{"id":1161,"date":"2007-04-19T23:11:24","date_gmt":"2007-04-20T04:11:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2007\/04\/19\/1161\/"},"modified":"2007-04-19T23:15:12","modified_gmt":"2007-04-20T04:15:12","slug":"1161","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2007\/04\/19\/1161\/","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"<br \/>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/04\/20\/opinion\/20fri1.html\"><strong>Gonzales v. Gonzales<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<p>If Attorney General Alberto Gonzales had gone to the Senate yesterday to convince the world that he ought to be fired, it&rsquo;s hard to imagine how he could have done a better job, short of simply admitting the obvious: that the firing of eight United States attorneys was a partisan purge.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Mr. Gonzales came across as a dull-witted apparatchik incapable of running one of the most important departments in the executive branch.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">He had no trouble remembering complaints from his bosses and Republican lawmakers about federal prosecutors who were not playing ball with the Republican Party&rsquo;s efforts to drum up election fraud charges against Democratic politicians and Democratic voters. But he had no idea whether any of the 93 United States attorneys working for him &mdash; let alone the ones he fired &mdash; were doing a good job prosecuting real crimes. <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">He delegated responsibility for purging their ranks to an inexperienced and incompetent assistant who, if that&rsquo;s possible, was even more of a plodding apparatchik. Mr. Gonzales failed to create the most rudimentary standards for judging the prosecutors&rsquo; work, except for political fealty. And when it came time to explain his inept decision making to the public, he gave a false account that was instantly and repeatedly contradicted by sworn testimony&#8230;<\/div>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/><strong>ap&middot;pa&middot;ra&middot;tchik<\/strong>&nbsp;&nbsp; (&auml;&#8217;p\u00c9\u2122-r&auml;&#8217;ch\u00c4\u00adk)&nbsp; <br \/>  n.&nbsp;&nbsp;<em>pl.<\/em> <strong>ap&middot;pa&middot;ra&middot;tchiks<\/strong> or <strong>ap&middot;pa&middot;ra&middot;tchi&middot;ki<\/strong> (-ch\u00c4\u00ad-k\u00c4\u201c)                      <\/p>\n<ol>  <\/ol>\n<ol>\n<li>A member of a Communist apparat.<\/li>\n<li>An unquestioningly loyal subordinate, especially of a political leader or organization.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div>\n<div align=\"justify\">This New York Times editorial is scathing. They say, &quot;Mr. Gonzales came across as a dull-witted apparatchik incapable of running one of the most important departments in the executive branch&quot; and I agree with that. Over and above the partisan firing of the Attorneys, over and beyond his evasive and probably untrue answers, he came across as an unengaged, inept, lightweight. [and with only a little substitution, the same sentence could be applied to Bush. <em>Mr. <strong><font color=\"#cc0000\">Bush<\/font><\/strong> came across as a dull-witted apparatchik incapable of running one of the most important <strong><font color=\"#cc0000\">countries<\/font><\/strong> in the <strong><font color=\"#cc0000\">world<\/font><\/strong>.<\/em>]<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">As for Gonzales, if he&#8217;s telling the truth, he&#8217;s grossly incompetent. If he&#8217;s not telling the truth, he&#8217;s a gross liar. A likely scenerio? He&#8217;s grossly incompetent <u>and<\/u> he&#8217;s a gross liar. Three choices. All bad. I can see why his department is run on party loyalty. It&#8217;s the only thing he&#8217;s got going for himself&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gonzales v. Gonzales If Attorney General Alberto Gonzales had gone to the Senate yesterday to convince the world that he ought to be fired, it&rsquo;s hard to imagine how he could have done a better job, short of simply admitting the obvious: that the firing of eight United States attorneys was a partisan purge. Mr. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1161","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1161","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1161"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1161\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1161"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1161"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}