{"id":31817,"date":"2013-01-08T11:18:05","date_gmt":"2013-01-08T16:18:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=31817"},"modified":"2013-01-08T19:33:19","modified_gmt":"2013-01-09T00:33:19","slug":"postcards-from-the-grave","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/01\/08\/postcards-from-the-grave\/","title":{"rendered":"postcards from the grave&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<br \/>\n<table cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"5\" border=\"0\" align=\"center\">\n<tr>\n<td align=\"justify\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">he&middot;gem&middot;o&middot;ny<\/font><\/strong>  [<font color=\"#200020\">h<img decoding=\"async\" border=\"0\" align=\"absbottom\" src=\"http:\/\/img.tfd.com\/hm\/GIF\/ebreve.gif\" \/>j<img decoding=\"async\" border=\"0\" align=\"absbottom\" src=\"http:\/\/img.tfd.com\/hm\/GIF\/prime.gif\" \/><img decoding=\"async\" border=\"0\" align=\"absbottom\" src=\"http:\/\/img.tfd.com\/hm\/GIF\/schwa.gif\" \/>-m<img decoding=\"async\" border=\"0\" align=\"absbottom\" src=\"http:\/\/img.tfd.com\/hm\/GIF\/omacr.gif\" \/><img decoding=\"async\" border=\"0\" align=\"absbottom\" src=\"http:\/\/img.tfd.com\/hm\/GIF\/lprime.gif\" \/>n<img decoding=\"async\" border=\"0\" align=\"absbottom\" src=\"http:\/\/img.tfd.com\/hm\/GIF\/emacr.gif\" \/><\/font>]<br \/>                  <font color=\"#200020\">&nbsp;&nbsp;noun<br \/>                  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;1: preponderant influence or authority over others: domination<br \/>                  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2: the social, cultural, ideological, or economic influence exerted by a dominant group <\/font><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p align=\"justify\">Psychiatry is approaching a crisis. For thirty years, it has been dominated by the inertia of the coup d&#8217;etat in 1980, the DSM-III revision that became a virtual Declaration of Independence from its domination by a small but powerful subgroup &#8211; the psychoanalysts. While claiming to redefine its own destiny, it has been increasingly shaped by other powerful forces &#8211; the Insurance\/Hospital Industries in a variety of incarnations and the well-heeled Pharmaceutical Industry, soon to be joined by an emerging third power &#8211; the government.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Like the Star Wars series or the cowboy movies which take place primarily in systems at the edge of the things, psychiatry has always operated at the outer rim of the medical galaxy &#8211; dealing, as we do, with the most complex and least understandable of organ systems. The analysts had their shot at the software side followed now by the biologists who focused on the hardware. But what we still don&#8217;t know about both is painfully clear to us all [and everyone else] &#8211; keeping us wandering in the wilderness prey to the chaos of a frontier culture. While that makes for excellent fiction, it&#8217;s a difficult and volatile academic enterprise and we have recurrent <strong><font color=\"#200020\">he&middot;gem&middot;o&middot;ny <\/font><\/strong>problems. <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">Last week, I blogged about articles on <strong><font color=\"#000066\"><em>Med<\/em>scape<\/font><\/strong> by two of our most prominent leaders, Dr. Jefferey Leiberman, president elect of the American Psychiatric Association, and Dr. David Kupfer, leader of the DSM-5 Task Force, a code book often referred to as the the &#8216;Bible&#8217; of psychiatry. Both were defending the industry connections of our leaders. From Dr. Lieberman:<\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\"><sup><strong>&#8230; but the fact of the matter is  that this does not mean that the  academic medical community and             physician investigators  should not or cannot be actively  involved collaboratively in the drug  discovery and development process.             Indeed, this type of  interaction and collaboration is not  just helpful but is essential if  we are going to sustain medical             progress in developing  treatments for human disease&#8230;<\/strong><\/sup><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">and from Dr. Kupfer:<\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\"><sup><strong>&quot;When we established the limits on income from industry   sources, we looked to make them more stringent than requirements for              staff at the   National Institutes of Health, members of   advisory committees for the Food and Drug Administration, and most              academic departments,&quot; he   answered. Dr. Kupfer added that each  member agreed to follow these  limits at the start of their work on  DSM-5 &mdash; and to continue following             them   as long as they are  involved in the development of  the manual. &quot;APA has looked to  strengthen these policies even further             for new clinical  practice   guidelines in development&#8230;&quot;<\/strong><\/sup><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">No one is arguing about academic psychiatrists having some input into the development of psychiatric medications by the pharmaceutical industry. <strong><font color=\"#200020\">What we&#8217;re screaming about is things going the other way &#8211; the pharmaceutical industry having input into the power structure and <em>expert<\/em> opinions of academic psychiatrists! <\/font><\/strong>And that&#8217;s an elementary observation easily made by these smart guys &#8211; they know what we&#8217;re saying already. It&#8217;s not about information, it&#8217;s about marketing and money. Dr. Kupfer acts as though a temporary limitations on the flow of dough to the DSM-5 Task Force members is adequate. It&#8217;s the opposite, a ruse. And Lieberman&#8217;s point about being involved in drug discovery evades the malignant epidemic of conflicts of interest in the ranks of the APA. His own N.I.M.H. study, C.A.T.I.E., invalidated the message of a hoard of KOLs who were virtual evangelists for the wonders of the Atypical Antipsychotics. Didn&#8217;t he read it and then look back at the literature that came before! And then he signed on to the industry financed C.A.F.E. study which tried to soften his own findings. What&#8217;s wrong with this thinking? [see comments <a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/01\/06\/a-start-3\/#comment-234708\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/01\/06\/a-start-3\/#comment-234712\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>].<\/div>\n<p>  <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">I&#8217;m reminded of my Dad&#8217;s saying, &quot;<em>I don&#8217;t mind you peeing in my boot, but don&#8217;t tell me it&#8217;s water.<\/em>&quot; He had another favorite, &quot;<em>If you&#8217;re not going to do it right, don&#8217;t do it at all.<\/em>&quot; Both seem to fit. Enough already with the frontier fiction&#8230;<\/div>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/>\n<div><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Update<\/font><\/strong>: <a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/01\/08\/postcards-from-the-grave\/#comment-234771\" target=\"_blank\">Duane&#8217;s Mom<\/a> weighs in,  &ldquo;<em>You made the mess&hellip; You clean it up.<\/em>&rdquo;<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>he&middot;gem&middot;o&middot;ny [hj-mn] &nbsp;&nbsp;noun &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;1: preponderant influence or authority over others: domination &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2: the social, cultural, ideological, or economic influence exerted by a dominant group Psychiatry is approaching a crisis. For thirty years, it has been dominated by the inertia of the coup d&#8217;etat in 1980, the DSM-III revision that became a virtual Declaration of Independence [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31817","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31817","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31817"}],"version-history":[{"count":24,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31817\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31866,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31817\/revisions\/31866"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31817"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31817"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31817"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}