{"id":1528,"date":"2007-09-05T23:37:44","date_gmt":"2007-09-06T04:37:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2007\/09\/05\/utterly-amazing\/"},"modified":"2007-09-06T00:01:50","modified_gmt":"2007-09-06T05:01:50","slug":"utterly-amazing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2007\/09\/05\/utterly-amazing\/","title":{"rendered":"utterly amazing&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Like the bad penny, the case of <strong>Senator Larry Craig<\/strong> just will not go away. Now, the left-wing bloggers are coming up with his strategies for him to get his&nbsp;<strike> conviction&nbsp;<\/strike> guilty plea reversed: <\/p>\n<p>Jeralyn at <font color=\"#000066\"><strong>Talk Left<\/strong><\/font> says:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p align=\"justify\">I&#8217;m sticking by my <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkleft.com\/story\/2007\/8\/30\/17438\/1886\"><strong>earlier comments<\/strong><\/a>&nbsp; that his guilty plea was defective for failing to advise him of his right to counsel and contain an acknowledgment by him that he understood the right and was waiving it. Minnesota law is very clear on that. His guilty plea form is <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkleft.com\/docs\/craigguiltyplea.pdf\">here<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">It shouldn&#8217;t even require a hearing. A Judge could grant the motion based on the paperwork. I won&#8217;t be surprised if the prosecutor confesses the motion. I also think Craig&#8217;s statement to McConnell is based on Billy Martin thinking there&#8217;s a good chance the Judge will rule on his motion to withdraw the plea within the next three weeks.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.americablog.com\/2007\/09\/is-this-going-to-be-craigs-defense.html\" target=\"_blank\"><font color=\"#990000\"><strong>AMERICA<\/strong><\/font><font color=\"#000099\"><strong>blog<\/strong><\/font><\/a> links to the World Daily Net, &quot;From <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.worldnetdaily.com\/news\/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57484\"><strong>WND&#8217;s Joseph Farah<\/strong><\/a>. Please let Craig try this one. Mitch McConnell will keel over.&quot;<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\"> Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, didn&#8217;t have to plead guilty to sex charges stemming from a men&#8217;s room encounter with an undercover cop in Minnesota. All he had to do was hand the police officer a copy of the U.S. Constitution &ndash; the document the senator swore to uphold upon first taking office in Congress 27 years earlier.<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">There is little ambiguity in <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.wnd.com\/redir\/r.asp?http:\/\/www.archives.gov\/national-archives-experience\/charters\/constitution_transcript.html\">Article 1: Section 6, which clearly states no member of Congress can be arrested while traveling to or from official session. <\/a><\/strong>Craig was arrested just after 12 noon June 11. <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.senate.gov\/legislative\/LIS\/roll_call_lists\/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&#038;session=1&#038;vote=00207\">He cast a vote on a high-profile cloture motion on the Senate floor at 5:55 p.m. that same day.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p align=\"justify\">So some judge in Minnesota is going to have to deal with a V.I.P. making a fuss over a routine Airport bathroom sweep for gay trollers, and the poor cop who stung Craig is going to have to be grilled about busting the guy for sexual solicitation by signalling him from the next toilet stall. What should the policeman have done? Had sex with the Senator to get a DNA sample? My guess is that they&#8217;ll find a way to harass them enough to get the plea withdrawn, and maybe get the case dismissed.&nbsp; Apparently, Craig&#8217;s lawyer is also questioning whether the Senate Ethics investigation is legal, since <strong>he wasn&#8217;t in the Minnesota Airport bathroom on Senate business<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/worldlatest\/story\/0,,-6898405,00.html\" target=\"_blank\"><font><strong>Craig Lawyers Ask Ethics Case Be Dropped<\/strong><\/font><\/a><\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\"><font>Lawyers for Sen. Larry Craig asked the Senate ethics committee Wednesday to reject a complaint based on the Idaho Republican&#8217;s guilty plea in a police undercover operation in an airport men&#8217;s room, saying the events were &quot;wholly unrelated&quot; to official duties. <\/font><\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">&quot;Assertion of jurisdiction over this matter by the committee would be literally unprecedented and would create deleterious consequences for the Senate as a whole,&quot; the lawyers wrote.<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<div><strong>Article 1, Section 6: &#8211; They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and <font color=\"#400040\">Breach of the Peace<\/font>, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place. <\/strong>Not to be picky, but wouldn&#8217;t &quot;Disorderly Conduct&quot; fall under &quot;Breach of the Peace?&quot;<\/div>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<div align=\"justify\">study terms for the history test on the Bush Era: <strong>hanging chads<\/strong><strong> &nbsp; <\/strong><strong>mini-benchmarks<\/strong>&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong>wide stance<\/strong><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Like the bad penny, the case of Senator Larry Craig just will not go away. Now, the left-wing bloggers are coming up with his strategies for him to get his&nbsp; conviction&nbsp; guilty plea reversed: Jeralyn at Talk Left says: I&#8217;m sticking by my earlier comments&nbsp; that his guilty plea was defective for failing to advise [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1528","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1528","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1528"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1528\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1528"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1528"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1528"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}