{"id":2720,"date":"2008-12-19T21:06:46","date_gmt":"2008-12-20T02:06:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=2720"},"modified":"2008-12-19T22:49:23","modified_gmt":"2008-12-20T03:49:23","slug":"value","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2008\/12\/19\/value\/","title":{"rendered":"the existential man…"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
The Madoff Economy<\/strong><\/a>
By PAUL KRUGMAN
December 19, 2008<\/div>\n

The revelation that Bernard Madoff — brilliant investor (or so almost everyone thought), philanthropist, pillar of the community — was a phony has shocked the world, and understandably so. The scale of his alleged $50 billion Ponzi scheme is hard to comprehend. Yet surely I’m not the only person to ask the obvious question: How different, really, is Mr. Madoff’s tale from the story of the investment industry as a whole?<\/sup><\/p>\n

The financial services industry has claimed an ever-growing share of the nation’s income over the past generation, making the people who run the industry incredibly rich. Yet, at this point, it looks as if much of the industry has been destroying value, not creating it. And it’s not just a matter of money: the vast riches achieved by those who managed other people’s money have had a corrupting effect on our society as a whole…<\/strong><\/font><\/p>\n

We’re talking about a lot of money here. In recent years the finance sector accounted for 8 percent of America’s G.D.P., up from less than 5 percent a generation earlier. If that extra 3 percent was money for nothing — and it probably was — we’re talking about $400 billion a year in waste, fraud and abuse. But the costs of America’s Ponzi era surely went beyond the direct waste of dollars and cents.<\/sup><\/p>\n

At the crudest level, Wall Street’s ill-gotten gains corrupted and continue to corrupt politics, in a nicely bipartisan way. From Bush administration officials like Christopher Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, who looked the other way as evidence of financial fraud mounted, to Democrats who still haven’t closed the outrageous tax loophole that benefits executives at hedge funds and private equity firms, politicians have walked when money talked.<\/sup><\/p>\n

Meanwhile, how much has our nation’s future been damaged by the magnetic pull of quick personal wealth, which for years has drawn many of our best and brightest young people into investment banking, at the expense of science, public service and just about everything else? Most of all, the vast riches being earned — or maybe that should be “earned” — in our bloated financial industry undermined our sense of reality and degraded our judgment.<\/strong><\/font><\/p>\n

Think of the way almost everyone important missed the warning signs of an impending crisis. How was that possible? How, for example, could Alan Greenspan have declared, just a few years ago, that “the financial system as a whole has become more resilient” — thanks to derivatives, no less? The answer, I believe, is that there’s an innate tendency on the part of even the elite to idolize men who are making a lot of money, and assume that they know what they’re doing. After all, that’s why so many people trusted Mr. Madoff.<\/sup><\/p>\n

Now, as we survey the wreckage and try to understand how things can have gone so wrong, so fast, the answer is actually quite simple: What we’re looking at now are the consequences of a world gone Madoff.<\/sup><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Klugman is a thoughtful guy. He makes two indelible points: <\/div>\n