{"id":18855,"date":"2012-01-30T12:09:44","date_gmt":"2012-01-30T17:09:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=18855"},"modified":"2012-01-31T07:51:50","modified_gmt":"2012-01-31T12:51:50","slug":"the-real-consumers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2012\/01\/30\/the-real-consumers\/","title":{"rendered":"the real consumers&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"justify\">Childhood Schizophrenia is an uncommon disorder &#8211; little studied except on a case by case basis. But following the CATIE, CUtLASS, and European Schizophrenia Trials comparing the first generation antipsychotics to the atypicals, the NIMH did a similar study in children.<\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/ajp.psychiatryonline.org\/article.aspx?Volume=165&#038;page=1420&#038;journalID=13\" target=\"_blank\"><u><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Double-Blind  Comparison of First- and Second-Generation Antipsychotics in  Early-Onset Schizophrenia and Schizo-affective Disorder: Findings From  the Treatment of Early-Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders (TEOSS)  Study<\/font><\/strong><\/u><\/a><br \/>                <sup>by Linmarie  Sikich; Jean A. Frazier; Jon McClellan; Robert L. Findling; Benedetto  Vitiello; Louise Ritz; Denisse Ambler; Madeline Puglia; Ann E. Maloney;  Emily Michael; Sandra De Jong; Karen Slifka; Nancy Noyes; Stefanie  Hlastala; Leslie Pierson; Nora K. McNamara; Denise Delporto-Bedoya;  Robert Anderson; Robert M. Hamer; and Jeffrey A. Lieberman<\/sup><br \/>                <strong><font color=\"#004400\">American Journal of Psychiatry<\/font><\/strong>. 2008 165:1420-1431.<br \/>              [<strong><font color=\"#200020\">full text online<\/font><\/strong>]<\/div>\n<p>               <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"><sup><u><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Objective<\/font><\/strong><\/u>:  Atypical [second-generation] antipsychotics are considered standard  treatment for children and adolescents with early-onset schizophrenia  and schizoaffective disorder. However, the superiority of  second-generation antipsychotics over first-generation antipsychotics  has not been demonstrated. This study compared the efficacy and safety  of two second-generation antipsychotics (olanzapine and risperidone)  with a first-generation antipsychotic (molindone) in the treatment of  early-onset schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.<br \/>               <u><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Method<\/font><\/strong><\/u>: This  double-blind multisite trial randomly assigned pediatric patients with  early-onset schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder to treatment with  either olanzapine (2.5&mdash;20 mg\/day), risperidone (0.5&mdash;6 mg\/day), or  molindone [10&mdash;140 mg\/day, plus 1 mg\/day of benztropine] for 8 weeks. The  primary outcome was response to treatment, defined as a Clinical Global  Impression (CGI) improvement score of 1 or 2 and &ge;20% reduction in  Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS] total score after 8 weeks  of treatment.<br \/>                <u><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Results<\/font><\/strong><\/u>: In total, 119 youth were randomly assigned to  treatment. Of these subjects, 116 received at least one dose of  treatment and thus were available for analysis. No significant  differences were found among treatment groups in response rates  (molindone: 50%; olanzapine: 34%; risperidone: 46%) or magnitude of  symptom reduction. Olanzapine and risperidone were associated with  significantly greater weight gain. Olanzapine showed the greatest risk  of weight gain and significant increases in fasting cholesterol, low  density lipoprotein, insulin, and liver transaminase levels. Molindone  led to more self-reports of akathisia.<br \/>               <u><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Conclusions<\/font><\/strong><\/u>: Risperidone and  olanzapine did not demonstrate superior efficacy over molindone for  treating early-onset schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Adverse  effects were frequent but differed among medications. The results  question the nearly exclusive use of second-generation antipsychotics to  treat early-onset schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. The  safety findings related to weight gain and metabolic problems raise  important public health concerns, given the widespread use of  second-generation antipsychotics in youth for nonpsychotic disorders.<\/sup><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div>First efficacy:<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\"><img decoding=\"async\" border=\"0\" vspace=\"5\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/teoss-1.gif\" \/><\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">And the side effects:<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"192\" border=\"0\" width=\"364\" vspace=\"5\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/teoss-2.gif\" \/><\/div>\n<div align=\"center\"><img decoding=\"async\" border=\"0\" vspace=\"5\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/teoss-3.gif\" \/><\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">Following completion of the 8 week trial, they offered the responders [&quot;<em>the  primary outcome was response to treatment,  defined as a Clinical Global  Impression (CGI) improvement score of 1 or  2 and &ge;20% reduction in  Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)  total score after 8 weeks  of treatment<\/em>&quot;] the chance to continue on the medication for a total of one year&#8217;s treatment.<font color=\"#200020\"><br \/>        <\/font><\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC2882800\/?tool=pubmed\" target=\"_blank\"><u><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Double-blind maintenance safety and effectiveness findings from the Treatment of Early-Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum [TEOSS] study<\/font><\/strong><\/u><\/a><br \/>           <sup>by Findling RL, Johnson JL, McClellan J, Frazier JA, Vitiello B, Hamer RM, Lieberman JA, Ritz L, McNamara NK, Lingler J, Hlastala S, Pierson L, Puglia M, Maloney AE, Kaufman EM, Noyes N, and Sikich L.<\/sup><br \/>           <strong><font color=\"#200020\">Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry<\/font><\/strong>. 2010 49(6):583-94.<br \/>         [<strong><font color=\"#200020\">full text online<\/font><\/strong>]<\/div>\n<p>         <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"><sup><strong><font color=\"#200020\">OBJECTIVE<\/font><\/strong>: To examine the long-term safety and efficacy of three antipsychotics in early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders.<br \/>           <strong><font color=\"#200020\">METHOD<\/font><\/strong>: Patients [8 to 19 years old] who had improved during an 8-week, randomized,  double-blind acute trial of olanzapine, risperidone, or molindone [plus  benztropine] were eligible to continue on the same medication for up to  44 additional weeks under double-blind conditions. Adjunctive  medications were allowed according to defined algorithms. Standardized  symptom, safety, and functional assessments were conducted every 4  weeks.<br \/>           <strong><font color=\"#200020\">RESULTS<\/font><\/strong>: Of the 116 youths randomized in the acute  trial, 54 entered maintenance treatment [molindone, n = 20; olanzapine,  n = 13; risperidone, n = 21]. Fourteen [26%] completed 44 weeks of  treatment. Adverse effects [n = 15], inadequate efficacy [n = 14], or  study nonadherence [n = 8] were the most common reasons for  discontinuation. The three treatment arms did not significantly differ  in symptom decrease or time to discontinuation. Akathisia was more  common with molindone and elevated prolactin concentrations more common  with risperidone. Although weight gain and metabolic adverse events had  occurred more often with olanzapine and risperidone during the acute  trial, no significant between-drug differences emerged in most of these  parameters during maintenance treatment. <br \/>           <strong><font color=\"#200020\">CONCLUSIONS<\/font><\/strong>: Only 12% of youths with early-onset <span class=\"highlight\">schizophrenia<\/span>  spectrum disorders continued on their originally randomized treatment  at 52 weeks. No agent demonstrated superior efficacy, and all were  associated with side effects, including weight gain. Improved treatments  are needed for early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders.<\/sup><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><img decoding=\"async\" border=\"0\" vspace=\"5\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/teoss-4.gif\" \/><\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">I massively simplified their Table 3 to look at just efficacy and weight gain:        <\/div>\n<div align=\"center\"><img decoding=\"async\" border=\"0\" width=\"350\" vspace=\"5\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/teoss-5.gif\" \/><\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">I looked into TEOSS because I&#8217;d listened to all those Call-Notes by the Janssen Sales Reps promoting off label uses for Risperdal in horror, noticing that they weren&#8217;t even promoting if for use in Schizophrenia, its intended target [<u><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2012\/01\/28\/much-to-ponder\/\" target=\"_blank\"><font color=\"#200020\">much to ponder&hellip;<\/font><\/a><\/strong><\/u>]. But I realized I didn&#8217;t actually know what it would do for kids with Schizophrenia [the uncommon cases that came along where Risperdal might have been a rational choice]. Dr. Perry had mentioned TEOSS in his Janssen Trial testimony, a study I wasn&#8217;t familiar with, so voila&#8217;. And here&#8217;s C.A.T.I.E.: <\/div>\n<p align=\"center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"271\" border=\"0\" width=\"520\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/catie-2.gif\" \/><br \/> <sup>from <strong><font color=\"#200020\">C.A.T.I.E.<\/font><\/strong> [for comparison]<\/sup><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">In the adult non-industry-initiated trials like C.A.T.I.E., Olanzapine won the efficacy side but faltered badly on weight gain and other metabolic parameters. With the kids, it wasn&#8217;t superior in efficacy [probably the opposite]; it looks like some responders stopped taking it after two months; and it is a metabolic nightmare. I didn&#8217;t even look at this study to learn more about Zyprexa, but there it is in the data. I was looking at the study to see if there was anything in what the Janssen Sales Reps said that might actually be true about Risperdal. I was surprised by the fact that the Risperdal cohort gained about the same amount of weight as the Zyprexa group [I think that I&#8217;d fallen for Janssen&#8217;s hype myself &#8211; that it was more weight neutral].  <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">Sorry if I&#8217;m reporting on stale news here, but I guess I&#8217;m still incredulous. These are some of the best-selling drugs in the history of medicine, blockbusters all. And the majority of the profitability had to come from off-label sales [there just aren&#8217;t enough Schizophrenic people around to explain the profitability]. And by no parameter that I can see are these drugs superior to their inexpensive predecessors &#8211; neither in children nor adults. And every single pill was prescribed by a physician of one sort or another. Clearly, the physicians are the real consumers and those Sales Reps did a helluva good job&#8230; <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Childhood Schizophrenia is an uncommon disorder &#8211; little studied except on a case by case basis. But following the CATIE, CUtLASS, and European Schizophrenia Trials comparing the first generation antipsychotics to the atypicals, the NIMH did a similar study in children. Double-Blind Comparison of First- and Second-Generation Antipsychotics in Early-Onset Schizophrenia and Schizo-affective Disorder: Findings [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18855","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18855","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18855"}],"version-history":[{"count":43,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18855\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18968,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18855\/revisions\/18968"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18855"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18855"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18855"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}