{"id":2769,"date":"2009-01-03T11:37:07","date_gmt":"2009-01-03T16:37:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=2769"},"modified":"2009-01-03T11:45:18","modified_gmt":"2009-01-03T16:45:18","slug":"one-must-think-of-the-final-result","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2009\/01\/03\/one-must-think-of-the-final-result\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;one must think of the final result&#8221;&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p align=\"justify\">We&#8217;ve had quite a run recently with the ethical dilemma &#8211; &quot;<font color=\"#300030\"><strong>the ends justify the means<\/strong><\/font>.&quot; The outgoing Bush Administration clearly comes down hard on one side of the argument. Assasinating Saddam Hussein, pre-emptively invading a soveriegn nation without provocation, torturing prisoners of war, domestic spying, using the Department of Justice politically, invalidating Congress with Signing Statements, revealing the identity of a <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" hspace=\"4\" height=\"69\" width=\"51\" border=\"1\" align=\"left\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/machiavelli.gif\" alt=\"Nicola Machiavelli\" title=\"Nicola Machiavelli\" \/>C.I.A. Agent, etc. &#8211; this list has become interminable.The quote is often attributed to Nicola Machievelli [<u>The Prince<\/u>] translating &quot;<em>si guarda al fine<\/em>&quot; from Italian. The phrase is better translated, &quot;<em>one must think of the final result<\/em>.&quot; I hope that&#8217;s what Machiavelli meant &#8211; it&#8217;s a better maxim to live by. But whoever said &quot;<font color=\"#300030\"><strong>the ends justify the means<\/strong><\/font>&quot; isn&#8217;t the point, it&#8217;s been the philosophy of our country for eight years or more.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" hspace=\"4\" height=\"129\" width=\"91\" border=\"1\" align=\"right\" src=\"http:\/\/tbn3.google.com\/images?q=tbn:bEfb57Eo7xrokM:http:\/\/www.podgallery.com\/images\/gallery\/239A.jpg\" \/>Now we hear it about our economy. Like everyone else, I&#8217;ve documented the political circus that has permitted the unregulated derivatives market and created the secretive Hedge Funds. All of the arguments that are being mounted to continue allowing this absolute silliness is that they allow people on Wall Street to &quot;make money&quot; for themselves and their investors, nevermind the effect on our economy and my personal retirement account, or should I say <em>former<\/em> <em>retirement account<\/em>. In my last post, I quoted <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cfr.org\/bios\/4452\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Sebastian Mallaby<\/strong><\/a>, &quot;Good hedge funds really do know how to make money out of market inefficiencies.&quot; Ergo what? that it justifies what they and the other players in the murky casino of the &quot;dark market&quot; &#8211; derivative trading &#8211; should be allowed to be the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/William_Kidd\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Captain Kidd<\/strong><\/a>s in a Wall Street Carribean? Piracy made lots of money. Slave Trading made plenty of money. The Robber Barons made money. The problem is that it&#8217;s somebody else&#8217;s money &#8211; taken, not made&#8230;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" hspace=\"4\" height=\"124\" width=\"110\" vspace=\"3\" border=\"1\" align=\"left\" src=\"http:\/\/tbn1.google.com\/images?q=tbn:QTslnZY2KkbZ1M:http:\/\/www.peacebuttons.info\/E-News\/images\/AfricanSlaveTradePoster.jpg\" \/>If it is true that Machiavelli has been misquoted, and what he meant to advise was &quot;<em>one must think of the final result<\/em>,&quot; his quote should be emblazoned in the entrance to the White House, the Capital Building, the New York Stock Exchange, and Market Exchanges around the world. What&#8217;s wrong with &quot;<font color=\"#300030\"><strong>the ends justify the means<\/strong><\/font>&quot; isn&#8217;t just some simple morality. If one is even thinking it, it betrays that there is something awry. &quot;I shouldn&#8217;t be torturing people, <strong>but<\/strong> the September 11th attack on the Twin Trade Towers justifies it.&quot; &quot;I shouldn&#8217;t be blowing up the Twin Trade Towers, <strong>but<\/strong> the hubris of the Americans intruding on holy lands justifies it.&quot; &quot;I shouldn&#8217;t be exploiting the market inefficiencies, <strong>but<\/strong> my clients want a good return.&quot; There&#8217;s always a <strong>but<\/strong> that explains doing something that exploits others and has potentially dire consequences.<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">There is, in fact, a moral theory that specifically addresses this kind of thought:<\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Consequentialism\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Consequentialism<\/strong><\/a> refers to those moral theories which hold that the consequences of a particular action form the basis for any valid moral judgment about that action. Thus, from a consequentialist standpoint, a morally right action is one that produces a good outcome, or consequence.<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div>Dick Cheney is not a <u><strong>Consequentialist<\/strong><\/u>:<\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">\n<blockquote>\n<div>In an interview broadcast Sunday, he invited Fox News&#8217; Chris Wallace to &quot;go back and look at how eager the country was to have us work in the aftermath of 9\/11 to make certain that that never happened again.&quot; People have since become &quot;complacent,&quot; he said, but <font color=\"#300030\"><strong>the administration&#8217;s actions have &quot;produced a safe 7.5 years<\/strong><\/font>, and I think the record speaks for itself.&quot;<\/div>\n<\/blockquote><\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">I don&#8217;t think the Hedge Fund Managers are <u><strong>Consequentialists<\/strong><\/u> either. <\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">And there lies the ultimate solution to the dilemma of &quot;<font color=\"#300030\"><strong>the ends justify the means<\/strong><\/font>.&quot; The problem is that it is always short-sighted &#8211; focused only on the &quot;<font color=\"#300030\"><strong>the ends<\/strong><\/font>&quot; desired by the person rationalizing the otherwise unacceptable &quot;<font color=\"#300030\"><strong>means<\/strong><\/font>.&quot; By definition, they are ignoring other &quot;<font color=\"#300030\"><strong>ends<\/strong><\/font>.&quot; It&#8217;s a completely selfish argument &#8211; a logical fallacy.<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">These comments are obvious, but they deserve being reaffirmed because our Republican Congressmen are about to use this kind of fallacious logic in spades. Their goal is to return themselves to power, so they&#8217;re poised with monkey-wrenches to screw up Obama&#8217;s attempts to restore our economic engine and stave off an inevitable Depression. If they&#8217;ve got a better idea, let&#8217;s hear it. I hope that Americans are disgusted enough with this kind of insanity to see right through their ploys and set them straight [and their media pundits along with them]&#8230;<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We&#8217;ve had quite a run recently with the ethical dilemma &#8211; &quot;the ends justify the means.&quot; The outgoing Bush Administration clearly comes down hard on one side of the argument. Assasinating Saddam Hussein, pre-emptively invading a soveriegn nation without provocation, torturing prisoners of war, domestic spying, using the Department of Justice politically, invalidating Congress with [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2769","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2769","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2769"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2769\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2769"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2769"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2769"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}