{"id":3039,"date":"2009-04-07T01:03:05","date_gmt":"2009-04-07T06:03:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=3039"},"modified":"2009-04-07T01:04:27","modified_gmt":"2009-04-07T06:04:27","slug":"so-peronally-obnoxious","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2009\/04\/07\/so-peronally-obnoxious\/","title":{"rendered":"so personally obnoxious…"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
Doug Feith: "I Was a Major Player" in Bush’s Torture Policies<\/a><\/strong>
06 April 2009
by: Jason Leopold
t r u t h o u t | Report<\/strong><\/font><\/div>\n

Doug Feith, former Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, is best known for cooking up bogus prewar Iraq intelligence linking Iraq and al-Qaeda and 9\/11. But in addition to his duties stove piping phony intelligence directly to former Vice President Dick Cheney, Feith was also a key member of a small working group of Defense Department officials who oversaw the implementation of "enhanced interrogation techniques" at Guantanamo Bay that has been widely regarded as torture. Last weekend, Spain’s investigating magistrate Baltasar Garzon, who issued an arrest warrant for former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet in 1998, ordered prosecutors to investigate Feith and five other senior Bush administration officials for sanctioning torture at the prison facility.<\/p>\n

On Sunday, Feith responded to the charges. He told the BBC that "the charges as related to me make no sense." "They criticize me for promoting a controversial position that I never advocated," Feith claimed. But Feith’s denials ring hollow.<\/p>\n

The allegations against Feith contained in the 98-page complaint filed in March 2008 by human rights lawyer Gonzalo Boye and the Association for the [Dignity] was largely gleaned from a lengthy interview Feith gave to international attorney and University College London professor Phillppe Sands. Sands is the author of Torture Team: Rumsfeld’s Memo and the Betrayal of American Values.<\/p>\n

The other Bush officials named in the complaint are: former Justice Department attorneys John Yoo and Jay Bybee, Alberto Gonzales, Cheney’s counsel David Addington and former Pentagon general counsel William Haynes II. The charges cited in the complaint against these officials were also largely based on material Sands cited in his book about the roles they played in sanctioning torture.<\/p>\n

Last year, in response to questions by Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, Condoleezza Rice, who, as National Security Adviser, was part of a working group that included Haynes, Yoo, Addington and Gonzales, said interrogation methods were discussed as early as the summer of 2002 and Yoo provided legal advice at "several" meetings that she attended. She said the DOJ’s advice on the interrogation program "was being coordinated by Counsel to the President Alberto Gonzales."<\/p>\n

Yoo met with Gonzales and Addington to discuss the subjects he intended to address in two August 2002 torture memos, according to a declassified summary of the Armed Services Committee report. Feith was also included in the discussions. Feith told Sands that he "played a major role in" George W. Bush’s decision to sign a February 7, 2002, action memorandum suspending the Geneva Conventions for al-Qaeda and Taliban prisoners who were imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay.<\/p>\n

Feith said 2002 was a special year for him. "This year I was really a player," Feith told Sands. "I asked him whether, in the end, he was at all concerned that the Geneva decision might have diminished America’s moral authority," Sands wrote. "He was not. ‘The problem with moral authority,’ [Feith] said, was ‘people who should know better, like yourself, siding with the assholes, to put it crudely’"…<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Doug Feith<\/strong><\/a> occupies a special place in the Bush pantheon – somewhere near the bottom of the very deep barrel. He came by his Zionism honestly:<\/div>\n
    \n
    His father, Dalck, was a member of the Betar, a Revisionist Zionist<\/span> youth organization, in Poland, and a Holocaust<\/span> survivor who lost his parents and seven siblings in the Nazi concentration camps<\/span>. He … imbued his son with strong and lifelong opinions about government and international relations…<\/em><\/div>\n<\/ul>\n
    But Feith distinguished himself from the others by being a chronic self-righteous liar throughout his career. One of his assistants sits in prison for spying for Israel. He authored the case for Hussein’s union with Al Qaeda and leaked it to the Weekly Standard. Then said it was only a "hypothetical." And as this article details, he was a major player in the Torture scenario. <\/div>\n
    \n
    "Douglas Feith had a long-standing intellectual interest in Geneva, and for many years had opposed legal protections for terrorists under international law," Sands wrote in his book. "He referred me to an article he had written in 1985, in The National Interest, setting out his basic view. Geneva provided incentives to play by the rules; those who chose not to follow the rules, he argued, shouldn’t be allowed to rely on them, or else the whole Geneva structure would collapse. The only way to protect Geneva, in other words, was sometimes to limit its scope. To uphold Geneva’s protections, you might have to cast them aside."<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
    His "eye for an eye" logic became the watchword of the Bush Administration and the Mantra for his Office of Special Plans during the lead-up and early days of the Iraq Invasion.<\/div>\n
    \n
    On Thursday, April 2, two days after this story was first published Justin Polin, Feith’s research assistant based at the Hudson Institute, sent me an e-mail stating that Sands’ account of their conversation as described in Torture Team was inaccurate and filled with "distortions," and "misquotations." "You cite the work of Philippe Sands to imply that Mr. Feith somehow advocated torture. Mr. Feith did no such thing," Polin wrote. "Mr. Feith rebutted Mr. Sands’s allegations in detail during a July 15 hearing of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties"…<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
    And, in spite of his denials, he’d made a career of opposing the Geneva Conventions for over twenty years.<\/div>\n
    \n
    Still, in addition to Sands’ account, New Yorker reporter Jane Mayer, in her book, The Dark Side, also documented Feith’s role in implementing aggressive interrogation techniques and his position that the Geneva Conventions did not apply to terrorists.<\/div>\n

    "As far back as the 1980s, when he had been a midlevel Reagan Administration official, Feith had argued that terrorists did not deserve to be protected by the Geneva Conventions. The issue had first arisen in connection with the Palestinian Liberation Organization," Mayer wrote. "Feith, a passionate Zionist, had helped to convince the Reagan Administration to oppose international efforts to protect anti-Israel terrorists as soldiers. John Yoo and other Bush Administration lawyers seized on this position as a precedent."<\/p>\n

    Moreover, the Senate Armed Services Committee and the American Civil Liberties Union has already released documents showing that Haynes. the Pentagon’s general counsel regularly briefed Feith about a list of aggressive interrogation techniques for use against "high-value" Guantanamo detainees. In November 2002, Haynes sent Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld a memo stating that he "had discussed the issue [of enhanced interrogations] with Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Doug Feith, and General [Richard] Myers and that he believed they concurred in his recommendation."<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
    Finally, there may be hard evidence that will get around his tortured defenses and creative distortion of history.<\/div>\n
    \n
    The Senate Armed Services Committee is expected to release a declassified version of its report that will include a full account of Feith’s role in implementing a policy of torture at Guantanamo. The report is 200 pages, contains 2,000 footnotes, and will reveal a wealth of new information about the genesis of the Bush administration’s interrogation policies, according to these sources. The investigation relied upon the testimony of 70 people, generated 38,000 pages of documents, and took 18 months to complete…<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
    It’s remarkable how quickly the Bush Administration has been forgotten. Here, only a couple of months after the changing of the guard, we’re engrossed in the Bail-Out, the Stimulus, the Banks, the Depression<\/strike> Recession<\/strike> Financial Crisis, and the likes of David Addington<\/strong>, John Yoo<\/strong>, Alberto Gonzales<\/strong>, Paul Wolfowitz<\/strong>, Donald Rumsfeld<\/strong>, Dick Cheney<\/strong>, and Doug Feith<\/strong> have all but faded into the background. In many ways, it was a coup, a takeover of the government. Concepts like the Right to Privacy, the Geneva Conventions, Habeus Corpus were jettisoned in secret as if they were parts of a procedure manual being revised, rather that threads in the fabric of our union. And Doug Feith<\/strong> was a leader in the pack. It’s not popular to say it this way, but Doug Feith<\/strong> implemented the foreign policy of the right-wing forces in the Israeli government as if they were our own. If not an actual Israeli Agent, he was as close to one as you can get without having a commission. He played with our principles as if our war with Iraq were a board game. The only way he might avoid being called to task is that he is so personally obnoxious that people might pass over him to escape listening to him. <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Doug Feith: "I Was a Major Player" in Bush’s Torture Policies 06 April 2009 by: Jason Leopold t r u t h o u t | Report Doug Feith, former Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, is best known for cooking up bogus prewar Iraq intelligence linking Iraq and al-Qaeda and 9\/11. But in addition to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3039","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3039","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3039"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3039\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3039"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3039"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3039"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}