{"id":33813,"date":"2013-03-05T09:42:59","date_gmt":"2013-03-05T14:42:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=33813"},"modified":"2013-03-06T07:22:29","modified_gmt":"2013-03-06T12:22:29","slug":"some-time-back","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/03\/05\/some-time-back\/","title":{"rendered":"some time back…"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\n\n\n
\n
<\/a>
[link<\/a>]<\/sup><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
New opportunities for treatment development. The enormous expansion of the medication portfolio for mental disorders between 1980 and 2000 was limited to a relatively narrow space of biology. Over the past decade, a new focus on the genetics and neurobiology of these disorders has generated a range of new targets for next-generation treatments. In addition, the broad categories of symptoms [analogous to fever or pain] are giving way to more targeted clinical symptoms that cut across current diagnostic bins[e.g., anhedonia and social deficits]. And the limited options for treatments is expanding to include targeted behavioral interventions disseminated via new media, innovative somatic treatments based on identified circuit dysfunction, and strategic combinations [such as cognitive enhancers to improve the impact of cognitive behavior therapy]. ECT, electroconvulsive therapy; CBT, cognitive behavioral therapy; DBT, dialectical behavior therapy; IPT, interpersonal behavior therapy; rTMS, transcranial magnetic stimulation; DBS, deep brain stimulation.<\/strong><\/sup><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n

This slide and text come from a presentation by Dr. Dennis Charney, now Dean at Mount Sinai, called "A Roadmap for Innovation in Psychiatry<\/font><\/strong><\/em><\/a>." We’ve probably all been to such talks about the future – what’s in the ‘pipeline’ or what’s coming ‘down the pike.’ The usual format is to have the last great disappointments on the left and the next great hopes on the right. Since the 1980 revolution in psychiatry, we’ve had way more than our share of such presentations – with words like ‘innovation’, ‘novel’, advances in’, ‘neurobiology of’, etc. The oddity about this slide is that the column on the left could have been headed with ‘1960-1980’ instead of ‘1980-2000’ – or even ‘1960-present.’ And we all know it – that the efforts of the last thirty years have not born much promised fruit. So the presentations these days have something of a desperate quality, suffused with speculation.<\/p>\n

When I say "these days," I mean something specific. In the Fall of 2011, there was a dramatic change in rhetoric. There was a loud collective wail as it became apparent that PHARMA was pulling out of CNS drug development [myopia – uncorrected<\/a>, so far off track…<\/a>, APF Convenes Unique Pipeline Summit<\/a>, No Psychiatry Without Psychopharmacology<\/a>, suddenly, last summer…<\/em><\/a>]. And the DSM-5 Task Force was forced to admit that their plan for a biological DSM had gone belly-up [class action in the air…<\/a>]. In that period, Dr. Tom Insel weighed in with a speech about brain circuits:<\/div>\n
\n
Brain circuitry model for mental illness will transform management, NIH mental health director says<\/a>
British Medical Journal<\/font><\/strong>
by Caroline White
1 September 2011 <\/div>\n

The field of mental health is on the cusp of a revolution, which is set to transform the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness and reverse the lack of major progress made in curbing associated ill health and death over the past 100 years, the director of the US National Institute of Mental Health, has claimed…<\/strong><\/sup><\/p>\n

The seismic shift had been driven by what he described as three “revolutionary changes” in thinking, the first of which was that mental illness was increasingly being recognised as a disorder of brain circuitry, rather than as a chemical imbalance<\/font>, thanks to neuroimaging techniques and the discovery of some key biomarkers…<\/strong><\/sup><\/p>\n

Secondly, mental ill health was now recognised as a developmental disorder for which early intervention was vital, said Professor Insel, highlighting US research showing that 50% of study participants had reported the onset of mental health problems by the age of 14, and 75% by the age of 24. “We are still stuck with getting to the problem very late. The future will be about understanding the trajectory of illness so that we can identify the first signs before it develops into psychosis,” he said…<\/strong><\/sup><\/p>\n

The third change was the recognition that mental ill health is a complex mix of genetic and experiential factors. “This is not new,” he affirmed. “But what is new is the ability to probe the genetics of the disorder”…<\/strong><\/sup><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Since then, we’ve been treated to a series of talks like this one by Dr. Charney. ‘Chemical Imbalance’ is out. ‘Brain Circuits’ are in. While the genome and the search for biomarkers lingers, neuroimaging carries much the weight of the future. <\/div>\n

And traditional psychiatric diagnosis is out, even with the leaders of the diagnostic manual revision team itself. Since neither pharmacotherapy nor the lab findings map to clinical psychiatric diagnoses, psychiatry is apparently going to try to map itself onto our pharmacology and a variety of technologies. Charney’s version:<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Leading Charney, like the DSM-5 Task Force leaders, like Dr. Insel, to the NIMH RDoC and its assumptions: <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

I won’t go on and on about Dr. Charney’s presentation. The slides<\/a> are available for all to see. It’s a potpourri of neuroscience concepts that seem to be strung together almost at random, ending with this slide:<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

I used the words "desperate" and "speculative" earlier to describe many of the recent presentations about the future – and this one gets high marks in both categories. Some<\/a> are using the term "cargo cult science<\/a>" to describe talks like this – referring to the aboriginals who build primitive airstrip facimiles in hopes of attracting planes like the real airfields they’ve seen eg throwing out neuroscience concepts hoping to attract something of value. It’s a good analogy, but another occurred to me as I thought about his slide presentation. <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

In my last post, I used a recent beach scene, a dancing heron. The story behind that picture is more complicated than shows. The heron stood like a wood carving, transfixed on a man fishing in the surf. Then, the fisherman hooked a fish, and the heron became excited and watched the line as intently as the fisherman himself. The heron’s dance came when a small fish was landed. The fisherman dutifully turned it over to the eager heron who took off in a flash. I had seen the Charney slides the evening before, so my analogy is obvious – the layer of KOLs watching and waiting for anything in the exciting neuroscience literature to translate<\/em> into some future breakthrough.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

And then… a lady with a red hat walked towards the beach with the remains of her sandwich, and the formerly statuesque gulls came to life – and I had an even better analogy. I think that’s how I see a large segment of the upper echelon of psychiatric KOLs – just waiting for anything that comes along to pounce on and turn into one of these futuristic articles or presentations, particularly in this time of famine with the PHARMA<\/em> pipeline<\/em> slowed to a barely a trickle [if even that]. <\/p>\n

I’m as interested in the findings of the modern bench neuroscientists as the next guy. They are on a roll, at the threshold of many things to come in the distant future. But in clinical psychiatry, this is hardly the time for wild speculations or desperate claims of breakthroughs just around the corner. This is an age where former irrational exuberance and broken promises hang thickly in the air – a time when the unimaginable corruption of the not so distant past is becoming increasingly clear with every passing day. Dr. Charney has over 500 articles in PubMed<\/a>. He has a book, the Peace of Mind Prescription<\/em>, coauthored<\/em> by the infamous Dr. Charles Nemeroff actually written by Stephen Braun [suspicious mind[s]…<\/a>]; Charney was an author on the ghost-written paper that got Dr. Nemeroff removed as editor for Neuropsychopharmacology [sally’s world…<\/a>]; and he and Dr. Dwight Evans signed on to a ghost-written infomercial editorial in Biological Psychiatry in 2003 exposed by POGO [roaches…<\/a>]. Each of these outings were PHARMA funded. Dr. Charney is a solid member of what has been called the academic-pharmaceutical complex.<\/p>\n

We’ve heard more than enough from Dr. Charney and his colleagues about just about everything they want to talk about. There’s a time for their kind of fanciful rhetoric to stop, and we passed that limit some time back… <\/div>\n
hat tip to Jamzo [and the heron]  <\/strong><\/sub><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[link] New opportunities for treatment development. The enormous expansion of the medication portfolio for mental disorders between 1980 and 2000 was limited to a relatively narrow space of biology. Over the past decade, a new focus on the genetics and neurobiology of these disorders has generated a range of new targets for next-generation treatments. In […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33813","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33813","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33813"}],"version-history":[{"count":68,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33813\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33917,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33813\/revisions\/33917"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33813"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33813"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33813"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}