberts<\/sub> <strong>A<\/strong><sub>lito<\/sub> <strong>T<\/strong><sub>homas<\/sub> <strong>S<\/strong><sub>calia<\/sub>. Very disturbing&#8230;<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\">&nbsp;<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Breaking: Supreme Court Upholds &lsquo;Partial Birth&rsquo; Abortion Ban In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court has upheld a nationwide ban on &ldquo;partial birth&rdquo; abortion, &ldquo;marking a shift on the high-profile issue and underscoring the impact of President George W. Bush&rsquo;s two high court appointments.&rdquo; The justices &ldquo;refused to invalidate the 2003 law even though it [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1151","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1151","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1151"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1151\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1151"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1151"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1151"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}