{"id":2676,"date":"2008-12-08T20:31:04","date_gmt":"2008-12-09T01:31:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=2676"},"modified":"2008-12-09T02:14:05","modified_gmt":"2008-12-09T07:14:05","slug":"what-is-irrational","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2008\/12\/08\/what-is-irrational\/","title":{"rendered":"what <u>is<\/u> irrational?&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"justify\">Correcting the <font color=\"#300030\"><strong>Dow Jones Industrial Average<\/strong><\/font> to compare values over time is an interesting problem. People try looking at log plots:<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\">&nbsp;<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"400\" width=\"520\" vspace=\"7\" border=\"1\" src=\"http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/c\/cd\/DJIA_historical_graph_%28log%29.svg\/800px-DJIA_historical_graph_%28log%29.svg.png\" \/><\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\"> <img decoding=\"async\" hspace=\"5\" width=\"180\" border=\"0\" align=\"right\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/cpi-u.gif\" \/>or to divide it by something else &#8211; some other average. The most rational version I found is to divide the <font color=\"#300030\"><strong>Dow Jones Industrial Average<\/strong><\/font> by the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bls.gov\/cpi\/home.htm\" target=\"_blank\"><font color=\"#300030\"><strong>Consumer Price Index<\/strong><\/font><\/a>. Like the <font color=\"#300030\"><strong>DJIA<\/strong><\/font> which averages the price of certain stocks, the <font color=\"#300030\"><strong>CPI-U<\/strong><\/font> is how much consumers pay for a representative basket of goods and services. <\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">So the Index from <font color=\"#300030\"><strong>DJIA\/CPI-U<\/strong><\/font> is the comparative buying power of the Stock Market assuming each of these indexes is a stable measure over time. The <font color=\"#300030\"><strong>CPI-U<\/strong><\/font> is widely held to represent the actual real value of our currency [a wonderful word, <strong>currency<\/strong> &#8211; the value that is <em><strong>current<\/strong><\/em>].<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><img decoding=\"async\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/DJI_CPI.gif\" \/><br \/>      <sup>[There is an explanation of this graph <u><a href=\"http:\/\/homepage.mac.com\/ttsmyf\/\" target=\"_blank\"><font color=\"#200020\"><strong>here<\/strong><\/font><\/a><\/u> and a more extensive analysis at <u><a href=\"http:\/\/www.itulip.com\/realdow.htm\" target=\"_blank\"><font color=\"#200020\"><strong>iTulip]<\/strong><\/font><\/a><\/u><\/sup><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">I like it! It makes sense to me because it shows what everything else would indicate it ought to show. It documents my experience of the 1950&#8217;s, the post War economy that created the suburbs I grew up in, rock and roll, and a relaxed stable economy [never mind that there was the constant fear of thermonuclear holocaust]. Then things headed downward during the Viet Nam War and the tumultuous sixties and early seventies [when Nixon floated the dollar to pay for the war]. I don&#8217;t know what I think about the upturn in the early 1980&#8217;s. Reagan was messing with things a lot &#8211; running up the national debt like it was a credit card, spending big on the military, deregulating the Banks, etc. There&#8217;s even a blip in 1987 where the Market tried to soar, but was corrected by the <strong>1987 <em>crash&middot;let<\/em><\/strong>. So I&#8217;ll pass on the years between 1980 and 1995. I think there are lots of smoke and mirrors there, but I&#8217;ll leave that for the experts. But I&#8217;ve got something to say about the graph from 1995 to the present. <font color=\"#300030\"><strong>Around 1995<u>+<\/u>, we fell in love with techno-anything<\/strong><\/font>:<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">&nbsp;<img decoding=\"async\" border=\"1\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/techno.jpg\" \/><br \/> <sup>techno-bubbles on parade&#8230;<\/sup><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">From left to right: <strong>Technology<\/strong>, <strong>Telecommunications<\/strong>, <strong>Mobile Communications<\/strong>, <strong>Internet<\/strong>, <strong>Computer Hardware<\/strong>. It was a bubble, as they say [bigger that just the DOT.COM&#8217;s]. But it was also a technology market that picked up with sustained growth after the bubble[s] burst. However it sure doesn&#8217;t account for the Stock Market&#8217;s continued high performance. But we know about that now. There&#8217;s the HOUSING bubble rising as the technology bubble burst. And after the HOUSING bubble burst, we still had the OIL bubble soaring until mid-June of this year. Bubbles upon bubbles, helped along by Greenspan&#8217;s playing with interest rates, the antics of the Bankers, and the side bets on the unregulated Credit Default Swap Markets &#8211; AKA <strong>The Casino<\/strong>. Bubbles and gamblers add no real value to the Market. They just move wealth from losers to winners &#8211; falsely inflating the Market in the process.<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"176\" width=\"520\" border=\"1\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/bubli.jpg\" \/><br \/>  <sup>the march of the bubbles&#8230;<\/sup><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">In my last post, I was using Alan Greenspans phrase [<strong>Irrational Exuberance<\/strong>] and Robert Shiller&#8217;s musings about it as a <strong>straw man<\/strong>. Robert Shiller, in particular, has been an absolute prophet of the truth. But what is irrational on that graph is bigger than just &quot;irrational exuberance&quot; on the upside of a specific bubble. <font color=\"#300030\"><strong>The whole graph from at least 1995 on is irrational<\/strong><\/font>.<font color=\"#200020\"><strong> There is no way in hell that the value of the American Stock Market is 2&frac12; times greater in 2008 than it was in 1995, nor is it 7 times greater than it was in 1980<\/strong><\/font>. That&#8217;s what&#8217;s irrational! It&#8217;s so irrational that is reaches the level of <font color=\"#200020\"><strong>Delusion<\/strong><\/font> [a fixed false belief].<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"><img decoding=\"async\" hspace=\"5\" width=\"150\" border=\"1\" align=\"right\" src=\"http:\/\/www.stock-market-crash.net\/images\/1929-crash.gif\" \/>What is the Market&#8217;s true value? I don&#8217;t know. The <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/homepage.mac.com\/ttsmyf\/\"><strong>guy that drew that graph<\/strong><\/a> and <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.itulip.com\/realdow.htm\"><strong>iTulip<\/strong><\/a> have some ideas based on a mathematical model that seems rational, but I&#8217;ll leave that for your own exploration. All I came to say was that we&#8217;ve been living an irrational dream for a long time. Why didn&#8217;t we see that? For my part, it was because I didn&#8217;t look. I guess I thought somebody else was looking for me. Or maybe I just didn&#8217;t want to see the truth any more than almost everyone else. The whole Stock Market is a 1929-like bubble. That&#8217;s the way it looks to me now. In spite of Bush&#8217;s and McCain&#8217;s reassurances that the fundamentals of the economy are sound, the fundamentals of the economy have been dismal for a while. Our current task is to make a better recovery than Hoover made between the collapse in 1929 when it fell and the bottom three years later [when F.D.R. finally attacked things with a vengeance]&#8230;   <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Correcting the Dow Jones Industrial Average to compare values over time is an interesting problem. People try looking at log plots: &nbsp; or to divide it by something else &#8211; some other average. The most rational version I found is to divide the Dow Jones Industrial Average by the Consumer Price Index. Like the DJIA [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2676","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2676","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2676"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2676\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2676"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2676"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2676"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}