{"id":21679,"date":"2012-03-29T18:55:07","date_gmt":"2012-03-29T22:55:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=21679"},"modified":"2012-03-29T20:28:50","modified_gmt":"2012-03-30T00:28:50","slug":"21679","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2012\/03\/29\/21679\/","title":{"rendered":"in Arkansas?&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"justify\">The legal system is difficult for me. I respect it, but I&#8217;m often confused by it. It seems to thrive on logical fallacy and concrete details. Abstract thinking and judgement appears forbidden. And a trial is more like a chess game than a search for the truth. There was a <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/texas-transcripts\/2012-01-13%20State%20v.%20Janssen%20Vol%205.pdf#page=160\"><u><strong><font color=\"#200020\">point<\/font><\/strong><\/u><\/a> in the Texas Risperdal trial after an indicting testimony by Arnold Fried where the cross examiner went on and on with a monologue interrupted only occasionally by a yes\/no question detailing the Janssen party&nbsp; line. I can&#8217;t imagine that the Jury couldn&#8217;t see that the lawyer was afraid of to let the witness talk, but was using the monologue to try to sell them on his client&#8217;s benevolence. I started to doodle. Others took a pee-break. It was agonizing, boring, almost child-like. J&amp;J is appealing losses in South Carolina and Louisiana, having won their appeal in West Virginia. Only the Texas loss has been settled definitively. So now it&#8217;s State number five, Arkansas:<\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/2012-03-27\/j-j-duped-arkansas-doctors-over-risperdal-lawyer-tells-jury-1-.html\" target=\"_blank\"><u><strong><font color=\"#200020\">J&amp;J Duped Arkansas Doctors Over Risperdal, Lawyer Tells Jury<\/font><\/strong><\/u><\/a><br \/>   <strong><font color=\"#200020\">Reuters<\/font><\/strong><br \/>  By                     Jef Feeley, Eric Francis and Margaret Cronin Fisk<br \/>  March 27, 2012<\/div>\n<p> <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"><sup>Johnson &amp; Johnson [JNJ] officials repeatedly misled Arkansas doctors about the safety of the antipsychotic drug Risperdal, and the drugmaker should be held responsible for those deceptions, a lawyer said.   J&amp;J&rsquo;s Janssen unit made misleading claims about Risperdal&rsquo;s health risks and effectiveness in a letter to more than 6,200 Arkansas doctors, violating the state&rsquo;s deceptive-trade practices law, one of the state&rsquo;s lawyers told a jury in Little Rock today. Arkansas is seeking more than $1.25 billion in penalties over the campaign. &ldquo;By the time this case is over, we will prove to you that Janssen lied about Risperdal&rsquo;s dangers just to make money,&rdquo; Fletcher Trammell, an attorney for Arkansas, told jurors in opening statements in the state-court trial over J&amp;J&rsquo;s Risperdal marketing tactics.<\/p>\n<p>   It&rsquo;s the fifth jury trial over states&rsquo; claims that J&amp;J, the <span class=\"web_ticker\">second-biggest<\/span> maker of health products, hid Risperdal&rsquo;s diabetes risks and tricked Medicaid regulators into paying millions of dollars more than they should have for the medicine. J&amp;J ended the most recent trial in Texas with a $158 million settlement in January. The Texas settlement won court approval today.<\/p>\n<p>   J&amp;J has said it provided proper warnings about diabetes risks on Risperdal&rsquo;s label and that U.S. regulators approved those disclosures. Efforts to tie labeling claims to Medicaid fraud should fail because &ldquo;compliance with federal drug labeling statutes and regulations is not a condition of payment or participating in&rdquo; a state Medicaid program, J&amp;J said in a July 2010 court filing.<\/p>\n<p>   Janssen didn&rsquo;t engage in deceptive trade practices and didn&rsquo;t harm anyone, James Simpson, a company lawyer, told the jury today.<\/sup><sup> &ldquo;The state will not present any evidence that a single person was injured while taking Risperdal,&rdquo; Simpson said in his opening statement. &ldquo;There will not be any evidence that the state of Arkansas lost a penny in paying for Risperdal for thousands of Arkansas citizens who needed the drug&rdquo;&#8230;<\/sup><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">Same opening gambits, same Reuters reporters, same chess game being played out once again. It reminds me of that saying, &quot;<em>insanity is doing the same thing over and over, expecting different results<\/em>.&quot;<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">Texas may have been a turning point in that J&amp;J wasn&#8217;t willing to go to the jury and settled with no chance of appeal. In the earlier ones, they let it play out. People thought the Texas settlements was <em><strong><font color=\"#200020\">low<\/font><\/strong><\/em>. The truth about it was that it was <em><strong><font color=\"#200020\">sure<\/font><\/strong><\/em>. LA and SC are still tied up in appeals. With Texas sitting there, the States are probably going to feel more empowered to either ask for larger settlements or go to a Jury. Who ever knows? But that&#8217;s just my thought.<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">This story isn&#8217;t close to being over. I&#8217;m hoping that the extent of the ghost-writing by <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.excerptamedica.com\/\"><strong><font color=\"#000000\">E<\/font><font color=\"#990000\">x<\/font><font color=\"#000000\">cerpta<\/font> <font color=\"#990000\">Medica<\/font><\/strong><\/a> in this case makes it into open court [see the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/media2.kxan.com\/PDF\/Daniel_Rothman_Expert_Report_300dpi.pdf#page=43\"><u><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Rothman Report<\/font><\/strong><\/u><\/a>]. Their comradeship in helping J&amp;J actively corrupt and contaminate our psychiatric literature is yet untold. Maybe it&#8217;ll happen in Arkansas?&#8230;<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The legal system is difficult for me. I respect it, but I&#8217;m often confused by it. It seems to thrive on logical fallacy and concrete details. Abstract thinking and judgement appears forbidden. And a trial is more like a chess game than a search for the truth. There was a point in the Texas Risperdal [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21679","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21679","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21679"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21679\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21692,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21679\/revisions\/21692"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21679"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21679"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21679"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}